Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0arXiv

QC-Stark: A Multi-Task Benchmark Revealing Capability Dissociations in LLMs Evaluated on Quantum Computing Tasks

Abstract

We introduce QC-Stark, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on 11 quantum computing (QC) tasks, spanning circuit construction, debugging, compilation, error correction, and simulation. Across 2,750 evaluations (10 models × 11 tasks x 5 difficulty levels x 5 seeds), we find that overall rankings mask substantial per-task variation. The Spearman correlation between overall and per-task rankings is statistically insignificant for 4 out of the 11 tasks included in this benchmark. A 2-parameter Item Response Theory (IRT) model validates measurement quality, and prompt sensitivity analysis confirms ranking robustness across prompt conditions. All tasks are auto-verifiable via execution, thus not requiring any manual evaluation. We make the code and data publicly available on Huggingface.

Related

  1. Rossi-alpha Benchmark Validation of a Static Alpha Eigenvalue Capability in OpenMC
    William Zywiec, Alessandro Ingegno, David Heinrichs +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtomic, molecular & optical physicsApplied physics & instrumentationarXiv
  2. Entanglement-Capability-Aware Finite-Bond Circuit Cutting for Distributed Quantum Computing
    Weidong Liu, Qingqing Jiang, Yufu Liu +4
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Benchmark Study for Quantum Statevector Simulators for Scientific Computing
    Timothy M. Yeo, Rodney W. Lessard
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeophysics & seismologyQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. AI's Capability in Assisting Scientific Research in Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology I: Literature Review
    Anamaria Hell, Kateryna Vovk, Veena Krishnaraj +18
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyApplied physics & instrumentationHAL
  5. AI's Capability in Assisting Scientific Research in Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology II: Project Planning and Proposal Evaluation
    Jia Liu, Veena Krishnaraj, Kateryna Vovk +18
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyApplied physics & instrumentationHAL
BibTeX
@misc{gupta2026qcstark,
  title = {{QC-Stark: A Multi-Task Benchmark Revealing Capability Dissociations in LLMs Evaluated on Quantum Computing Tasks}},
  author = {Pranav Gupta},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.35581},
  eprint = {2609.35581},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35581},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - QC-Stark: A Multi-Task Benchmark Revealing Capability Dissociations in LLMs Evaluated on Quantum Computing Tasks
AU  - Pranav Gupta
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.35581
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35581
AB  - We introduce QC-Stark, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on 11 quantum computing (QC) tasks, spanning circuit construction, debugging, compilation, error correction, and simulation. Across 2,750 evaluations (10 models × 11 tasks x 5 difficulty levels x 5 seeds), we find that overall rankings mask substantial per-task variation. The Spearman correlation between overall and per-task rankings is statistically insignificant for 4 out of the 11 tasks included in this benchmark. A 2-parameter Item Response Theory (IRT) model validates measurement quality, and prompt sensitivity analysis confirms ranking robustness across prompt conditions. All tasks are auto-verifiable via execution, thus not requiring any manual evaluation. We make the code and data publicly available on Huggingface.
ER  -