Krasheninnikov eruption facilitated by M8.8 Kamchatka earthquake and hidden critical state
Abstract
Large earthquakes can trigger volcanic eruptions, but the required conditions and mechanisms remain uncertain. Here, we investigate whether the August 2025 eruption of Krasheninnikov volcano, Russia, was facilitated by the July 29th, 2025, Mw 8.8 Kamchatka megathrust earthquake. InSAR observations from 2016 to 2025 show no pre-earthquake inflation and satellite SO2 data indicate no detectable pre-eruptive degassing, suggesting apparent pre-earthquake, and pre-eruption, volcanic quiescence. Following the earthquake, InSAR data reveal a dyke intrusion beginning August 1st, shortly before eruption onset on August 2nd. Deformation modelling indicates a ~3.2x107 m3 dyke fed by a ~6-km-deep reservoir containing compressible, gas-rich magma. Stress modelling shows that static seismic stress and strain changes were small, mechanically mixed, and unlikely to have directly caused the dyke intrusion and eruption. Dynamic stresses were larger, reaching ~1.0±0.6 MPa, but still probably insufficient to trigger direct magma reservoir failure. Instead, the prolonged earthquake shaking likely promoted time-dependent volatile exsolution, bubble growth, and eventual reservoir destabilisation in a system already mechanically susceptible to failure. We show that apparently quiescent volcanoes may conceal hidden critical states prone to seismic perturbation, particularly in extensional arc settings with volatile-rich magmas exposed to repeated megathrust earthquakes.
Related
- How the 29 July 2025 M8.8 Kamchatka Earthquake Shook the Ionosphere Over Japan
- Key Parameters for the Ionospheric Detection of Tsunamis From the 29 July 2025 Kamchatka Event
- Differences among preparatory processes preceding major earthquakes in Kamchatka, 2014-2025, including the MW 8.8 event
- Estimation of eruption source parameters based on field data and numerical modeling: application to the 1993 eruption of Lascar volcano, Chile
- Dendrochronology and the date of the Thera volcanic eruption
BibTeX
@misc{hickey2026krasheninnikov,
title = {{Krasheninnikov eruption facilitated by M8.8 Kamchatka earthquake and hidden critical state}},
author = {James Hickey and Rami Alshembari and Lorenzo Mantiloni and Gilles Seropian and Yasser Maghsoudi and Gino Gonzalez and Brendan T. McCormick Kilbride and Ben Esse and Mike Burton},
howpublished = {EarthArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31223/x5479g},
url = {https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/14750/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Krasheninnikov eruption facilitated by M8.8 Kamchatka earthquake and hidden critical state
AU - James Hickey
AU - Rami Alshembari
AU - Lorenzo Mantiloni
AU - Gilles Seropian
AU - Yasser Maghsoudi
AU - Gino Gonzalez
AU - Brendan T. McCormick Kilbride
AU - Ben Esse
AU - Mike Burton
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/02
PB - EarthArXiv
DO - 10.31223/x5479g
UR - https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/14750/
AB - Large earthquakes can trigger volcanic eruptions, but the required conditions and mechanisms remain uncertain. Here, we investigate whether the August 2025 eruption of Krasheninnikov volcano, Russia, was facilitated by the July 29th, 2025, Mw 8.8 Kamchatka megathrust earthquake. InSAR observations from 2016 to 2025 show no pre-earthquake inflation and satellite SO2 data indicate no detectable pre-eruptive degassing, suggesting apparent pre-earthquake, and pre-eruption, volcanic quiescence. Following the earthquake, InSAR data reveal a dyke intrusion beginning August 1st, shortly before eruption onset on August 2nd. Deformation modelling indicates a ~3.2x107 m3 dyke fed by a ~6-km-deep reservoir containing compressible, gas-rich magma. Stress modelling shows that static seismic stress and strain changes were small, mechanically mixed, and unlikely to have directly caused the dyke intrusion and eruption. Dynamic stresses were larger, reaching ~1.0±0.6 MPa, but still probably insufficient to trigger direct magma reservoir failure. Instead, the prolonged earthquake shaking likely promoted time-dependent volatile exsolution, bubble growth, and eventual reservoir destabilisation in a system already mechanically susceptible to failure. We show that apparently quiescent volcanoes may conceal hidden critical states prone to seismic perturbation, particularly in extensional arc settings with volatile-rich magmas exposed to repeated megathrust earthquakes.
ER -