Catalyst–Support Interactions in Carbon–Inorganic Hybrid Catalysts for Biomass Valorization: Interfacial Chemistry, Stability, and Regeneration
- 1Qi S.r.l., Via Monte d’Oro, 2/A, 00071 Pomezia, Italy
- 2Research Direction, Universidad Ecotec, Km 13.5 Samborondón, Samborondón 092302, Ecuador
Abstract
Carbon–inorganic hybrid catalysts offer tunable surface chemistry, high active-phase dispersion, improved electron and mass transport, and enhanced opportunities for catalyst recovery and regeneration. Their performance in biomass valorization, however, depends strongly on the physicochemical interactions established at the interface between the carbonaceous support and the inorganic catalytic phase. This review examines catalyst–support interactions in hybrid systems based on biochar, activated carbon, graphene-related materials, carbon nanotubes, and hydrothermal carbons combined with metals, metal oxides, zeolites, layered double hydroxides, ferrites, perovskites, and related inorganic phases. The roles of surface functional groups, defects, oxygen vacancies, acid–base interactions, charge transfer, metal anchoring, confinement, and strong metal–support interactions are critically evaluated using an evidence hierarchy that distinguishes correlation from mechanistic proof. Particular emphasis is placed on quantitative links between interfacial descriptors and catalytic activity, selectivity, stability, coke resistance, sintering, leaching, and regenerability. Applications in hydrolysis, dehydration, esterification, transesterification, hydrogenation, hydrodeoxygenation, reforming, pyrolysis-vapor upgrading, and the conversion of lignocellulosic intermediates into fuels and platform chemicals are compared. A focused levulinic-acid-to-γ-valerolactone case study is used to extract transferable design rules from quantitative literature data. Spectroscopic, microscopic, thermal, electrochemical, in situ, and operando methods are compared, together with kinetic and computational approaches. Finally, the review identifies current limitations in standardization, realistic feedstocks, continuous processing, material closure, techno-economic assessment, life-cycle assessment, and scale-up, and proposes a minimum reporting framework for predictive design of durable carbon–inorganic catalysts for circular biorefineries.
Related
- Controlling Interfacial and Bulk Charge Transport in Exsolution Catalysts for High-Activity Water Oxidation
- Valorization of Coal Fly Ash into Fe-FAU Catalysts: Targeted Iron Recovery and Fly Ash Matrix Effects in Methane-to-Methanol Conversion
- Interfacial H relay and site regeneration in Mn single atom-Ru cluster hybrids for efficient alkaline HER
- Relating solute interactions to interfacial properties
- Exploiting Differences in Molecular Interactions for Selective PFAS Separation from Natural Organic Matter during Ion-Exchange Regeneration
BibTeX
@article{bellucci2026catalystsupport,
title = {{Catalyst–Support Interactions in Carbon–Inorganic Hybrid Catalysts for Biomass Valorization: Interfacial Chemistry, Stability, and Regeneration}},
author = {Stefano Bellucci},
journal = {Catalysts},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/catal16100912},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/16/10/912},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Catalyst–Support Interactions in Carbon–Inorganic Hybrid Catalysts for Biomass Valorization: Interfacial Chemistry, Stability, and Regeneration
AU - Stefano Bellucci
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/15
JO - Catalysts
DO - 10.3390/catal16100912
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/16/10/912
AB - Carbon–inorganic hybrid catalysts offer tunable surface chemistry, high active-phase dispersion, improved electron and mass transport, and enhanced opportunities for catalyst recovery and regeneration. Their performance in biomass valorization, however, depends strongly on the physicochemical interactions established at the interface between the carbonaceous support and the inorganic catalytic phase. This review examines catalyst–support interactions in hybrid systems based on biochar, activated carbon, graphene-related materials, carbon nanotubes, and hydrothermal carbons combined with metals, metal oxides, zeolites, layered double hydroxides, ferrites, perovskites, and related inorganic phases. The roles of surface functional groups, defects, oxygen vacancies, acid–base interactions, charge transfer, metal anchoring, confinement, and strong metal–support interactions are critically evaluated using an evidence hierarchy that distinguishes correlation from mechanistic proof. Particular emphasis is placed on quantitative links between interfacial descriptors and catalytic activity, selectivity, stability, coke resistance, sintering, leaching, and regenerability. Applications in hydrolysis, dehydration, esterification, transesterification, hydrogenation, hydrodeoxygenation, reforming, pyrolysis-vapor upgrading, and the conversion of lignocellulosic intermediates into fuels and platform chemicals are compared. A focused levulinic-acid-to-γ-valerolactone case study is used to extract transferable design rules from quantitative literature data. Spectroscopic, microscopic, thermal, electrochemical, in situ, and operando methods are compared, together with kinetic and computational approaches. Finally, the review identifies current limitations in standardization, realistic feedstocks, continuous processing, material closure, techno-economic assessment, life-cycle assessment, and scale-up, and proposes a minimum reporting framework for predictive design of durable carbon–inorganic catalysts for circular biorefineries.
SN - 2073-4344
ER -