Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Nutrients

From Feeding Difficulties to Nutritional Risk in Children with Down Syndrome

  1. 1Faculty of Tourism and Rural Development in Požega, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vukovarska 17, 34000 Požega, Croatia

Abstract

Children with Down syndrome (DS) may experience feeding difficulties arising from interactions among hypotonia, cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal conditions, swallowing dysfunction, oral-motor and sensory differences, delayed feeding skill development, and psychosocial or environmental factors. These difficulties may compromise feeding safety and efficiency, restrict dietary diversity, and contribute to inadequate fluid or nutrient intake, faltering growth, micronutrient deficiencies, or excess adiposity. This narrative review synthesized the literature selected for its relevance to feeding development and nutritional risk in children and adolescents with DS. Sources were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Web of Science Core Collection, supplemented by reference-list review and citation tracking; cited sources were last verified on 26 August 2026. Evidence was organized according to developmental stage and clinical domain, with attention to study design, sampling, assessment methods, and applicability to the pediatric DS population. The findings indicate that breastfeeding is possible but may require early assessment of milk transfer and nutritional adequacy. Oropharyngeal dysphagia and silent aspiration are important clinical concerns, although much of the evidence comes from selected clinical and referral-based cohorts. Impaired chewing, delayed texture progression, and food selectivity may restrict the consumption of meat, vegetables, whole grains, and other nutrient-dense foods, potentially reducing dietary variety and the intake of protein, fiber, and specific micronutrients. Reliance on a narrow range of accepted soft or energy-dense foods may nevertheless provide adequate or excessive energy, allowing poor dietary quality to coexist with excess body weight. Nutritional assessment should therefore consider food choices, texture adaptations, and actual nutrient intake alongside growth and body mass index. The strongest support is for systematic, individualized, and multidisciplinary care integrating swallowing safety, feeding skills, actual dietary and fluid intake, growth, biochemical status, associated medical conditions, and family circumstances. Evidence for specific feeding therapies, supplements, and nutrition-related interventions remains limited by small samples, heterogeneous methods, and short follow-up. More representative longitudinal and intervention studies using standardized, age-appropriate outcomes are needed.

Related

  1. Editorial: Unpacking the correlation between feeding difficulties and feeding or eating disorders in children and adolescents
    Meeta R. Patel, Terence Dovey, Ulrike M. E. Schulze +1
    Frontiers in Child and Adolescent PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthDOAJ
  2. Complementary Feeding Practices and Nutritional Status Among Pakistani Children Aged 6–23 Months: A Pooled Analysis of Nationally Representative Surveys
    Arjumand Rizvi, Afsah Bhutta, Muhammad Sajid +2
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNutritionCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Children and Adolescents: Nutritional Risk, Diagnostic Boundaries, and Multidisciplinary Care—A Narrative Review
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
  4. Multifactorial nutritional and metabolic risk profiles for behavioral outcomes in Chinese children: a cross-sectional study at a Health Management Center using explainable machine learning and principal component analysis
    Ying Shen, Meiying Gao, Qingnan Sun +3
    Translational pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Post-discharge fortified human milk feeding in preterm infants with moderate-to-high nutritional risk: a retrospective cohort study
    WANG Yun-He, YAO Yi, CHI Yun-Qian +5
    中国当代儿科杂志Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{ravancic2026from,
  title = {{From Feeding Difficulties to Nutritional Risk in Children with Down Syndrome}},
  author = {Maja Ergović Ravančić and Valentina Obradović and Svjetlana Škrabal},
  journal = {Nutrients},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/nu18193295},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/19/3295},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - From Feeding Difficulties to Nutritional Risk in Children with Down Syndrome
AU  - Maja Ergović Ravančić
AU  - Valentina Obradović
AU  - Svjetlana Škrabal
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/08
JO  - Nutrients
DO  - 10.3390/nu18193295
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/19/3295
AB  - Children with Down syndrome (DS) may experience feeding difficulties arising from interactions among hypotonia, cardiorespiratory and gastrointestinal conditions, swallowing dysfunction, oral-motor and sensory differences, delayed feeding skill development, and psychosocial or environmental factors. These difficulties may compromise feeding safety and efficiency, restrict dietary diversity, and contribute to inadequate fluid or nutrient intake, faltering growth, micronutrient deficiencies, or excess adiposity. This narrative review synthesized the literature selected for its relevance to feeding development and nutritional risk in children and adolescents with DS. Sources were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Web of Science Core Collection, supplemented by reference-list review and citation tracking; cited sources were last verified on 26 August 2026. Evidence was organized according to developmental stage and clinical domain, with attention to study design, sampling, assessment methods, and applicability to the pediatric DS population. The findings indicate that breastfeeding is possible but may require early assessment of milk transfer and nutritional adequacy. Oropharyngeal dysphagia and silent aspiration are important clinical concerns, although much of the evidence comes from selected clinical and referral-based cohorts. Impaired chewing, delayed texture progression, and food selectivity may restrict the consumption of meat, vegetables, whole grains, and other nutrient-dense foods, potentially reducing dietary variety and the intake of protein, fiber, and specific micronutrients. Reliance on a narrow range of accepted soft or energy-dense foods may nevertheless provide adequate or excessive energy, allowing poor dietary quality to coexist with excess body weight. Nutritional assessment should therefore consider food choices, texture adaptations, and actual nutrient intake alongside growth and body mass index. The strongest support is for systematic, individualized, and multidisciplinary care integrating swallowing safety, feeding skills, actual dietary and fluid intake, growth, biochemical status, associated medical conditions, and family circumstances. Evidence for specific feeding therapies, supplements, and nutrition-related interventions remains limited by small samples, heterogeneous methods, and short follow-up. More representative longitudinal and intervention studies using standardized, age-appropriate outcomes are needed.
SN  - 2072-6643
ER  -