Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYFrontiers in neurology

Differential mechanisms of continuous theta burst stimulation and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic tinnitus: preliminary efficacy dissociation by local focalization vs. network dispersion

5 affiliations
  1. 1Hangzhou Normal University , ,
  2. 2Deqing Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University , ,
  3. 3Hangzhou Ninth People's Hospital , ,
  4. 4Zhejiang Cancer Hospital , ,
  5. 5Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University , ,

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to preliminarily compare clinical efficacy and neural mechanisms of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the auditory cortex in chronic subjective tinnitus. Differential effects on tinnitus loudness and distress, as well as the moderating role of disease duration, were explored.

Methods: Twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to cTBS ( n = 16) or rTMS ( n = 13) groups. Neuronavigation-guided stimulation was applied to the individualized auditory cortex peak activation site. Outcome measures included the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, post-treatment, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups. Resting-state fMRI was used to analyze amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo). Functional connectivity (FC) analysis was performed to explore the network-level changes.

Results: Clinically, cTBS was associated with a rapid reduction in VAS-rated tinnitus loudness ( p = 0.004), while low-frequency rTMS demonstrated sustained improvements in THI scores up to the 3-month follow-up ( p = 0.007). Mixed-model ANCOVA yielded significant time-by-group interactions for THI and VAS, verifying different therapeutic profiles between cTBS and rTMS. Resting-state fMRI uncovered separable brain plasticity: cTBS induced focal changes in left auditory cortex, whereas rTMS remodeled extensive limbic-cognitive networks. Two-way ANCOVA confirmed shared left prefrontal interaction signals, supporting stronger prefrontal suppression by cTBS. Baseline tinnitus duration was negatively correlated with 3-month THI improvement rates. Collectively, clinical and dual resting-state imaging results identified separable therapeutic and neuromodulatory signatures of cTBS and low-frequency rTMS.

Conclusion: Our exploratory results suggest that cTBS may facilitate a rapid reduction in tinnitus loudness possibly through focal auditory modulation, while low-frequency rTMS eases persistent tinnitus distress through large-scale network remodeling. Our findings provide preliminary evidence for the divergent prefrontal inhibitory profiles of the two inhibitory protocols. Shorter tinnitus duration predicts better therapeutic outcomes, highlighting the value of early intervention. These exploratory results provide evidence for personalized TMS-based neuromodulation in chronic tinnitus.

Related

  1. Neural substrates of knowledge integration: differential effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on angular gyrus and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex
    Xuan Zhang, Michael Lochner, Karen Joseph +1
    PeerJPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  2. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation in Athletes: Optimizing Athletic Performance and Sleep Quality Through Neuromodulation
    Joanna Stezycka, Kamil Krupa, Michał Kmiecik +9
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Mechanisms of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation
    Marcello Massimini, Angel V. Peterchev, Andreas Vlachos +1
    Physiological ReviewsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text15 citedNeurologyOpenAlex
  4. Accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression: optimizing dose, spacing, targeting, and durability rather than speed alone
    Carmen Concerto, Fabrizio Bella
    Frontiers in PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  5. Robot-Assisted Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Guided by Cortical Topography
    J. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Tian +3
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurologymedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026differential,
  title = {{Differential mechanisms of continuous theta burst stimulation and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic tinnitus: preliminary efficacy dissociation by local focalization vs. network dispersion}},
  author = {Mengxue Zhang and Li Qin and Enli Jin and Chaoqi Shi and Jiayu Ni and Jiaying Wang and Siqi Gao and Yiqi Ma and Xiao Li and Yuan Li},
  journal = {Frontiers in neurology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3389/fneur.2026.1921227},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661314},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Differential mechanisms of continuous theta burst stimulation and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic tinnitus: preliminary efficacy dissociation by local focalization vs. network dispersion
AU  - Mengxue Zhang
AU  - Li Qin
AU  - Enli Jin
AU  - Chaoqi Shi
AU  - Jiayu Ni
AU  - Jiaying Wang
AU  - Siqi Gao
AU  - Yiqi Ma
AU  - Xiao Li
AU  - Yuan Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Frontiers in neurology
DO  - 10.3389/fneur.2026.1921227
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661314
AB  - Objective: This study aimed to preliminarily compare clinical efficacy and neural mechanisms of continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the auditory cortex in chronic subjective tinnitus. Differential effects on tinnitus loudness and distress, as well as the moderating role of disease duration, were explored.  Methods: Twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to cTBS ( n = 16) or rTMS ( n = 13) groups. Neuronavigation-guided stimulation was applied to the individualized auditory cortex peak activation site. Outcome measures included the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, post-treatment, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups. Resting-state fMRI was used to analyze amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo). Functional connectivity (FC) analysis was performed to explore the network-level changes.  Results: Clinically, cTBS was associated with a rapid reduction in VAS-rated tinnitus loudness ( p = 0.004), while low-frequency rTMS demonstrated sustained improvements in THI scores up to the 3-month follow-up ( p = 0.007). Mixed-model ANCOVA yielded significant time-by-group interactions for THI and VAS, verifying different therapeutic profiles between cTBS and rTMS. Resting-state fMRI uncovered separable brain plasticity: cTBS induced focal changes in left auditory cortex, whereas rTMS remodeled extensive limbic-cognitive networks. Two-way ANCOVA confirmed shared left prefrontal interaction signals, supporting stronger prefrontal suppression by cTBS. Baseline tinnitus duration was negatively correlated with 3-month THI improvement rates. Collectively, clinical and dual resting-state imaging results identified separable therapeutic and neuromodulatory signatures of cTBS and low-frequency rTMS.  Conclusion: Our exploratory results suggest that cTBS may facilitate a rapid reduction in tinnitus loudness possibly through focal auditory modulation, while low-frequency rTMS eases persistent tinnitus distress through large-scale network remodeling. Our findings provide preliminary evidence for the divergent prefrontal inhibitory profiles of the two inhibitory protocols. Shorter tinnitus duration predicts better therapeutic outcomes, highlighting the value of early intervention. These exploratory results provide evidence for personalized TMS-based neuromodulation in chronic tinnitus.
SN  - 1664-2295
ER  -