Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0EarthArXiv

Hydroclimatic change reorganizes karst spring discharge in the Alpine region across discharge regimes and karst-system properties

Abstract

Karst springs are important water resources for the Alpine region and are particularly sensitive to hydroclimatic change due to their comparably short response times. Yet how their hydroclimatic responses differ among discharge regimes and karst systems with different storage properties remains poorly understood. We analyzed 85 karst springs across the wider Alpine region over 2003-2022 to assess how recent trends in discharge, precipitation, and temperature vary across (i) contrasting discharge regimes and (ii) karst-system response types. To this end, we performed clustering based on discharge seasonality and derived three response types using an established karst-system classification framework. Trends in annual, seasonal, and monthly hydrometeorological variables, as well as in the magnitude and timing of low and high flows, were assessed using the modified Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator. Results showed that seasonal flow redistribution was more pronounced than annual discharge change, with widespread increases in winter discharge. Responses differed strongly among the four identified discharge regimes. Winter-pluvial springs in the peri-Alpine region tended toward decreasing spring and summer discharge and increasing winter discharge, resulting in increasing seasonality, with these changes largely associated with precipitation trends. Low and high flows showed corresponding changes, with decreasing low-flow and increasing high-flow magnitudes. In contrast, snow-influenced springs in the core Alpine region showed decreasing seasonality, characterized by mostly increasing winter discharge and decreasing summer discharge, consistent with reduced snow storage and earlier snowmelt. Low-flow magnitudes generally increased, and low-flow occurrence shifted earlier. Thus, these contrasting seasonal shifts suggest that winter water-availability constraints may be reduced in the core Alpine region, whereas reduced summer discharge may increasingly constrain water availability in the peri-Alpine region. Discharge trend patterns were more clearly structured by discharge regime than by karst-system properties. However, trend magnitudes and variability among springs generally decreased from faster- to slower-responding systems. Overall, karst springs in the wider Alpine region respond clearly but heterogeneously to hydroclimatic change, highlighting their value as regional climate indicators and the need for sustained long-term monitoring.

Related

  1. Hydroclimatic controls and interaction-driven sensitivity of reference evapotranspiration across Indian climate regimes
    A. K. Nayak, N. M. Jeepsa, S. Pradhan +8
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  2. Shifts in Rossby wave regimes via the change of group velocity with zonal jets
    Zhixiang Li, Jianhua Lu, Yimin Liu +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  3. Asymptotic behavior of lidar scattering properties of absorbing dust aerosols across Rayleigh and geometrical-optics regimes: theory and implications
    Anthony La Luna, Zhibo Zhang, Qianqian Song +3
    Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedClimate scienceCrossref
  4. Integration of multi-source hydroclimatic variables for enhanced drought monitoring
    Muhammad Salman, Mohamed A. E. Khalefa, Walaa A. A. Ismael +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textClimate scienceCrossref
  5. Diurnally asymmetric warming and hydroclimatic stress structure alpine ecosystem vulnerability in the Three-River headwaters region
    Wenxu Cao, Zhenqi Yang, Qinghe Li
    Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textClimate scienceDOAJ
BibTeX
@misc{joger2026hydroclimatic,
  title = {{Hydroclimatic change reorganizes karst spring discharge in the Alpine region across discharge regimes and karst-system properties}},
  author = {Felix Joger and Zhao Chen and Andreas Hartmann and Stefan Broda},
  howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31223/x54j86},
  url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15602/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Hydroclimatic change reorganizes karst spring discharge in the Alpine region across discharge regimes and karst-system properties
AU  - Felix Joger
AU  - Zhao Chen
AU  - Andreas Hartmann
AU  - Stefan Broda
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - EarthArXiv
DO  - 10.31223/x54j86
UR  - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/15602/
AB  - Karst springs are important water resources for the Alpine region and are particularly sensitive to hydroclimatic change due to their comparably short response times. Yet how their hydroclimatic responses differ among discharge regimes and karst systems with different storage properties remains poorly understood. We analyzed 85 karst springs across the wider Alpine region over 2003-2022 to assess how recent trends in discharge, precipitation, and temperature vary across (i) contrasting discharge regimes and (ii) karst-system response types. To this end, we performed clustering based on discharge seasonality and derived three response types using an established karst-system classification framework. Trends in annual, seasonal, and monthly hydrometeorological variables, as well as in the magnitude and timing of low and high flows, were assessed using the modified Mann–Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator. Results showed that seasonal flow redistribution was more pronounced than annual discharge change, with widespread increases in winter discharge. Responses differed strongly among the four identified discharge regimes. Winter-pluvial springs in the peri-Alpine region tended toward decreasing spring and summer discharge and increasing winter discharge, resulting in increasing seasonality, with these changes largely associated with precipitation trends. Low and high flows showed corresponding changes, with decreasing low-flow and increasing high-flow magnitudes. In contrast, snow-influenced springs in the core Alpine region showed decreasing seasonality, characterized by mostly increasing winter discharge and decreasing summer discharge, consistent with reduced snow storage and earlier snowmelt. Low-flow magnitudes generally increased, and low-flow occurrence shifted earlier. Thus, these contrasting seasonal shifts suggest that winter water-availability constraints may be reduced in the core Alpine region, whereas reduced summer discharge may increasingly constrain water availability in the peri-Alpine region. Discharge trend patterns were more clearly structured by discharge regime than by karst-system properties. However, trend magnitudes and variability among springs generally decreased from faster- to slower-responding systems. Overall, karst springs in the wider Alpine region respond clearly but heterogeneously to hydroclimatic change, highlighting their value as regional climate indicators and the need for sustained long-term monitoring.
ER  -