Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NCbioRxiv

LEAPING A CONSERVATION GENETICS GAP: COMBINING POPULATION GENETICS AND SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR LUPINUS PERENNIS RESTORATION

  • C. Kimball-Rhines1
  • S. Taveras-Guzman
  • G. Mavrommati
  • B. T. Moyers
  1. 1University of Massachusetts Amherst
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Genomic data can assist conservation planning, but implementation of genetic-based recommendations is rare. Closing this "conservation genetics gap" is crucial for restoration and translocation decisions, particularly for highly fragmented ecosystems like pine barrens. We first analyze the conservation genetics gap in pine barren management organizations using a survey. We then analyze whole-genome data to characterize population structure and diversity in the pine barren keystone plant Lupinus perennis. We find little genetic difference among L. perennis populations in the Northeast United States. While populations show signs of isolation by distance (rho = 0.785, p = 0.001), we find no correlation between population size and heterozygosity (Estimate = 0.003, p = 0.357) or inbreeding (Estimate = 0.028, p = 0.416). We also find no effect of seed source population on forecasted effective population size in restoration simulations. These findings and our recommendation that managers consider non-local seed provenancing for L. perennis restorations in the Northeast have been integrated into SWAP policy in two states. We generally recommend practitioners record seed provenance, save genetic material for future testing, and incorporate fitness metrics into restoration monitoring. To effectively close the conservation genetics gap, researchers providing conservation recommendations must consult with practitioners before designing experiments.

Related

  1. A comprehensive review of Helminthostachys zeylanica (L.) Hook.: medicinal uses, distribution, conservation, population genetics and phylogeography
    Paresh Kumar Swain, Huei-Chuan Shih, Rizal M. Suhardi +4
    Frontiers in Plant SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Plant biologyFrontiersCrossref
  2. Plant Conservation Genetics Advocates for a Green List
    Alison Gonçalves Nazareno, Loreta Brandão de Freitas, Christine E. Edwards
    Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyCrossrefDOAJ
  3. Integrating conservation genetics into Philippine pangolin (Manis culionensis) research: insights and future directions
    Joey Ace Peralta, Azenegash Abebe Belachew, Bryan Joel S. Mariano +2
    Discover ConservationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsDOAJ
  4. Heterosis in crosses between remnant populations of the rare prairie forb Silene regia: Implications for restoration genetics
    Isabelle A. Turner, Juan Diego Rojas‐Gutierrez, Bob Easter +1
    American Journal of BotanyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMC
  5. Conservation genetics of the spotted bat: Insights from ancient, historical, and modern samples
    Faith M. Walker, Daniel E. Sanchez, Michael G. Campana +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEvolutionary biologyPLOS

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@misc{kimballrhines2026leaping,
  title = {{LEAPING A CONSERVATION GENETICS GAP: COMBINING POPULATION GENETICS AND SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR LUPINUS PERENNIS RESTORATION}},
  author = {C. Kimball-Rhines and S. Taveras-Guzman and G. Mavrommati and B. T. Moyers},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.08.31.748316},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.748316v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - LEAPING A CONSERVATION GENETICS GAP: COMBINING POPULATION GENETICS AND SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS FOR LUPINUS PERENNIS RESTORATION
AU  - C. Kimball-Rhines
AU  - S. Taveras-Guzman
AU  - G. Mavrommati
AU  - B. T. Moyers
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.08.31.748316
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.31.748316v1
AB  - Genomic data can assist conservation planning, but implementation of genetic-based recommendations is rare. Closing this "conservation genetics gap" is crucial for restoration and translocation decisions, particularly for highly fragmented ecosystems like pine barrens. We first analyze the conservation genetics gap in pine barren management organizations using a survey. We then analyze whole-genome data to characterize population structure and diversity in the pine barren keystone plant Lupinus perennis. We find little genetic difference among L. perennis populations in the Northeast United States. While populations show signs of isolation by distance (rho = 0.785, p = 0.001), we find no correlation between population size and heterozygosity (Estimate = 0.003, p = 0.357) or inbreeding (Estimate = 0.028, p = 0.416). We also find no effect of seed source population on forecasted effective population size in restoration simulations. These findings and our recommendation that managers consider non-local seed provenancing for L. perennis restorations in the Northeast have been integrated into SWAP policy in two states. We generally recommend practitioners record seed provenance, save genetic material for future testing, and incorporate fitness metrics into restoration monitoring. To effectively close the conservation genetics gap, researchers providing conservation recommendations must consult with practitioners before designing experiments.
ER  -