Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYChemElectroChem

Electrochemical Evaluation of Chromium Mixtures With N,O‐Containing Ligands for Iron–Chromium Flow Batteries

  1. 1Research Group of Battery Materials and Technologies Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering University of Turku Turku Finland
  2. 2Department of Chemistry and Materials Science Aalto University Espoo Finland
  3. 3Department of Chemistry and NanoScience Center University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland

Abstract

In this work, a series of chromium mixtures with N,O‐containing ligands were evaluated as candidate negolytes for iron–chromium flow batteries. Six systems were investigated, including three prepared with a single ligand and three prepared with pairs of chemically distinct ligands. The structurally characterized mixture‐1 was used as the reference, whereas the exact chromium coordination structures of mixtures 2–6 were not established. UV–vis spectroscopy was used to estimate the dissolved chromium concentrations of the studied mixtures in 1 M KCl. The results show that combining chemically distinct ligands increases dissolved chromium concentration, reaching up to approximately 150 mM compared with 13.5 mM for mixture 1. Cyclic voltammetry revealed that five electrochemically evaluated mixtures displayed quasireversible redox behavior, whereas one mixture did not show any clear redox activity. However, flow‐cell cycling of these electroactive mixtures at a nominal concentration of 10 mM revealed limited capacity utilization and substantial capacity fading. These results show that increasing the dissolved chromium concentration alone does not ensure improved electrochemical accessibility or stable flow‐cell cycling. Further optimization and solution‐speciation studies are required to improve cycling stability and identify the chromium species responsible for the observed electrochemical behavior.

Related

  1. Use of a chromium(III) catalyst containing an N,N'-di-tert-butyl-2,11-diazal[3,3](2,6)pyridinophane ligand in polymerization of ethylene and propylene
    S. Plentz-Meneghetti, Pierre Lutz, Jacky Kress
    PolímerosPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersHAL
  2. Simplified theory to predict contact ion pair formation in electrolyte mixtures containing hydroxylammonium nitrate
    Benjamin Shaw
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textAnalytical chemistryElectrochemistry & energyPLOS
  3. Why Electrochemical–Thermal–Mechanical Understanding is Needed to Explain Knees in Lithium-Ion Batteries Degradation
    Matheus Leal de Souza, M. Waseem Marzook, Mohammed Asheruddin N +4
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  4. Electrochemical Properties and Changes of Crystal and Electronic Structures of Spinel-Type Mg1.33– y V1.67– x + y Mn x O4 ( x = 0.15, 0.06 ≤ y ≤ 0.13) for Magnesium Secondary Batteries
    Yasushi Idemoto, Kohei Yamanouchi, Chiaki Ishibashi +3
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossrefEurope PMC
  5. MXene Film/Foam Bilayer Anodes with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance for Self-Standing Lithium-Ion Batteries
    Tae Hyeon Park, Ki Yun Kim, Jea Uk Lee
    BatteriesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Materials & polymersCrossref
BibTeX
@article{li2026electrochemical,
  title = {{Electrochemical Evaluation of Chromium Mixtures With N,O‐Containing Ligands for Iron–Chromium Flow Batteries}},
  author = {Qiujun Li and Eduardo Martínez‐González and Mohammed Amine Hammouali and Petri Pihko and Pekka Peljo},
  journal = {ChemElectroChem},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1002/celc.70344},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.70344},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Electrochemical Evaluation of Chromium Mixtures With N,O‐Containing Ligands for Iron–Chromium Flow Batteries
AU  - Qiujun Li
AU  - Eduardo Martínez‐González
AU  - Mohammed Amine Hammouali
AU  - Petri Pihko
AU  - Pekka Peljo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/06
JO  - ChemElectroChem
DO  - 10.1002/celc.70344
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.70344
AB  - In this work, a series of chromium mixtures with N,O‐containing ligands were evaluated as candidate negolytes for iron–chromium flow batteries. Six systems were investigated, including three prepared with a single ligand and three prepared with pairs of chemically distinct ligands. The structurally characterized mixture‐1 was used as the reference, whereas the exact chromium coordination structures of mixtures 2–6 were not established. UV–vis spectroscopy was used to estimate the dissolved chromium concentrations of the studied mixtures in 1 M KCl. The results show that combining chemically distinct ligands increases dissolved chromium concentration, reaching up to approximately 150 mM compared with 13.5 mM for mixture 1. Cyclic voltammetry revealed that five electrochemically evaluated mixtures displayed quasireversible redox behavior, whereas one mixture did not show any clear redox activity. However, flow‐cell cycling of these electroactive mixtures at a nominal concentration of 10 mM revealed limited capacity utilization and substantial capacity fading. These results show that increasing the dissolved chromium concentration alone does not ensure improved electrochemical accessibility or stable flow‐cell cycling. Further optimization and solution‐speciation studies are required to improve cycling stability and identify the chromium species responsible for the observed electrochemical behavior.
SN  - 2196-0216
ER  -