Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

CodonBench: separating gene context, exon position, and variant-specific component in synonymous-variant classification

  1. 1Intelligent Medicine Institute, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China

Abstract

Background. A synonymous variant leaves the protein unchanged, so a classifier that still separates pathogenic from benign examples must be reading something beyond the protein. Such variants test cleanly what a codon-level model adds to a protein-level one. Methods. We assembled SynPath, a benchmark of ClinVar synonymous variants, and scored frozen representations under two splitting protocols. Under gene-held-out folds whole genes are withheld, and each coding-sequence model is compared against a position-matched control. Results. The models were not trained for this task, so these numbers describe transfer, not designed performance. Random splitting flatters every representation. Once whole genes are held out, they fall into a narrow band near chance, the best at 0.58, and low-rank fine-tuning does not restore the random-split level. A feature that reads no sequence, only the distance from the variant to the nearest exon junction, reaches 0.84 under the same folds, above every neural representation tested. In a protein model the variant-specific component is zero by construction, because both alleles present the same input. In coding-sequence models only the response vector, the difference between the alternate and reference embeddings, keeps signal on unseen genes and beats its position-matched control. Conclusions. Synonymous-variant pathogenicity is predictable mainly from gene identity and from position. Only a small part reflects the variant itself, and only in models that read the coding sequence. Benchmarks judged on random splits will overstate what these models have learned.

Related

  1. TEFAR: a lightweight, configurable framework for semi-automatic artefact component classification in EEG and TMS-EEG
    C. Dimitriadou, N. Furl
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. A Rare Homozygous Synonymous Variant in the ECM1 Gene in a Lipoid Proteinosis Patient.
    Metehan Simsek, Husna Topcu, Kubra Serefoglu Cabuk +5
    Beyoglu eye journalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  3. Synonymous COL7A1 c.6846G>C in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: Oral Phenotypic Expansion and Palatal Ultrastructure
    Piranit Kantaputra, Kittinunt Chotikaew, Thareena Bunnag +7
    International Dental JournalPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textCell biologyDOAJ
  4. Transcriptome reallocation during infection reshapes synonymous codon demand in Botrytis cinerea
    J. Dowell, L. Pradhan, M. Madrigal
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
  5. Synonymous HTT CAA/CCA-loss variants associated with early Huntington disease onset enhance toxicity beyond somatic instability
    G. L. Sequiera, S. C. Gjervan, R. McCallum +16
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsbioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{liang2026codonbench,
  title = {{CodonBench: separating gene context, exon position, and variant-specific component in synonymous-variant classification}},
  author = {Y. Liang and W. Zhu and X. Pan and H. Li},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.08.12.744371},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.12.744371v2},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - CodonBench: separating gene context, exon position, and variant-specific component in synonymous-variant classification
AU  - Y. Liang
AU  - W. Zhu
AU  - X. Pan
AU  - H. Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/12
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.08.12.744371
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.12.744371v2
AB  - Background. A synonymous variant leaves the protein unchanged, so a classifier that still separates pathogenic from benign examples must be reading something beyond the protein. Such variants test cleanly what a codon-level model adds to a protein-level one. Methods. We assembled SynPath, a benchmark of ClinVar synonymous variants, and scored frozen representations under two splitting protocols. Under gene-held-out folds whole genes are withheld, and each coding-sequence model is compared against a position-matched control. Results. The models were not trained for this task, so these numbers describe transfer, not designed performance. Random splitting flatters every representation. Once whole genes are held out, they fall into a narrow band near chance, the best at 0.58, and low-rank fine-tuning does not restore the random-split level. A feature that reads no sequence, only the distance from the variant to the nearest exon junction, reaches 0.84 under the same folds, above every neural representation tested. In a protein model the variant-specific component is zero by construction, because both alleles present the same input. In coding-sequence models only the response vector, the difference between the alternate and reference embeddings, keeps signal on unseen genes and beats its position-matched control. Conclusions. Synonymous-variant pathogenicity is predictable mainly from gene identity and from position. Only a small part reflects the variant itself, and only in models that read the coding sequence. Benchmarks judged on random splits will overstate what these models have learned.
ER  -