Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC 4.0EcoEvoRxiv

Migration timing depends on balancing the risks of exposure and escape from infection

Abstract

As anthropogenic changes alter animal migration routes, understanding the consequences of these changes is critical for conservation. One consequence of altered migratory routes is exposure to infection by new parasites (i.e., migratory exposure). Theoretical models aiming to understand migration-infection dynamics typically have focused on infection-related benefits (i.e., migratory escape) to migration and have not included migratory exposure as a cost, which limits our ability to understand how changes to migration might be constrained by infection-related costs. Here, we explore one way animals cope with altered migratory routes: by adjusting the amount of time spent in different environments to minimize overall intensity of parasite infection. We develop a model of one host moving between two environments (each with an environmentally-specific parasite). We find that if the function describing parasite infection accumulation over time is accelerating, the optimal strategy is for hosts to split their time between environments. However, if both parasite accumulation functions are saturating, it is best for hosts to stick to a single environment. This model generates novel predictions about how time spent by migratory species in different environments is shaped by coinfection with multiple parasites.

Related

  1. Designing a multifunctional peptide with biofilm-disrupting and fibroblast migration-promoting activities for infection management
    Hye-Ran Park, Jin Wook Oh, Sukin Jeong +3
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textMicrobiologyCrossref
  2. Timing dependent associations of acute phase laboratory and antibody parameters with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in unvaccinated individuals
    Shinya Yamamoto, Takeshi Ohtsuka, Yoshiro Kishi +7
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyCrossref
  3. Myeloid cell reprogramming drives enhanced defense against Streptococcus pneumoniae lung infection following exposure to commensal Prevotella.
    Sara N Stoner, Eric D Larson, Sam Fulte +5
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of AmericaPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedImmunologyEurope PMC
  4. Prior Bombyx mori latent virus exposure enhances subsequent BmNPV infection and suppresses antiviral responses in the silkworm, Bombyx mori
    N. Abubakar, H. Mon, T. Fujii +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  5. Gestational benzene exposure programs sex-specific neuroimmune responses to postnatal viral infection
    Anthony Maxwell, Annie Thy Nguyen, DruAnne Maxwell +6
    Frontiers in immunologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMCCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{shaw2026migration,
  title = {{Migration timing depends on balancing the risks of exposure and escape from infection}},
  author = {Allison Shaw and Raine MacArthur-Waltz and Sandra Ann Binning},
  howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.32942/x2998j},
  url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15006/},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Migration timing depends on balancing the risks of exposure and escape from infection
AU  - Allison Shaw
AU  - Raine MacArthur-Waltz
AU  - Sandra Ann Binning
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/15
PB  - EcoEvoRxiv
DO  - 10.32942/x2998j
UR  - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15006/
AB  - As anthropogenic changes alter animal migration routes, understanding the consequences of these changes is critical for conservation. One consequence of altered migratory routes is exposure to infection by new parasites (i.e., migratory exposure). Theoretical models aiming to understand migration-infection dynamics typically have focused on infection-related benefits (i.e., migratory escape) to migration and have not included migratory exposure as a cost, which limits our ability to understand how changes to migration might be constrained by infection-related costs. Here, we explore one way animals cope with altered migratory routes: by adjusting the amount of time spent in different environments to minimize overall intensity of parasite infection. We develop a model of one host moving between two environments (each with an environmentally-specific parasite). We find that if the function describing parasite infection accumulation over time is accelerating, the optimal strategy is for hosts to split their time between environments. However, if both parasite accumulation functions are saturating, it is best for hosts to stick to a single environment. This model generates novel predictions about how time spent by migratory species in different environments is shaped by coinfection with multiple parasites.
ER  -