Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 59 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecules

Traditional Processing of Arum maculatum L. and Apparent α-Amylase Inhibition: An Exploratory In Vitro and In Silico Study

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Analytical Chemistry, Hamidiye Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, 34668 İstanbul, Türkiye
  2. 2Hamidiye Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, 34668 İstanbul, Türkiye
  3. 3Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, 34220 İstanbul, Türkiye
  4. 4Department of Biochemistry, Hamidiye Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, 34668 İstanbul, Türkiye
  5. 5Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Altınbaş University, Bakırköy Health Campus, 34145 İstanbul, Türkiye

Abstract

Arum maculatum L. is a traditionally consumed but toxic and irritant plant that must be processed before use. This exploratory study examined whether three preparations—an ethanol:water (80:20, v/v) extract of dried material (E1), a corresponding extract of fresh material (E2) and an aqueous decoction of fresh material (E3) mirroring traditional boiling—differ in apparent α-amylase inhibition, and whether their previously reported phenolic marker profiles (high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection, HPLC–PDA) account for these differences. Inhibition of Aspergillus oryzae α-amylase was measured by the starch–iodine method at a single extract concentration and two enzyme loadings, using one extract per preparation and analytical triplicates. All extracts gave higher apparent inhibition values (75.13–90.80%) than the assay-internal acarbose control (67.28–68.15%) at the same nominal mass concentration (40 µg/mL), with E3 highest at the higher enzyme loading. The previously quantified markers did not account for this pattern. Docking against fungal (3VX0, 7TAA) and human (2QV4, 4GQR) α-amylases placed all markers in the catalytic cleft, a hypothesis-generating result that does not establish binding affinity. These descriptive differences indicate that processing is associated with different apparent α-amylase inhibition, whereas the active constituents, possible assay interference and the safety of the preparations remain to be established.

Related

  1. Olive Leaves for Functional Herbal Infusions: Effects of Post-Harvest Processing on Bioactive Properties, α-Amylase Inhibition Activity and Consumer Safety
    Liliana Hnatova, Zuzana Knazicka, Eva Kovacikova +9
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOrganic chemistryCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. Interplay of apparent coherent-domain size, geometrical relative density and oxygen annealing in the electrical and thermal transport of Ta-doped SnO2 ceramics
    Thi Thanh Xuan Vo, Thanh Binh Nguyen, Nita Dragoe +1
    Materials Chemistry and PhysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textMaterials & polymersHAL
  3. Streptavidin-Biotin Binding is Intrinsically Non-Cooperative, but Experimental Artefacts Can Induce Apparent Positive Cooperativity
    Malavika Kayyil Veedu, Eléonore Martenne Duplan, Saurabh Rai +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryBiological & medical physicsarXiv
  4. Effect of Melt-Mixing Duration on the Thermal Degradation and Apparent Activation Energy of Low-Loading PS/NiFe2O4 Nanocomposites: A Sensitivity-Assessed Kinetic Analysis
    Aytekin Ulutaş
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Materials & polymersCrossref
  5. Mixture–Process Design and Multiresponse Optimization of Starch–Gelatin Films Containing Nopal-Opuntia spp. Mucilage: Mechanical Properties and Apparent Mass Loss
    Juan Paredes, Germán Flores, Cristian Pérez-Salinas +1
    PolymersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ozdemir2026traditional,
  title = {{Traditional Processing of Arum maculatum L. and Apparent α-Amylase Inhibition: An Exploratory In Vitro and In Silico Study}},
  author = {Zafer Ömer Özdemir and Ezgi Keskin and Mustafa Niğde and Duygu Mısırlı and Ebru Özdemir Nath and Mahfuz Elmastaş},
  journal = {Molecules},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.3390/molecules31213994},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/21/3994},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Traditional Processing of Arum maculatum L. and Apparent α-Amylase Inhibition: An Exploratory In Vitro and In Silico Study
AU  - Zafer Ömer Özdemir
AU  - Ezgi Keskin
AU  - Mustafa Niğde
AU  - Duygu Mısırlı
AU  - Ebru Özdemir Nath
AU  - Mahfuz Elmastaş
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
JO  - Molecules
DO  - 10.3390/molecules31213994
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/21/3994
AB  - Arum maculatum L. is a traditionally consumed but toxic and irritant plant that must be processed before use. This exploratory study examined whether three preparations—an ethanol:water (80:20, v/v) extract of dried material (E1), a corresponding extract of fresh material (E2) and an aqueous decoction of fresh material (E3) mirroring traditional boiling—differ in apparent α-amylase inhibition, and whether their previously reported phenolic marker profiles (high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection, HPLC–PDA) account for these differences. Inhibition of Aspergillus oryzae α-amylase was measured by the starch–iodine method at a single extract concentration and two enzyme loadings, using one extract per preparation and analytical triplicates. All extracts gave higher apparent inhibition values (75.13–90.80%) than the assay-internal acarbose control (67.28–68.15%) at the same nominal mass concentration (40 µg/mL), with E3 highest at the higher enzyme loading. The previously quantified markers did not account for this pattern. Docking against fungal (3VX0, 7TAA) and human (2QV4, 4GQR) α-amylases placed all markers in the catalytic cleft, a hypothesis-generating result that does not establish binding affinity. These descriptive differences indicate that processing is associated with different apparent α-amylase inhibition, whereas the active constituents, possible assay interference and the safety of the preparations remain to be established.
SN  - 1420-3049
ER  -