Assessing the impact of phylogenetic reconstruction error on genetic reassortment inference in segmented viruses
- 1Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
- 2Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
- 3Department of Computer Science, Western University, Rm. 355, Middlesex College, London, Canada.
Abstract
Recombination is an important process in the evolution of RNA viruses. For viruses with segmented genomes, recombination can occur by reassortment of entire genomic segments. This process has played a significant role in the adaptation and spread of influenza viruses with novel genomic combinations, i.e., antigenic shifts. Reassortment is usually identified by discrepancies between the topologies of trees reconstructed from different genomic segments, e.g., subtree prune and regraft (SPR) rearrangements. However, this phylogenetic discordance can also result from errors in tree reconstruction due to insufficient information. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of phylogenetic reconstruction error to the inference of reassortment events from influenza A virus (IAV) genomes from avian hosts. We curated a dataset of 11,795 complete avian H5Nx IAV genomes and sampled subsets of HA sequences with different expected levels of reconstruction error. Next, we simulated molecular evolution along the trees reconstructed from these HA samples, varying rates of evolution and sequence lengths to correspond to the other genomic segments. Because these simulations had no reassortment, any phylogenetic discordance identified from the resulting trees must be caused by reconstruction error. We found that simulations from random samples yielded about 32% as many SPRs as obtained from real data. This false positive rate was reduced to 4% when simulating trees from the most genetically divergent subset of HA sequences. By modifying the simulated trees with SPR rearrangements, we observed a false negative rate of 8.5%, which increased with the number of SPRs per tree. Overall, we found that reassortment can be substantially overestimated from phylogenetic discordance, underscoring the need to account for phylogenetic uncertainty and sampling design when analyzing IAV datasets for reassortment.
Related
- Assessing the robustness of SNaQ to violations induced by high-level phylogenetic networks
- How characters recoding, characters rescoring, and matrix combination weaken phylogenetic and taxonomic inference: the case of Scythicorhinus
- Bayesian phylogenetic inference accounting for recombination in whole bacterial genomes
- Phylogenetic Inference and the Stickiness of Fréchet Means, via Precise Asymptotics of an Embedded Random Walk
- Biopsy-aware phylogenetic reconstruction from longitudinal single-cell copy number profiles
BibTeX
@article{castelansanchez2026assessing,
title = {{Assessing the impact of phylogenetic reconstruction error on genetic reassortment inference in segmented viruses}},
author = {Hugo G Castelán-Sánchez and Art F Y Poon},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360852},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360852},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Assessing the impact of phylogenetic reconstruction error on genetic reassortment inference in segmented viruses
AU - Hugo G Castelán-Sánchez
AU - Art F Y Poon
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/22
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360852
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360852
AB - Recombination is an important process in the evolution of RNA viruses. For viruses with segmented genomes, recombination can occur by reassortment of entire genomic segments. This process has played a significant role in the adaptation and spread of influenza viruses with novel genomic combinations, i.e., antigenic shifts. Reassortment is usually identified by discrepancies between the topologies of trees reconstructed from different genomic segments, e.g., subtree prune and regraft (SPR) rearrangements. However, this phylogenetic discordance can also result from errors in tree reconstruction due to insufficient information. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of phylogenetic reconstruction error to the inference of reassortment events from influenza A virus (IAV) genomes from avian hosts. We curated a dataset of 11,795 complete avian H5Nx IAV genomes and sampled subsets of HA sequences with different expected levels of reconstruction error. Next, we simulated molecular evolution along the trees reconstructed from these HA samples, varying rates of evolution and sequence lengths to correspond to the other genomic segments. Because these simulations had no reassortment, any phylogenetic discordance identified from the resulting trees must be caused by reconstruction error. We found that simulations from random samples yielded about 32% as many SPRs as obtained from real data. This false positive rate was reduced to 4% when simulating trees from the most genetically divergent subset of HA sequences. By modifying the simulated trees with SPR rearrangements, we observed a false negative rate of 8.5%, which increased with the number of SPRs per tree. Overall, we found that reassortment can be substantially overestimated from phylogenetic discordance, underscoring the need to account for phylogenetic uncertainty and sampling design when analyzing IAV datasets for reassortment.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -