Do sung speech and background noise affect sentence repetition in dyslexia?
- 1School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6AL UK
- 2Music College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234 China
Abstract
Developmental dyslexia (DD) is typically associated with slow and laborious reading, but there is also evidence pointing to speech-in-noise perception difficulties and a deficit in rapid stimulus processing. We looked at sentence repetition in 56 adult participants, half of whom had a diagnosis of DD, using a mixed design with one between-subjects variable (group) and three within-subjects variables (presentation, noise level, and semantic content). More specifically, we investigated whether sung targets could facilitate sentence repetition in DD compared to spoken ones, drawing on the idea that singing has a slower presentation rate. Further, in light of difficulties in repeating semantically meaningless targets in DD and the mixed results regarding speech-in-noise perception in this population, we examined the effects of varying semantic content (story-like, news-like, semantically anomalous) on performance, presenting targets in quiet and in noise. Results showed a significantly poorer performance in DD in quiet relative to controls but not in noise. Semantic content came out non-significant, and sung targets did not statistically affect performance. Considering a previously documented dyslexia-amusia comorbidity, we screened all participants for amusia, and—in line with previous research—we found that approximately 29% of the DD sample met the diagnostic criteria for amusia. However, amusia did not significantly affect performance. The study suggests that sentence repetition is impaired in DD and naturalistic singing does not seem to confer an advantage. As we did not isolate presentation rate as a variable, the results cannot establish that a reduced presentation rate itself has no positive effects.
Related
- Speech Tracking in fMRI Reveals a Distinct Response to Sentence Boundaries During Comprehension
- Cross-domain spontaneous tempo differences in adults with developmental dyslexia: Evidence from speech and gait
- Facial affect and arousal as a complement to gaze measures in infant speech sound perception studies
- Hybrid spatial organization and evidence for magnitude-independent neural coding of linguistic information during sentence production
- Linking visual span and reading speed in dyslexia
BibTeX
@article{loutrari2026sung,
title = {{Do sung speech and background noise affect sentence repetition in dyslexia?}},
author = {Ariadne Loutrari and Ellie Packham and Roshni Vagadia and Cunmei Jiang and Fang Liu},
journal = {Cognitive Processing},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1007/s10339-026-01393-x},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01393-x},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Do sung speech and background noise affect sentence repetition in dyslexia?
AU - Ariadne Loutrari
AU - Ellie Packham
AU - Roshni Vagadia
AU - Cunmei Jiang
AU - Fang Liu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/18
JO - Cognitive Processing
DO - 10.1007/s10339-026-01393-x
UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-026-01393-x
AB - Developmental dyslexia (DD) is typically associated with slow and laborious reading, but there is also evidence pointing to speech-in-noise perception difficulties and a deficit in rapid stimulus processing. We looked at sentence repetition in 56 adult participants, half of whom had a diagnosis of DD, using a mixed design with one between-subjects variable (group) and three within-subjects variables (presentation, noise level, and semantic content). More specifically, we investigated whether sung targets could facilitate sentence repetition in DD compared to spoken ones, drawing on the idea that singing has a slower presentation rate. Further, in light of difficulties in repeating semantically meaningless targets in DD and the mixed results regarding speech-in-noise perception in this population, we examined the effects of varying semantic content (story-like, news-like, semantically anomalous) on performance, presenting targets in quiet and in noise. Results showed a significantly poorer performance in DD in quiet relative to controls but not in noise. Semantic content came out non-significant, and sung targets did not statistically affect performance. Considering a previously documented dyslexia-amusia comorbidity, we screened all participants for amusia, and—in line with previous research—we found that approximately 29% of the DD sample met the diagnostic criteria for amusia. However, amusia did not significantly affect performance. The study suggests that sentence repetition is impaired in DD and naturalistic singing does not seem to confer an advantage. As we did not isolate presentation rate as a variable, the results cannot establish that a reduced presentation rate itself has no positive effects.
SN - 1612-4782
SN - 1612-4790
ER -