Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Representability of Graphical Symplectic Matroids

Abstract

Chow associated with every finite multigraph G a symplectic matroid GraphSG on the signed edge set Esqcup E*, whose restrictions to transversals are frame matroids of signed graphs, and Sarvepalli asked which of these matroids are representable. For a connected graph containing a cycle, we show that every isotropic representation of S(G) admits an incidence-flow normal form. The remaining representation conditions are expressed through its admissible minors. Consequently, if GraphSG is F-representable, then the bridgeless part of G has a nowhere-zero (F,+)-flow. In characteristic other than two, GraphSG is representable if and only if every non-loop edge on a cycle has a parallel mate. In characteristic two, we characterize the loopless graphs without two vertex-disjoint cycles by the existence of a nowhere-zero (F,+)-flow, and we show that rigidly linked short cycles, and hence subdivisions of the prism, are obstructions. For $3$-connected simple graphs this gives a complete answer: GraphSG is F-representable if and only if F has characteristic two, G has no two vertex-disjoint cycles, and either |F|>2 or G≅ K5. In particular, the matroid of the Petersen graph is representable over no field. Finally, the admissible corank--nullity polynomial of an arbitrary symplectic matroid is intrinsic and satisfies a three-term contraction identity. For graphical symplectic matroids, this becomes a deletion-contraction recursion that closes up once marked vertices are allowed, and polynomials built from enveloping matroids agree with it exactly for sheltering envelopes.

Related

  1. V-Representability Beyond Singular Times in Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory: The Hubbard Dimer Case
    Éric Cancès, Théo Duez
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryMathematical physicsarXiv
  2. On tractability, complexity, and mixed-integer convex programming representability of distributionally favorable optimization
    Nan Jiang, Weijun Xie
    Mathematical ProgrammingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text1 citedOptimisation & controlHAL
  3. More on action representability and normalizers
    James Richard Andrew Gray
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryarXiv
  4. Derived Smooth and Banach Higher Groupoids: Representability and Descent
    Qingyun Zeng
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryGeometry & topologyarXiv
  5. Affine G-multibiquandle modules for colored links I: representability of coloring functors and color-profile polynomials
    Sang Youl Lee
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ganguly2026representability,
  title = {{Representability of Graphical Symplectic Matroids}},
  author = {Sayantan Ganguly},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.01241},
  eprint = {2611.01241},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01241},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Representability of Graphical Symplectic Matroids
AU  - Sayantan Ganguly
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.01241
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01241
AB  - Chow associated with every finite multigraph G a symplectic matroid GraphSG on the signed edge set Esqcup E^*, whose restrictions to transversals are frame matroids of signed graphs, and Sarvepalli asked which of these matroids are representable. For a connected graph containing a cycle, we show that every isotropic representation of S(G) admits an incidence-flow normal form. The remaining representation conditions are expressed through its admissible minors. Consequently, if GraphSG is F-representable, then the bridgeless part of G has a nowhere-zero (F,+)-flow. In characteristic other than two, GraphSG is representable if and only if every non-loop edge on a cycle has a parallel mate. In characteristic two, we characterize the loopless graphs without two vertex-disjoint cycles by the existence of a nowhere-zero (F,+)-flow, and we show that rigidly linked short cycles, and hence subdivisions of the prism, are obstructions. For $3$-connected simple graphs this gives a complete answer: GraphSG is F-representable if and only if F has characteristic two, G has no two vertex-disjoint cycles, and either |F|>2 or G≅ K_5. In particular, the matroid of the Petersen graph is representable over no field. Finally, the admissible corank--nullity polynomial of an arbitrary symplectic matroid is intrinsic and satisfies a three-term contraction identity. For graphical symplectic matroids, this becomes a deletion-contraction recursion that closes up once marked vertices are allowed, and polynomials built from enveloping matroids agree with it exactly for sheltering envelopes.
ER  -