Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Oncology

Digital health interventions for cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis of subjective and objective cognitive outcomes

  1. 1School of Nursing, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
  2. 2Department of Hospital Infection Management, Hunan Cancer Hospital

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically compare the effects of different digital health interventions on subjective and objective cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and to provide evidence for tailored supportive care and rehabilitation strategies.

Methods: Eight databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and SinoMed, were searched from inception to March 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating digital health interventions for cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0. Interventions were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results: Twenty-two RCTs involving 1, 494 participants were included. Network meta-analysis (NMA) showed that digital exercise intervention (DEI) (SMD = 2.53, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.48) and digital psychological and behavioral intervention (DPBI) (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.85) significantly improved subjective cognitive function compared with the control group (CON). DEI was also significantly more effective than digital multimodal intervention (DMI), DPBI, digital rehabilitation intervention (DRI), and digital cognitive training (DCT), and ranked highest (SUCRA = 100.0%). For objective cognitive function, DRI significantly improved cognitive function compared with CON (SMD = 2.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.02) and ranked highest (SUCRA = 85.5%), whereas no significant differences were observed in the remaining comparisons. The certainty of evidence was low.

Conclusion: Digital health interventions may improve cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, with DEI showing the greatest potential for subjective cognitive function and DRI for objective cognitive function. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the low certainty of evidence.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ , identifier CRD420261331780.

Related

  1. How adverse childhood experiences affect the association between chronic condition progression and subjective or objective cognitive function among rural older adults?
    Jingjing Luo, Yichi Zhang, Chengchao Zhou
    European Journal of PsychotraumatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
  2. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Plasma Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers With Objective and Subjective Cognitive Screening.
    Maryam Abdolmaleki, Leslie S Gaynor, Dandan Liu +5
    Annals of clinical and translational neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCPMC
  3. Effects of cognitive-motor dual-task walking exercise versus walking-only exercise on cognitive function and patient-centred outcomes in older adults with subjective brain fog: a randomised controlled trial.
    Emre Dansuk, Burak Menek
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPsychiatry & mental healthEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Age at Menopause and Subjective Cognitive Symptoms Predict Digital Cognitive Outcomes at the Gynecological Well-Woman Visit
    Teresa Facchetti, Jillian L. Joyce, Sandra Rizer +5
    Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychologyPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  5. Episodic memory-associated weighted atrophy network mapping in mild cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive decline: a multi-center study
    Anxing Huang, Keke Jiang, Lei Chi +10
    Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
BibTeX
@article{zeng2026digital,
  title = {{Digital health interventions for cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis of subjective and objective cognitive outcomes}},
  author = {Ruihong Zeng and Xiangyu Liu and Yujia Fan and Sijie Wu and Yaxuan Hu},
  journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1989710},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1989710/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Digital health interventions for cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis of subjective and objective cognitive outcomes
AU  - Ruihong Zeng
AU  - Xiangyu Liu
AU  - Yujia Fan
AU  - Sijie Wu
AU  - Yaxuan Hu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/29
JO  - Frontiers in Oncology
DO  - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1989710
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1989710/full
AB  - Purpose: To systematically compare the effects of different digital health interventions on subjective and objective cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and to provide evidence for tailored supportive care and rehabilitation strategies.  Methods: Eight databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and SinoMed, were searched from inception to March 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating digital health interventions for cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 16.0. Interventions were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.  Results: Twenty-two RCTs involving 1, 494 participants were included. Network meta-analysis (NMA) showed that digital exercise intervention (DEI) (SMD = 2.53, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.48) and digital psychological and behavioral intervention (DPBI) (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.85) significantly improved subjective cognitive function compared with the control group (CON). DEI was also significantly more effective than digital multimodal intervention (DMI), DPBI, digital rehabilitation intervention (DRI), and digital cognitive training (DCT), and ranked highest (SUCRA = 100.0%). For objective cognitive function, DRI significantly improved cognitive function compared with CON (SMD = 2.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.02) and ranked highest (SUCRA = 85.5%), whereas no significant differences were observed in the remaining comparisons. The certainty of evidence was low.  Conclusion: Digital health interventions may improve cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, with DEI showing the greatest potential for subjective cognitive function and DRI for objective cognitive function. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the low certainty of evidence.  Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ , identifier CRD420261331780.
SN  - 2234-943X
ER  -