Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 45 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Communications Medicine

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing strategies for familial hypercholesterolemia cascade screening in Thailand

4 more authors

Abstract

Background:: Genetic cascade screening of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) effectively prevents cardiovascular complications, but it remains unclear how health systems should roll out genetic testing over time. We developed a policy-relevant, forward-looking framework for stepwise economic evaluation on genetic testing, using FH cascade testing in Thailand as a case study.

Methods:: We constructed a decision tree-Markov hybrid model for a cohort of 35-year-old probands with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol above 4.9 mmol/L and their first- and second-degree relatives. We performed stepwise evaluations on conventional three-gene panel testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and onward to emerging long-read sequencing (LRS), compared with standard of care from a societal perspective. Conventional economic evaluation compared panel testing and WES using currently available evidence, while early economic evaluation was applied to LRS to identify target product profiles and explore uncertainties.

Results:: The analyses show that panel- and WES-based cascade screening are cost-effective versus standard of care, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of Thai baht (THB) 81,494 (€2,146/$2,371) and THB 74,641 (€1,966/$2,172) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), respectively. Compared with panel testing, WES generates 0.055 incremental QALYs at an ICER of THB 50,703 (€1,335/$1,475)/QALY. LRS is also cost-effective versus standard of care under target costs and yields 0.04 incremental QALYs/person versus WES, but requires cost reductions of 16.33% to THB 33,468/proband and 46.05% to THB 21,580/proband to surpass WES and dominate the market, respectively.

Conclusions:: This forward-looking, stepwise evaluation demonstrates that next-generation sequencing for FH cascade testing can be economically viable in Thailand while advancing precision health under universal healthcare.

Related

  1. Effectiveness of LDL Apheresis Techniques for Reducing LDL‐C in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Naser Derakhshani, Aziz Rezapour, Seyedeh Narges Pouyan +5
    Health science reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Phenotype in a Lithuanian Familial Hypercholesterolemia Cohort with Heterogeneous Sequencing Platforms
    Kristina Zubielienė, Darius Čereskevičius, Diana Žaliaduonytė +14
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Effectiveness and safety of atorvastatin/ ezetimibe fixed-dose combination in hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Juying Qian, Xingxin Zhang, Qing Li +1
    PeerJPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Case Report: Necrotizing fasciitis caused by Vibrio vulnificus without recalled seafood or seawater exposure diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing
    Caifei Yue, Bangbo Xia
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Identification of Survival-Associated miRNA Signatures in Glioblastoma Using Next-Generation Sequencing
    Andrea Bakó, Bernadett Torner, Dóra Géczi +4
    Non-coding RNAPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationOncologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026evaluating,
  title = {{Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing strategies for familial hypercholesterolemia cascade screening in Thailand}},
  author = {Yue Zhang and Parnnaphat Luksameesate and Vorasuk Shotelersuk and Jing Lou and Sutinee Soopairin and Chanthawat Patikorn and Nattanichcha Kulthanachairojana and Pawarut Wongmanovisut and Thanapol Khuharatanachai and Hwee-Lin Wee and Weerapan Khovidhunkit and Poranee Ganokroj and Chanatjit Cheawsamoot and Dimple Butani and Yot Teerawattananon and Wenjia Chen},
  journal = {Communications Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1038/s43856-026-01953-4},
  url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-026-01953-4},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing strategies for familial hypercholesterolemia cascade screening in Thailand
AU  - Yue Zhang
AU  - Parnnaphat Luksameesate
AU  - Vorasuk Shotelersuk
AU  - Jing Lou
AU  - Sutinee Soopairin
AU  - Chanthawat Patikorn
AU  - Nattanichcha Kulthanachairojana
AU  - Pawarut Wongmanovisut
AU  - Thanapol Khuharatanachai
AU  - Hwee-Lin Wee
AU  - Weerapan Khovidhunkit
AU  - Poranee Ganokroj
AU  - Chanatjit Cheawsamoot
AU  - Dimple Butani
AU  - Yot Teerawattananon
AU  - Wenjia Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Communications Medicine
DO  - 10.1038/s43856-026-01953-4
UR  - https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-026-01953-4
AB  - Background:: Genetic cascade screening of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) effectively prevents cardiovascular complications, but it remains unclear how health systems should roll out genetic testing over time. We developed a policy-relevant, forward-looking framework for stepwise economic evaluation on genetic testing, using FH cascade testing in Thailand as a case study.  Methods:: We constructed a decision tree-Markov hybrid model for a cohort of 35-year-old probands with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol above 4.9 mmol/L and their first- and second-degree relatives. We performed stepwise evaluations on conventional three-gene panel testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and onward to emerging long-read sequencing (LRS), compared with standard of care from a societal perspective. Conventional economic evaluation compared panel testing and WES using currently available evidence, while early economic evaluation was applied to LRS to identify target product profiles and explore uncertainties.  Results:: The analyses show that panel- and WES-based cascade screening are cost-effective versus standard of care, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of Thai baht (THB) 81,494 (€2,146/$2,371) and THB 74,641 (€1,966/$2,172) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), respectively. Compared with panel testing, WES generates 0.055 incremental QALYs at an ICER of THB 50,703 (€1,335/$1,475)/QALY. LRS is also cost-effective versus standard of care under target costs and yields 0.04 incremental QALYs/person versus WES, but requires cost reductions of 16.33% to THB 33,468/proband and 46.05% to THB 21,580/proband to surpass WES and dominate the market, respectively.  Conclusions:: This forward-looking, stepwise evaluation demonstrates that next-generation sequencing for FH cascade testing can be economically viable in Thailand while advancing precision health under universal healthcare.
SN  - 2730-664X
ER  -