Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,839 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Quantum Lower Bounds for Collision Problems

Abstract

We establish tight lower bounds on the adaptive and non-adaptive quantum query complexities of Promised k-to-one Finding on an exactly k-to-one input string x∈ℤqn, for every fixed k≥2 and every feasible alphabet size q≥ n/k. The lower bounds are Ωk(n1/2−1/(2(2k−1))) for unrestricted adaptive algorithms and Ωk(n1−1/k) for one-round non-adaptive algorithms. The former matches the adaptive quantum algorithm of Liu and Zhandry [LZ19], whereas the latter matches classical birthday sampling even when the parallel queries are arbitrarily entangled. We also establish the non-adaptive lower bound Ωk(√(n/k)) for k-to-one Testing when q≥ n, resolving an open question posed by Koiran, Landes, Portier, and Yao [KLPY10]. Our proofs generate the balanced input from a uniformly random permutation and use compressed permutation oracles to describe the information learned by the algorithm. The adaptive proof bounds the growth of partial collisions through successive queries. The one-round proof instead analyzes the state after the parallel queries directly, bounding the probability that the compressed database contains a full collision. In both proofs, a short verification step accounts for correct outputs that include unrecorded positions. For the decision problem, we also compare one-round states with independent and distinct output labels.

Related

  1. Quantum lower bounds for convex optimization and real matrix-vector query problems
    Andrew M. Childs
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Quantum Communication Lower Bounds for Search Problems via Matrix Discrepancy
    Minbo Gao, Chenghua Liu, Guangxu Yang +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Tight Time-Space Lower Bounds for Collision Finding and Element Distinctness under Label Symmetry
    Frédéric Magniez, Sebastian Zur
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Elementary proofs of quantum lower bounds for element distinctness and k-sum
    Andris Ambainis, Martins Kokainis
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Natural proofs for quantum state preparation lower bounds
    Christine Li, Natalie Parham
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{peng2026quantum,
  title = {{Quantum Lower Bounds for Collision Problems}},
  author = {Pan Peng and Jingyu Wu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.01767},
  eprint = {2611.01767},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01767},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum Lower Bounds for Collision Problems
AU  - Pan Peng
AU  - Jingyu Wu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.01767
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01767
AB  - We establish tight lower bounds on the adaptive and non-adaptive quantum query complexities of Promised k-to-one Finding on an exactly k-to-one input string x∈ℤ_q^n, for every fixed k≥2 and every feasible alphabet size q≥ n/k. The lower bounds are Ω_k(n^1/2−1/(2(2^k−1))) for unrestricted adaptive algorithms and Ω_k(n^1−1/k) for one-round non-adaptive algorithms. The former matches the adaptive quantum algorithm of Liu and Zhandry [LZ19], whereas the latter matches classical birthday sampling even when the parallel queries are arbitrarily entangled. We also establish the non-adaptive lower bound Ω_k(√(n/k)) for k-to-one Testing when q≥ n, resolving an open question posed by Koiran, Landes, Portier, and Yao [KLPY10]. Our proofs generate the balanced input from a uniformly random permutation and use compressed permutation oracles to describe the information learned by the algorithm. The adaptive proof bounds the growth of partial collisions through successive queries. The one-round proof instead analyzes the state after the parallel queries directly, bounding the probability that the compressed database contains a full collision. In both proofs, a short verification step accounts for correct outputs that include unrecorded positions. For the decision problem, we also compare one-round states with independent and distinct output labels.
ER  -