Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Botanical polysaccharides as veterinary vaccine adjuvants: structure, receptors, and translational limits

  1. 1College of Animal Science, Xichang University, Xichang, China

Abstract

Intensive livestock production depends critically on vaccination, yet the licensed veterinary adjuvant repertoire remains narrow, being dominated by aluminium salts and mineral-oil emulsions that offer limited control over response quality and cause injection-site reactions and carcass losses. Polysaccharides from Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), here referred to as TCM polysaccharides (TCMPs), have attracted attention as candidate adjuvants owing to their structural diversity, low toxicity, and mimicry of pathogen-associated molecular patterns. This review surveys immunomodulatory TCMPs by botanical origin and medicinal part, then reinterprets them structurally: adjuvanticity tracks glycosidic backbone type, molecular weight, branching, and substitution rather than taxonomic provenance. Mechanistically, adjuvant activity engages a multi-tiered cascade — pattern-recognition receptor activation (TLR2/TLR4, Dectin-1–Syk, NLRP3 inflammasome), dendritic-cell programming, modulation of the gut–immune axis and mucosal immunity, and engagement of T follicular helper-dependent humoral responses and, tentatively and as a hypothesis, tissue-resident memory T cells. Species-specific features are emphasised as potential, host-relevant mechanisms rather than established TCMP effects — including proposed Dectin-1-driven repolarisation of porcine alveolar macrophages, WC1+ γδ T cell activation in ruminants, and gut-associated lymphoid tissue in poultry — aspects poorly predicted by murine models. Critical appraisal nevertheless reveals substantial limitations: effects are most often reported for chemically undefined crude extracts, endotoxin contamination is rarely excluded, dose–response relationships are frequently non-monotonic, comparisons with licensed adjuvants are scarce, and batch-to-batch variability compromises reproducibility; biosafety claims rest largely on short-term observations. Translation to the field will depend on standardisation of structurally defined preparations, validated structure–activity relationships, rational particulate and mucosal delivery, DIVA compatibility, and economically viable extraction. The evidence positions TCMPs as a mechanistically attractive but analytically immature adjuvant class, whose contribution to antibiotic-free animal production will be determined less by new bioactive extracts than by analytical and regulatory rigour.

Related

  1. Comparative Veterinary Psychopharmacology in Dogs and Cats: Neurotransmitter Targets, Translational Boundaries, and Species-Specific Pharmacokinetics.
    Iljin Kim, Jang-Hyuk Yun
    Animals : an open access journal from MDPIPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
  2. Plant-Derived Saponin and Polysaccharide Vaccine Adjuvants: Structure-Activity Relationships and Immune-Enhancement Strategies.
    Yuxin Lao, Zhengxiang Wang, Ying Tian +2
    VaccinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textImmunologyEurope PMC
  3. Colonisation history of a vector species of veterinary interest: phylogeography of Culicoides imicola (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in the Indian Ocean revealing low genetic structure
    Lorn Ribon-Chaudat, Karine Huber, David Bru +10
    ParasitePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyHAL
  4. Sanghuang polysaccharides as emerging immunomodulators: linking molecular structure, immune recognition and the gut microbiota–immune axis
    Xiaoying Ma, Xun Chen, Guoli Liu +3
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0ImmunologyFrontiersCrossref
  5. Downstream mRNA Secondary Structure, Not Codon Elongation Supply, Coordinates Co-Translational Protein Folding Across the Human Ribosomal Exit Tunnel
    M. Saad Ul Hassan, I. Jabeen, Y. S. Kiani
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{guan2026botanical,
  title = {{Botanical polysaccharides as veterinary vaccine adjuvants: structure, receptors, and translational limits}},
  author = {Ran Guan and Chaoyun Yang},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1982641},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1982641},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Botanical polysaccharides as veterinary vaccine adjuvants: structure, receptors, and translational limits
AU  - Ran Guan
AU  - Chaoyun Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1982641
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1982641
AB  - Intensive livestock production depends critically on vaccination, yet the licensed veterinary adjuvant repertoire remains narrow, being dominated by aluminium salts and mineral-oil emulsions that offer limited control over response quality and cause injection-site reactions and carcass losses. Polysaccharides from Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), here referred to as TCM polysaccharides (TCMPs), have attracted attention as candidate adjuvants owing to their structural diversity, low toxicity, and mimicry of pathogen-associated molecular patterns. This review surveys immunomodulatory TCMPs by botanical origin and medicinal part, then reinterprets them structurally: adjuvanticity tracks glycosidic backbone type, molecular weight, branching, and substitution rather than taxonomic provenance. Mechanistically, adjuvant activity engages a multi-tiered cascade — pattern-recognition receptor activation (TLR2/TLR4, Dectin-1–Syk, NLRP3 inflammasome), dendritic-cell programming, modulation of the gut–immune axis and mucosal immunity, and engagement of T follicular helper-dependent humoral responses and, tentatively and as a hypothesis, tissue-resident memory T cells. Species-specific features are emphasised as potential, host-relevant mechanisms rather than established TCMP effects — including proposed Dectin-1-driven repolarisation of porcine alveolar macrophages, WC1+ γδ T cell activation in ruminants, and gut-associated lymphoid tissue in poultry — aspects poorly predicted by murine models. Critical appraisal nevertheless reveals substantial limitations: effects are most often reported for chemically undefined crude extracts, endotoxin contamination is rarely excluded, dose–response relationships are frequently non-monotonic, comparisons with licensed adjuvants are scarce, and batch-to-batch variability compromises reproducibility; biosafety claims rest largely on short-term observations. Translation to the field will depend on standardisation of structurally defined preparations, validated structure–activity relationships, rational particulate and mucosal delivery, DIVA compatibility, and economically viable extraction. The evidence positions TCMPs as a mechanistically attractive but analytically immature adjuvant class, whose contribution to antibiotic-free animal production will be determined less by new bioactive extracts than by analytical and regulatory rigour.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -