Timeliness of the outbreak surveillance and response process: a retrospective cross-sectional multicountry assessment in the WHO African Region
- 1World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
- 2EPR, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
Abstract
Introduction: Early detection and response to outbreaks are among the highest expectations of public health responsibility. However, in most WHO African countries, this commitment often encounters persistent challenges that reflect the weakness of health systems and necessitate specific analyses to learn lessons and make timely decisions. Analysing timeliness from detection to response offers a particular advantage by highlighting the different delays recorded at each stage, which guide on the identification of challenges that may arise within the system.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of outbreaks reported in the WHO African Region in 2024 was conducted. This study focused on a descriptive analysis of the reported outbreaks and the computation of median time for seven key indicators associated with four core milestones: detection, notification, investigation and initiation of response.
Results: Most reported outbreaks were caused by viral agent, with vaccine-preventable diseases being the most frequently reported category. Overall medians (IQR) were 4 (1–7) days for detection, 0 (0–2) days for notification, 0 (0–0) days for sample collection, 1 (0–2) days for sample reception, 2 (1–4) days for laboratory turnaround, 3 (1–8) days for laboratory confirmation and 1 (0–8) days for response initiation. Significant delays were noted for specific diseases, and at particular stages of the surveillance-to-response cascade, highlighting persistent gaps and weaknesses in outbreak detection and response systems across the Region.
Conclusion: Significant delays for specific diseases were noted, emphasising bottlenecks that require strong and sustained commitment from governments and an investment in resources.
Related
- Respiratory pathogen epidemiology in children under 5 years hospitalized with acute respiratory infections in Qingdao, China: a retrospective, single-center, repeated cross-sectional surveillance study
- Timeliness of Primary Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer in Queensland: A 10 Year Rural–Urban Retrospective Cohort Study
- Colorectal cancer awareness among university students in Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia: a multicountry cross-sectional study
- Immunization timeliness and its determinants among young children in Baghdad, Iraq: A cross-sectional study using documented vaccination cards
- Real-world multicountry programmatic assessment of contact investigation for people with drug-resistant tuberculosis: evidence from five high-burden countries
BibTeX
@article{moussana2026timeliness,
title = {{Timeliness of the outbreak surveillance and response process: a retrospective cross-sectional multicountry assessment in the WHO African Region}},
author = {Fleury Hybriel Moussana and Mamadou Saliou Kalifa Diallo and Kofi Emmanuel Dzotsi and Nicksy Gumede and Charles Okot and Etien Koua and Otim Ramadan and Dick Damas Chamla and Marie Roseline Darnycka Belizaire},
journal = {BMJ Public Health},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1136/bmjph-2026-005377},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2026-005377},
note = {CC BY 3.0-IGO},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Timeliness of the outbreak surveillance and response process: a retrospective cross-sectional multicountry assessment in the WHO African Region
AU - Fleury Hybriel Moussana
AU - Mamadou Saliou Kalifa Diallo
AU - Kofi Emmanuel Dzotsi
AU - Nicksy Gumede
AU - Charles Okot
AU - Etien Koua
AU - Otim Ramadan
AU - Dick Damas Chamla
AU - Marie Roseline Darnycka Belizaire
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - BMJ Public Health
DO - 10.1136/bmjph-2026-005377
UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2026-005377
AB - Introduction: Early detection and response to outbreaks are among the highest expectations of public health responsibility. However, in most WHO African countries, this commitment often encounters persistent challenges that reflect the weakness of health systems and necessitate specific analyses to learn lessons and make timely decisions. Analysing timeliness from detection to response offers a particular advantage by highlighting the different delays recorded at each stage, which guide on the identification of challenges that may arise within the system. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of outbreaks reported in the WHO African Region in 2024 was conducted. This study focused on a descriptive analysis of the reported outbreaks and the computation of median time for seven key indicators associated with four core milestones: detection, notification, investigation and initiation of response. Results: Most reported outbreaks were caused by viral agent, with vaccine-preventable diseases being the most frequently reported category. Overall medians (IQR) were 4 (1–7) days for detection, 0 (0–2) days for notification, 0 (0–0) days for sample collection, 1 (0–2) days for sample reception, 2 (1–4) days for laboratory turnaround, 3 (1–8) days for laboratory confirmation and 1 (0–8) days for response initiation. Significant delays were noted for specific diseases, and at particular stages of the surveillance-to-response cascade, highlighting persistent gaps and weaknesses in outbreak detection and response systems across the Region. Conclusion: Significant delays for specific diseases were noted, emphasising bottlenecks that require strong and sustained commitment from governments and an investment in resources.
SN - 2753-4294
ER -