Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0BMJ Open

Determination of central pain modulation biomarkers to characterise patients with cancer and refractory pain: protocol for a cross-sectional study

4 affiliations
  1. 1FIDIS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  2. 2IIS Galicia Sur, Vigo, Spain
  3. 3Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  4. 4Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Abstract

Introduction: Pain is one of the most prevalent and disabling oncological symptoms, but its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Most research has focused on peripheral mechanisms, while central pain modulation has been poorly explored. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and electroencephalography (EEG) provide non-invasive approaches to assess central pain processing but the evidence using those approaches in patients with cancer is limited. This study protocol aims to identify and validate central biomarkers of pain perception and modulation (QST and EEG) and the role of moderator variables to better characterise patients with cancer pain.

Methods and analysis: This study protocol describes a multicentre, cross-sectional, case–control study that will include a minimum of 470 ambulatory patients with cancer, including 313 with oncological pain and 157 without pain. Participants will be recruited taking into account age, sex and cancer type (lung, breast, pancreas, prostate and colon). All participants will perform a single face-to-face assessment that will include sociodemographic and clinical data, QST (pain modulation and inhibitory pain mechanisms, temporal summation and pain thresholds) and EEG (at rest and in response to thermal nociceptive stimuli) assessment and administration of questionnaires (pain, quality of life, fatigue, sleep, mood, etc). Statistical modelling and machine learning approaches will be used to investigate pain modulation biomarkers, their association with age and sex and to characterise patients with cancer pain.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has received approval from all local ethics committees of the participating clinical sites. Results will be disseminated through high-impact peer-reviewed journals, international conferences and open data repositories, in compliance with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles, and following the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement for observational case–control studies.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN35887998 .

Related

  1. Integrated oculomics and lipidomics characterise cross-sectional retinal–lipidomic associations in a generally healthy biobank population
    Inam Ullah, Ernesto Elias Vidal Rosas, Imran Razzak +1
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossref
  2. Case Report: Longitudinal evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer’s disease core biomarkers in a case of refractory late-onset epilepsy of unknown etiology
    Takafumi Wada, Akira Kuzuya, Kazuma Koda +6
    Frontiers in aging neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  3. Integrating PET/CT and correlative biomarkers for prospective evaluation of extramedullary disease in relapsed/refractory B-ALL: implications for CAR T-cell therapy
    Mark L. Solter, Yannan J Wang, Grace Li +25
    Journal for Immunotherapy of CancerPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textImmunologyOncologyPMC
  4. Neuroplasticity Biomarkers and Neurotransmitter Modulation in Post-Ischemic Stroke Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review
    Karolina Szymczak-Kumoniewska, Angela Dziedzic, Joanna Saluk +1
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. Determination of muscle activation in upper limb during gait among stroke patients with homolateral limb synkinesis: a cross-sectional analytical pilot study
    Manisha Nayak, Abraham M. Joshua, Shyam Krishnan +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{rubalotero2026determination,
  title = {{Determination of central pain modulation biomarkers to characterise patients with cancer and refractory pain: protocol for a cross-sectional study}},
  author = {Lara Rubal-Otero and Natalia Martinez-Rodriguez and Margarita Álvarez-Rodríguez and Alberto González-Villar and María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña},
  journal = {BMJ Open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121471},
  url = {https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121471},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Determination of central pain modulation biomarkers to characterise patients with cancer and refractory pain: protocol for a cross-sectional study
AU  - Lara Rubal-Otero
AU  - Natalia Martinez-Rodriguez
AU  - Margarita Álvarez-Rodríguez
AU  - Alberto González-Villar
AU  - María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/07
JO  - BMJ Open
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121471
UR  - https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-121471
AB  - Introduction: Pain is one of the most prevalent and disabling oncological symptoms, but its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Most research has focused on peripheral mechanisms, while central pain modulation has been poorly explored. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and electroencephalography (EEG) provide non-invasive approaches to assess central pain processing but the evidence using those approaches in patients with cancer is limited. This study protocol aims to identify and validate central biomarkers of pain perception and modulation (QST and EEG) and the role of moderator variables to better characterise patients with cancer pain.  Methods and analysis: This study protocol describes a multicentre, cross-sectional, case–control study that will include a minimum of 470 ambulatory patients with cancer, including 313 with oncological pain and 157 without pain. Participants will be recruited taking into account age, sex and cancer type (lung, breast, pancreas, prostate and colon). All participants will perform a single face-to-face assessment that will include sociodemographic and clinical data, QST (pain modulation and inhibitory pain mechanisms, temporal summation and pain thresholds) and EEG (at rest and in response to thermal nociceptive stimuli) assessment and administration of questionnaires (pain, quality of life, fatigue, sleep, mood, etc). Statistical modelling and machine learning approaches will be used to investigate pain modulation biomarkers, their association with age and sex and to characterise patients with cancer pain.  Ethics and dissemination: This study has received approval from all local ethics committees of the participating clinical sites. Results will be disseminated through high-impact peer-reviewed journals, international conferences and open data repositories, in compliance with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles, and following the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) statement for observational case–control studies.  Trial registration number: ISRCTN35887998 .
SN  - 2044-6055
SN  - 2044-6055
ER  -