Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,631 studies31 sourcesUpdated 55 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open

Redefining Gynecomastia Grading Using Anthropometric Parameters and Surgical Algorithm for Gynecomastia: A Single-center Study.

  1. 1From the Chennai Plastic Surgery, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
  2. 2Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Karur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Abstract

Background

Gynecomastia is a benign enlargement of male breast tissue. Traditional classifications, such as those by Simon and Rohrich, rely mainly on clinical judgment, leading to interobserver variability and surgical planning. A need exists for a measurable, reproducible objective grading method. This study proposes a gynecomastia classification system integrating anthropometric parameters such as nipple-to-pectoralis major distance and chest circumference difference. These objective measures aim to enhance grading reliability and surgical planning.Methods

A total of 134 patients who underwent gynecomastia correction between January and December 2024 were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.2. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the area under the curve, optimal cutoff points, and sensitivity and specificity.Results

In our modification, we assess severity using 2 objective measurements: the nipple-to-pectoralis major muscle distance and the difference in chest circumference between the nipple level and the inframammary fold. Grade 1 corresponds to a distance of less than 2 cm and a circumference difference of less than 3 inches; grade 2, 2-4 cm and 3-4 inches; grade 3, 4-6 cm and 4-6 inches; and grade 4, more than 6 cm and more than 6 inches. These parameters serve as indirect yet reliable indicators of skin redundancy and breast size.Conclusions

This grading system improves diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in gynecomastia evaluation. It offers an objective, standardized framework that enhances communication and predictability of outcomes.

Related

  1. Joseph E Murray, MD: redefining surgical success through the evolution of transplantation
    Pia F. Koch, Pia F. Koch, Stefan G. Tullius
    Frontiers in TransplantationPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  2. The Impact of Incretin-Based Therapies on Anthropometric and Metabolic Parameters in Women with Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome.
    Andrijana Koceva, Andrej Janež, Mojca Jensterle
    Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMC
  3. Estimation of Maximum Tibial Length From Measured Anthropometric Parameters in a North Indian Population.
    Anju Choudhary, Apurba Patra, Pooja Garg
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Effect of a free sugar-restricted diet on anthropometric parameters, lipid profile, and glycemic control in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hajar Gholamshahi, Alireza Houshdar Tehrani, Danial Fotros +1
    BMC endocrine disordersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMC
  5. Comparative Effects of Myo-Inositol, Metformin, Berberine, and Combination Therapy on Metabolic, Anthropometric and Hormonal Parameters in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A 6-Month Observational Cohort Study
    Vesselina Yanachkova, Angel Yordanov, Antonia Yaneva +2
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ramasamy2026redefining,
  title = {{Redefining Gynecomastia Grading Using Anthropometric Parameters and Surgical Algorithm for Gynecomastia: A Single-center Study.}},
  author = {Karthik Ramasamy and Mohammed Nishar Samiulla and Sushmita Vaidyanathan and Mradul Gupta and Saranya Paulraj and Abhi Sindhuja and Preethy Narayanasamy},
  journal = {Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1097/gox.0000000000008186},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921372},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Redefining Gynecomastia Grading Using Anthropometric Parameters and Surgical Algorithm for Gynecomastia: A Single-center Study.
AU  - Karthik Ramasamy
AU  - Mohammed Nishar Samiulla
AU  - Sushmita Vaidyanathan
AU  - Mradul Gupta
AU  - Saranya Paulraj
AU  - Abhi Sindhuja
AU  - Preethy Narayanasamy
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
JO  - Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
DO  - 10.1097/gox.0000000000008186
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42921372
AB  - Background  Gynecomastia is a benign enlargement of male breast tissue. Traditional classifications, such as those by Simon and Rohrich, rely mainly on clinical judgment, leading to interobserver variability and surgical planning. A need exists for a measurable, reproducible objective grading method. This study proposes a gynecomastia classification system integrating anthropometric parameters such as nipple-to-pectoralis major distance and chest circumference difference. These objective measures aim to enhance grading reliability and surgical planning.Methods  A total of 134 patients who underwent gynecomastia correction between January and December 2024 were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.2. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined the area under the curve, optimal cutoff points, and sensitivity and specificity.Results  In our modification, we assess severity using 2 objective measurements: the nipple-to-pectoralis major muscle distance and the difference in chest circumference between the nipple level and the inframammary fold. Grade 1 corresponds to a distance of less than 2 cm and a circumference difference of less than 3 inches; grade 2, 2-4 cm and 3-4 inches; grade 3, 4-6 cm and 4-6 inches; and grade 4, more than 6 cm and more than 6 inches. These parameters serve as indirect yet reliable indicators of skin redundancy and breast size.Conclusions  This grading system improves diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility in gynecomastia evaluation. It offers an objective, standardized framework that enhances communication and predictability of outcomes.
SN  - 2169-7574
ER  -