Perceptions of Telemedicine Use for Specialist Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- 2SSRS, Glen Mills, Pennsylvania
- 3Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
- 4Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract
Importance: For long-term residents of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), greater use of telemedicine for specialist care may improve access to and overall quality of care. Although policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic facilitated greater use of telemedicine, such use now is rare, and it is unclear why.
Objective: To examine SNF clinical leaders’ perceptions of telemedicine use and explanations of lower use among long-term residents.
Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted online and via postal mail from February 7 to July 28, 2025, among directors of nursing of SNFs, the central decision-makers for daily clinical operations. A probability-based sample was drawn from a listing of all 14 084 SNFs in the US, stratified to ensure reach to facilities of different sizes and varying telemedicine utilization.
Main Outcomes and Measures: This study measured the perceptions of key factors associated with quality of care in SNFs. Telemedicine use for specialist care and reasons for telemedicine use and disuse were solicited from SNFs’ directors of nursing. The demographic characteristics of SNFs surveyed were weighted to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services benchmarks to reflect the profile of SNFs nationally.
Results: Among 1001 directors of nursing sent invitation letters, 379 (39%) participated in this study. Most directors of nursing whose residents used telemedicine confirmed its proposed advantages: respondents said a top reason for using telemedicine is that it helped less-mobile patients get appointments (77%; 95% CI, 71%-82%) and that it helped improve patients’ quality of care (73%; 95% CI, 67%-78%). Top reasons for not using telemedicine among less-frequent users and nonusers were: telemedicine visits were not frequently offered by specialists (73%; 95% CI, 67%-79%) and telemedicine did not offer higher quality of care over normal practices (62%; 95% CI, 56%-68%). A majority of directors of nursing who use telemedicine (60%; 95% CI, 54%-65%) also reported that telemedicine placed additional time burdens on nursing staff.
Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that frontline clinical leaders view specialist telemedicine care as a useful tool for SNFs, particularly for patients with low mobility. However, they reported that telemedicine is offered too infrequently by specialists and adds to nurses’ schedules. Policy and payment reforms should include incentives for specialists to offer telemedicine and reimbursement for nursing staff time.
Related
- Modeling the impact of healthcare personnel compensation and benefits on the spread of COVID-19 in skilled nursing facilities
- Multimorbidity and Medication Order Patterns in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Real-World Evidence Study
- Perceptions of telemedicine and teledermatology among safety net patients, health care professionals, and clinical support staff.
- Caregiver perceptions of telemedicine in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: a nationwide Spanish survey
- Telemedicine implementation in Austrian correctional facilities: a qualitative interview study with prison staff
BibTeX
@article{steelfisher2026perceptions,
title = {{Perceptions of Telemedicine Use for Specialist Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities}},
author = {Gillian K. SteelFisher and Mary G. Findling and Eran N. Ben-Porath and Andrew D. Wilcock and Ateev Mehrotra and David C. Grabowski and Michael L. Barnett},
journal = {JAMA Network Open},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.37194},
url = {https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2854763},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Perceptions of Telemedicine Use for Specialist Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities
AU - Gillian K. SteelFisher
AU - Mary G. Findling
AU - Eran N. Ben-Porath
AU - Andrew D. Wilcock
AU - Ateev Mehrotra
AU - David C. Grabowski
AU - Michael L. Barnett
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - JAMA Network Open
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.37194
UR - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2854763
AB - Importance: For long-term residents of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), greater use of telemedicine for specialist care may improve access to and overall quality of care. Although policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic facilitated greater use of telemedicine, such use now is rare, and it is unclear why. Objective: To examine SNF clinical leaders’ perceptions of telemedicine use and explanations of lower use among long-term residents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted online and via postal mail from February 7 to July 28, 2025, among directors of nursing of SNFs, the central decision-makers for daily clinical operations. A probability-based sample was drawn from a listing of all 14 084 SNFs in the US, stratified to ensure reach to facilities of different sizes and varying telemedicine utilization. Main Outcomes and Measures: This study measured the perceptions of key factors associated with quality of care in SNFs. Telemedicine use for specialist care and reasons for telemedicine use and disuse were solicited from SNFs’ directors of nursing. The demographic characteristics of SNFs surveyed were weighted to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services benchmarks to reflect the profile of SNFs nationally. Results: Among 1001 directors of nursing sent invitation letters, 379 (39%) participated in this study. Most directors of nursing whose residents used telemedicine confirmed its proposed advantages: respondents said a top reason for using telemedicine is that it helped less-mobile patients get appointments (77%; 95% CI, 71%-82%) and that it helped improve patients’ quality of care (73%; 95% CI, 67%-78%). Top reasons for not using telemedicine among less-frequent users and nonusers were: telemedicine visits were not frequently offered by specialists (73%; 95% CI, 67%-79%) and telemedicine did not offer higher quality of care over normal practices (62%; 95% CI, 56%-68%). A majority of directors of nursing who use telemedicine (60%; 95% CI, 54%-65%) also reported that telemedicine placed additional time burdens on nursing staff. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that frontline clinical leaders view specialist telemedicine care as a useful tool for SNFs, particularly for patients with low mobility. However, they reported that telemedicine is offered too infrequently by specialists and adds to nurses’ schedules. Policy and payment reforms should include incentives for specialists to offer telemedicine and reimbursement for nursing staff time.
SN - 2574-3805
ER -