Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0JAMA Network Open

Distribution of Coal Power, Pollution, and Poverty

  1. 1Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
  2. 2Center for Health Disparities Research, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health UW Hospital and Clinics, Madison
  3. 3Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison

Abstract

Importance: The adverse social exposome—life-course exposure to harmful social-environmental conditions—is associated with poor health outcomes. Exposure to heavy metals in air pollution from coal-fired power plants (CPP) may represent an underlying mechanism of this disparity, yet the association between the US adverse social exposome measured with the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and CPP remains unknown.

Objective: To characterize the populations and adverse social exposome (indexed by ADI) of communities neighboring operational CPP.

Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of the US population using data from the 2023 Neighborhood Atlas. Data were analyzed from March to April 2026.

Exposure: Proximity to CPP was operationalized using 4 circular buffer zones: 3, 10, 25, and 50 miles in radius.

Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Characterize each buffer zone by ADI and (2) determine the potential population-level exposure to CPP. Census block group delineations and population characteristics are from time-concordant US Census and American Community Survey data.

Results: The 2023 US population included 335 563 144 people (169 517 541 [50.5%] female, 66 294 296 [19.8%] Hispanic, 269 268 846 [80.2%] not Hispanic or Latino, and 212 002 396 [63.1%] White). A total of 2 783 004 people (0.83% of the US population) lived within 3 miles of a CPP. This group was more likely to live in the highest ADI neighborhoods as compared with the lowest ADI neighborhoods. Compared with the US population, these individuals were more likely to be American Indian and Alaska Native, White, and non-Hispanic. Populations living in the lowest 10% of ADI neighborhoods (most advantaged) had lower odds (odds ratio, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.81) of living within 3 miles of a CPP as compared with populations living in the highest 10% of ADI neighborhoods (most disadvantaged).

Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US communities’ proximity to CPP, we found that neighborhoods potentially exposed to CPP’s hazardous environmental toxicants were more likely to be high ADI (ie, lower socioeconomic status) than low ADI (ie, higher socioeconomic status), highlighting the significantly greater burden of environmental toxicants potentially borne by disadvantaged US populations. Recent federal deregulations are likely to further increase these potential CPP-related toxin exposures. Additional study is needed to determine if these environmental toxicants trigger biological mechanisms underpinning the association between high ADI and poor health.

Related

  1. Contrasting Coal Power Trajectories in Southern Africa: Compound Air Pollution, Extreme Heat Exposures and the 2023 Hwange Expansion
    Handsome Bongani Nyoni, Rutendo Norman Mandeya, Daniel Tigere +5
    EarthArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthEarthArXiv
  2. Coal-Fired Power Plants and the Adverse Social Exposome—Where Advantage Is Absent, Burden Accumulates
    Shady Abohashem
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
  3. Prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heating-season air pollution: associations with birth outcomes in a coal-reliant city
    Rong Cui, Yujian Zheng, Naifan Zhang +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  4. Two-Phase Occupational Screening in Coal-Fired Power Plant Workers: Anamnestic Risk Stratification and Targeted Low-Dose CT Findings.
    Adrian Cranta, Eugen Osiac, Dan Ionuț Gheonea +7
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Sex‐Stratified Associations of DXA‐Derived Adiposity, Regional Fat Distribution and Muscle Power With Incident Hospitalised Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Ting Zhang, Yuan Gao, Yafei Wu +2
    Diabetes, Obesity & MetabolismPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPhysiologyPMC
BibTeX
@article{melcher2026distribution,
  title = {{Distribution of Coal Power, Pollution, and Poverty}},
  author = {Eleanna M. Melcher and William R. Buckingham and Sarah A. Keller and Amy J. H. Kind},
  journal = {JAMA Network Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.42335},
  url = {https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2856257},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Distribution of Coal Power, Pollution, and Poverty
AU  - Eleanna M. Melcher
AU  - William R. Buckingham
AU  - Sarah A. Keller
AU  - Amy J. H. Kind
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
JO  - JAMA Network Open
DO  - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.42335
UR  - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2856257
AB  - Importance: The adverse social exposome—life-course exposure to harmful social-environmental conditions—is associated with poor health outcomes. Exposure to heavy metals in air pollution from coal-fired power plants (CPP) may represent an underlying mechanism of this disparity, yet the association between the US adverse social exposome measured with the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and CPP remains unknown.  Objective: To characterize the populations and adverse social exposome (indexed by ADI) of communities neighboring operational CPP.  Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of the US population using data from the 2023 Neighborhood Atlas. Data were analyzed from March to April 2026.  Exposure: Proximity to CPP was operationalized using 4 circular buffer zones: 3, 10, 25, and 50 miles in radius.  Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Characterize each buffer zone by ADI and (2) determine the potential population-level exposure to CPP. Census block group delineations and population characteristics are from time-concordant US Census and American Community Survey data.  Results: The 2023 US population included 335 563 144 people (169 517 541 [50.5%] female, 66 294 296 [19.8%] Hispanic, 269 268 846 [80.2%] not Hispanic or Latino, and 212 002 396 [63.1%] White). A total of 2 783 004 people (0.83% of the US population) lived within 3 miles of a CPP. This group was more likely to live in the highest ADI neighborhoods as compared with the lowest ADI neighborhoods. Compared with the US population, these individuals were more likely to be American Indian and Alaska Native, White, and non-Hispanic. Populations living in the lowest 10% of ADI neighborhoods (most advantaged) had lower odds (odds ratio, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.00-0.81) of living within 3 miles of a CPP as compared with populations living in the highest 10% of ADI neighborhoods (most disadvantaged).  Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of US communities’ proximity to CPP, we found that neighborhoods potentially exposed to CPP’s hazardous environmental toxicants were more likely to be high ADI (ie, lower socioeconomic status) than low ADI (ie, higher socioeconomic status), highlighting the significantly greater burden of environmental toxicants potentially borne by disadvantaged US populations. Recent federal deregulations are likely to further increase these potential CPP-related toxin exposures. Additional study is needed to determine if these environmental toxicants trigger biological mechanisms underpinning the association between high ADI and poor health.
SN  - 2574-3805
ER  -