Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Bias in Universal Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials and Its Effects on Fine-Tuning

  1. 1Department of Chemical Engineering
  2. 2Georgia Institute of Technology

Abstract

Universal machine learned interatomic potentials (uMLIPs) embody a growing area of interest due to their transferability across the periodic table, displaying an error of about 0.6 kcal/mol against the Matbench Discovery test set. However, we show that achieving more accurate predictions on out-of-domain tasks requires fine-tuning. Additionally, we investigate the existence and influence of model biases in molecular dynamics (MD) by examining two approaches for data generation: from multiple MD trajectories in parallel, which we call naive fine-tuning, and from a single MD trajectory with fine-tuning after set intervals, which we call iterative fine-tuning. Our results find that naive fine-tuning generates constrained data sets that fail to represent MD simulations, and thus downstream fine-tuned models fail during extrapolation. In contrast, iterative fine-tuning yields models that are more generalizable and accurate, producing stable dynamics. These findings indicate the role of uMLIP bias in fine-tuning, and highlight the need for multiple fine-tuning steps. Lastly, we relate unphysical behavior to principal component space, and quantify extrapolations through Q-residual analysis, which are useful as a proxy for epistemic uncertainty for larger simulations.

Related

  1. Correcting the Liquid Densities of Universal Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials Using Local-Number-Density Repulsion
    Shunsuke Mieda
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  2. Universal Interatomic Potentials as Configuration-Space Generators for One-Shot and Iterative Fine-Tuning of Ab Initio-Accurate Material-Specific Models
    Jonas Hänseroth, Aaron Flötotto, Christian Dreßler
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryCondensed matterarXiv
  3. Reference Conventions and Structure Types, Rather Than 4f Occupancy, Shape Lanthanide Errors in Universal Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials
    Jungko Moni Chakma, Md. Mynul Hasan, Mohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  4. Neural Constrained Charge Equilibration for Extracting Charge Transport Parameters from Machine Learned Interatomic Potentials
    Carson Farmer, Hector Medina
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossrefEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
  5. FACTO: fast atom-centered tensor operator for accurate and efficient foundational machine-learned interatomic potentials
    Siyuan Liu, Chang Han, Sheng Gong +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryarXiv
BibTeX
@article{wong2026bias,
  title = {{Bias in Universal Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials and Its Effects on Fine-Tuning}},
  author = {Nicolas Wong and Julia H. Yang},
  journal = {Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00425},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00425},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Bias in Universal Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials and Its Effects on Fine-Tuning
AU  - Nicolas Wong
AU  - Julia H. Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/20
JO  - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
DO  - 10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00425
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.6c00425
AB  - Universal machine learned interatomic potentials (uMLIPs) embody a growing area of interest due to their transferability across the periodic table, displaying an error of about 0.6 kcal/mol against the Matbench Discovery test set. However, we show that achieving more accurate predictions on out-of-domain tasks requires fine-tuning. Additionally, we investigate the existence and influence of model biases in molecular dynamics (MD) by examining two approaches for data generation: from multiple MD trajectories in parallel, which we call naive fine-tuning, and from a single MD trajectory with fine-tuning after set intervals, which we call iterative fine-tuning. Our results find that naive fine-tuning generates constrained data sets that fail to represent MD simulations, and thus downstream fine-tuned models fail during extrapolation. In contrast, iterative fine-tuning yields models that are more generalizable and accurate, producing stable dynamics. These findings indicate the role of uMLIP bias in fine-tuning, and highlight the need for multiple fine-tuning steps. Lastly, we relate unphysical behavior to principal component space, and quantify extrapolations through Q-residual analysis, which are useful as a proxy for epistemic uncertainty for larger simulations.
SN  - 1549-9618
SN  - 1549-9626
ER  -