Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
PreprintCC BYmedRxiv

Provider unit costs and cost drivers of in vitro fertilization (IVF) services in a public tertiary hospital in Tanzania: A micro-costing study

  1. 1Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences

Abstract

BackgroundInfertility affects up to 32.0% of couples in sub-Saharan Africa, while access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART), including In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), remains limited by high treatment costs. As Tanzania advances Universal Health Coverage (UHC) through the National Health Insurance Act of 2023, empirical provider cost estimates are needed to inform reimbursement and strategic purchasing. This study estimated the provider unit cost, cost structure, and cost drivers of IVF services at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Tanzania.

MethodsA provider-perspective cross-sectional micro-costing study was conducted at MNH between January and December 2025. Bottom-up micro-costing was applied to direct costs, while top-down allocation was used for capital and indirect costs. All 10 IVF cycles initiated during the study period were included, comprising five completed and five incomplete cycles. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of cost estimates.

ResultsThe total provider cost for five completed IVF cycles was TZS 55,410,375.00 (USD 22,164.15), corresponding to a mean unit cost of TZS 11,082,075.00 (USD 4,432.83) per cycle. Direct costs accounted for 99.92% of the total cost, while indirect costs contributed 0.08%. Monitoring, investigation and ovarian stimulation was the largest treatment-stage cost component (55.13%). Among direct variable costs, drugs and hormones accounted for 52.67%, followed by reagents and media at 33.05%; together, these accounted for 85.72% of direct variable costs and represented the principal recurrent cost drivers. Sensitivity analysis showed that varying drugs and hormones by {+/-}15% changed the estimated provider unit cost from TZS 10,474,000 (USD 4,189.60) to TZS 11,690,125 (USD 4,676.05), while variation in reagents and media changed it from TZS 10,700,550 (USD 4,280.22) to TZS 11,463,600 (USD 4,585.44).

ConclusionIVF service delivery at MNH was predominantly driven by direct clinical resource inputs. Drugs, hormones, reagents and media were the principal recurrent cost drivers. These findings provide empirical evidence to support NHIF reimbursement, strategic purchasing, and resource allocation for publicly financed IVF services in Tanzania.

Related

  1. The cost of treating selected psychiatric conditions from the provider’s perspective in a public tertiary academic hospital in South Africa
    B. Nechombo, M. Sibanda, L. Makhele +1
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  2. Prevalence and associated factors of chronic kidney disease among hypertensive patients attending cardiac clinic at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
    Jamila A Mwinyimvua, Benedicto T Mgala, Jacqueline G Shoo +2
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  3. Outcomes of infants undergoing surgery for oesophageal atresia and trachea-oesophageal fistula at a tertiary referral hospital in Tanzania
    Masawa Klint Nyamuryekung’e, Kasusu Klint Nyamuryekung’e, Rajabu Athumani Bakari +2
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textDevelopmental biologyPhysiologyPLOS
  4. Phenomenology, Etiology, and Severity of Delirium Among Patients Referred to Consultation-liaison Psychiatry Services in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-sectional Study
    Priyanka Jha, Arun Bhat P, Shrinivasa Bhat U
    Indian journal of psychological medicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  5. Interpretable machine learning for identifying cost drivers of inpatient traditional Chinese medicine services in a tertiary hospital in China
    Xi Li, Shouyan Chen, Mei Gong +3
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefPMC
BibTeX
@misc{sanga2026provider,
  title = {{Provider unit costs and cost drivers of in vitro fertilization (IVF) services in a public tertiary hospital in Tanzania: A micro-costing study}},
  author = {G. E. Sanga and M. Z. Alimohamed and A. Z. Kagaigai and P. G. Mujinja},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.20.26365987},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.26365987v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Provider unit costs and cost drivers of in vitro fertilization (IVF) services in a public tertiary hospital in Tanzania: A micro-costing study
AU  - G. E. Sanga
AU  - M. Z. Alimohamed
AU  - A. Z. Kagaigai
AU  - P. G. Mujinja
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.20.26365987
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.20.26365987v1
AB  - BackgroundInfertility affects up to 32.0% of couples in sub-Saharan Africa, while access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART), including In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), remains limited by high treatment costs. As Tanzania advances Universal Health Coverage (UHC) through the National Health Insurance Act of 2023, empirical provider cost estimates are needed to inform reimbursement and strategic purchasing. This study estimated the provider unit cost, cost structure, and cost drivers of IVF services at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH), Tanzania.  MethodsA provider-perspective cross-sectional micro-costing study was conducted at MNH between January and December 2025. Bottom-up micro-costing was applied to direct costs, while top-down allocation was used for capital and indirect costs. All 10 IVF cycles initiated during the study period were included, comprising five completed and five incomplete cycles. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of cost estimates.  ResultsThe total provider cost for five completed IVF cycles was TZS 55,410,375.00 (USD 22,164.15), corresponding to a mean unit cost of TZS 11,082,075.00 (USD 4,432.83) per cycle. Direct costs accounted for 99.92% of the total cost, while indirect costs contributed 0.08%. Monitoring, investigation and ovarian stimulation was the largest treatment-stage cost component (55.13%). Among direct variable costs, drugs and hormones accounted for 52.67%, followed by reagents and media at 33.05%; together, these accounted for 85.72% of direct variable costs and represented the principal recurrent cost drivers. Sensitivity analysis showed that varying drugs and hormones by {+/-}15% changed the estimated provider unit cost from TZS 10,474,000 (USD 4,189.60) to TZS 11,690,125 (USD 4,676.05), while variation in reagents and media changed it from TZS 10,700,550 (USD 4,280.22) to TZS 11,463,600 (USD 4,585.44).  ConclusionIVF service delivery at MNH was predominantly driven by direct clinical resource inputs. Drugs, hormones, reagents and media were the principal recurrent cost drivers. These findings provide empirical evidence to support NHIF reimbursement, strategic purchasing, and resource allocation for publicly financed IVF services in Tanzania.
ER  -