Universes Here: Many-Worlds as a Change of the Level of Description G
Abstract
The article proposes a new interpretation of parallel universes: they are not located "somewhere far away," but exist in the very same volume of space as our Universe. Different universes are different sets of active elements of reality that we "read" from a single "set" at different levels of description G. The key metaphor is the airport board: the board is one and the same, but by opening different cells we get different symbols.
Formally: Universe U(G) = P(G)(Ω), where P(G) is the projection operator, Ω is the complete set of all degrees of freedom. The transition between universes is a change of the level of description G, not movement in space. This distinguishes the model from Everett's many-worlds interpretation, where branching is irreversible: in the proposed model the transition is reversible.
A comparison is conducted with existing interpretations: Everett's MWI, Tegmark's Multiverse, MIW of Hall, Wiseman, and Deckert, brane worlds in string theory. It is shown that the model occupies a unique niche: not branching, not interaction, not remoteness, but an ontological choice.
Consequences for superluminal communication are discussed: the signal does not fly through a brane but switches to another G. Verifiable consequences are proposed: anomalies in the cosmic microwave background, vacuum fluctuations, indirect markers.
The model is consistent with the principles of the projection ontology of EFOS and resolves the problems of the standard many-worlds interpretation: it does not require infinite energy, does not require postulating irreversible branching.
Key conclusions: parallel universes are here, in one volume; the transition between them is a change of G; the model has verifiable consequences.
Related
- Universes Here: Many-Worlds as a Change of the Ontological Selector S
- Concept "Everything Is Already Here": An Ontological Model of Parallel Universes
- Electrospray ion beam deposition of small peptides on solid surfaces: A molecular level description of the glutathione/copper interface
- Operator-Level Description of Transient Thermal Grating Dynamics Across Transport Regimes
- Persistent level-resolved transmon population after dispersive readout, and the limits of its open-system description
BibTeX
@misc{kotelnikov2026universes,
title = {{Universes Here: Many-Worlds as a Change of the Level of Description G}},
author = {Alexander Yourievitch KOTELNIKOV},
howpublished = {Zenodo},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.23526509},
url = {https://zenodo.org/records/23526509},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Universes Here: Many-Worlds as a Change of the Level of Description G
AU - Alexander Yourievitch KOTELNIKOV
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
PB - Zenodo
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.23526509
UR - https://zenodo.org/records/23526509
AB - The article proposes a new interpretation of parallel universes: they are not located "somewhere far away," but exist in the very same volume of space as our Universe. Different universes are different sets of active elements of reality that we "read" from a single "set" at different levels of description G. The key metaphor is the airport board: the board is one and the same, but by opening different cells we get different symbols. Formally: Universe U(G) = P(G)(Ω), where P(G) is the projection operator, Ω is the complete set of all degrees of freedom. The transition between universes is a change of the level of description G, not movement in space. This distinguishes the model from Everett's many-worlds interpretation, where branching is irreversible: in the proposed model the transition is reversible. A comparison is conducted with existing interpretations: Everett's MWI, Tegmark's Multiverse, MIW of Hall, Wiseman, and Deckert, brane worlds in string theory. It is shown that the model occupies a unique niche: not branching, not interaction, not remoteness, but an ontological choice. Consequences for superluminal communication are discussed: the signal does not fly through a brane but switches to another G. Verifiable consequences are proposed: anomalies in the cosmic microwave background, vacuum fluctuations, indirect markers. The model is consistent with the principles of the projection ontology of EFOS and resolves the problems of the standard many-worlds interpretation: it does not require infinite energy, does not require postulating irreversible branching. Key conclusions: parallel universes are here, in one volume; the transition between them is a change of G; the model has verifiable consequences.
ER -