Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Cooperative Integer Programming Games: Core Stability and Optimal Coalition Structures

Abstract

We introduce cooperative integer programming games (CIPGs), in which agents pool budget constraints to accomplish indivisible tasks jointly and the characteristic function maps every coalition to the optimal value of a pooled integer program. Our goal is to identify an optimal coalition structure (OCS) and a stable one (OSCS). We derive a stability inequality that keeps each formed coalition in the Core with respect to itself, and present two mixed-integer OCS formulations, aggregated and disaggregated, proving that the disaggregated formulation is integer-equivalent yet yields a tighter LP relaxation. Building on the stability inequality we develop lifted stability cuts, several separation strategies inside a cutting-plane algorithm, an SCS-feasible primal heuristic that constructs warm starts with guaranteed stability, and a payoff-refinement step computing the Shapley value and the nucleolus of every formed coalition. On benchmark cooperative knapsack games, the method certifies optimality with up to 16 players and reaches MIP gaps below 1% at 30 players while evaluating 766 of the roughly 109 coalition values.

Related

  1. Integer linear programming based methods for computing the maximum chordal subgraph of an arbitrary graph
    François Clautiaux, Pierre Pesneau
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  2. Hidden Convexity via Symmetric Displacement Covers: Mixed-Integer Quadratic Programming and Integer Cubic Programming in Fixed Dimension
    Cinar Ari, Robert Hildebrand
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Learning to Solve Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming with Neural Networks and Sequential Quadratic Programming Refinement
    Viet-Anh Le, Rahul Mangharam
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Accelerated Benders decomposition for bi-objective mixed integer programming
    Duleabom An, Chungmok Lee, Sophie N. Parragh
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. Physics-Informed Mixed Integer Programming Methods for Optimal Patch Antennas
    Ruben Hoeksma, Jesse van Rhijn, Marc Uetz +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{lee2026cooperative,
  title = {{Cooperative Integer Programming Games: Core Stability and Optimal Coalition Structures}},
  author = {Hyunwoo Lee and Robert Hildebrand and I. Esra Buyuktahtakin},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.11116},
  eprint = {2609.11116},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11116},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Cooperative Integer Programming Games: Core Stability and Optimal Coalition Structures
AU  - Hyunwoo Lee
AU  - Robert Hildebrand
AU  - I. Esra Buyuktahtakin
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.11116
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11116
AB  - We introduce cooperative integer programming games (CIPGs), in which agents pool budget constraints to accomplish indivisible tasks jointly and the characteristic function maps every coalition to the optimal value of a pooled integer program. Our goal is to identify an optimal coalition structure (OCS) and a stable one (OSCS). We derive a stability inequality that keeps each formed coalition in the Core with respect to itself, and present two mixed-integer OCS formulations, aggregated and disaggregated, proving that the disaggregated formulation is integer-equivalent yet yields a tighter LP relaxation. Building on the stability inequality we develop lifted stability cuts, several separation strategies inside a cutting-plane algorithm, an SCS-feasible primal heuristic that constructs warm starts with guaranteed stability, and a payoff-refinement step computing the Shapley value and the nucleolus of every formed coalition. On benchmark cooperative knapsack games, the method certifies optimality with up to 16 players and reaches MIP gaps below 1% at 30 players while evaluating 766 of the roughly 10^9 coalition values.
ER  -