Machine learning classification of digital exclusion in ageing populations across five international cohorts.
5 affiliations
- 1School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
- 2Department of Gastrointestinal Colorectal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
- 3School of Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
- 4Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
- 5First Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China. [email protected].
Abstract
Digital exclusion may limit access to increasingly digital health and public services, yet its cross-national structure and model transportability remain uncertain. We analysed harmonised cross-sectional data from 71,689 middle-aged and older adults in CHARLS, ELSA, HRS, MHAS and SHARE. Digital exclusion was defined as no reported internet or email use, a proxy for basic digital participation. Gradient Boosting discriminated concurrent exclusion with AUCs of 0.734-0.850, but logistic regression performed similarly (0.721-0.846; differences 0.001-0.013). Within SHARE, descriptive country-level exclusion ranged from 20.1% in Denmark to 79.2% in Poland. Leave-one-cohort-out validation showed partial transportability, with mean AUC attenuation of 0.026. Cross-fitted classification scores were associated with concurrent depression (pooled adjusted OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.83-2.71). These findings support population-level characterization of digital exclusion but not prospective or individual-level risk prediction without external validation.
Related
- The application of explainable machine learning for the identification of MASLD in non-obese populations
- Timing and Context Features in Machine Learning Classification of Inter-Patient ECG Heartbeats on the MIT-BIH Benchmark
- CT Radiomics and Machine Learning for Three-Class Bone Density Classification: An Exploratory Comparison Across Lumbar Vertebral Levels
- Machine learning-based association analysis and cross-sectional classification of physical exercise behaviors and mental health among vocational medical students
- Advancing Lumbar Disc Herniation Classification from MRI Using an Efficient and Reproducible Classical Machine Learning Framework
BibTeX
@article{wan2026machine,
title = {{Machine learning classification of digital exclusion in ageing populations across five international cohorts.}},
author = {Shenwei Wan and Cong Fu and Can Lu and Zhiwen Ding and Shiyuan Wang and Lei Zhou and Xiaoguang Lei},
journal = {NPJ digital medicine},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1038/s41746-026-03268-z},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42919895},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Machine learning classification of digital exclusion in ageing populations across five international cohorts.
AU - Shenwei Wan
AU - Cong Fu
AU - Can Lu
AU - Zhiwen Ding
AU - Shiyuan Wang
AU - Lei Zhou
AU - Xiaoguang Lei
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - NPJ digital medicine
DO - 10.1038/s41746-026-03268-z
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42919895
AB - Digital exclusion may limit access to increasingly digital health and public services, yet its cross-national structure and model transportability remain uncertain. We analysed harmonised cross-sectional data from 71,689 middle-aged and older adults in CHARLS, ELSA, HRS, MHAS and SHARE. Digital exclusion was defined as no reported internet or email use, a proxy for basic digital participation. Gradient Boosting discriminated concurrent exclusion with AUCs of 0.734-0.850, but logistic regression performed similarly (0.721-0.846; differences 0.001-0.013). Within SHARE, descriptive country-level exclusion ranged from 20.1% in Denmark to 79.2% in Poland. Leave-one-cohort-out validation showed partial transportability, with mean AUC attenuation of 0.026. Cross-fitted classification scores were associated with concurrent depression (pooled adjusted OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.83-2.71). These findings support population-level characterization of digital exclusion but not prospective or individual-level risk prediction without external validation.
SN - 2398-6352
ER -