NO EVIDENCE OF QTC INTERVAL PROLONGATION WITH THE MENIN INHIBITOR BLEXIMENIB WHEN GIVEN AS MONOTHERAPY OR IN COMBINATION WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA AML-DIRECTED THERAPIES FOR KMT2A OR NPM1 ALTERED AML
38 affiliations
- 1Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States
- 2Medical College Of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- 3City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States
- 4Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
- 5START Madrid-FJD Early Phase Unit, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, IIS-FJD, Madrid, Spain
- 6Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, PA, United States
- 7Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- 8Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- 9Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- 10Monash Health and School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- 11Aix-Marseille Université, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, Marseille, France
- 12Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- 13Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, CIC INSERM U1415, Tours, France
- 14MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States
- 15Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- 16Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY, United States
- 17Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- 18Janssen Research & Development, LLC High Wycombe, United Kingdom
- 19ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- 20Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Beerse, Belgium
- 21Griffith University and Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia
- 22IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio de Tuori (IRST), Italy
- 23University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and UCL/NIHR Clinical Research Facility, London, United Kingdom
- 24Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Cambridge, MA, United States
- 25Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy
- 26University Cancer Institute Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- 27Universitätsklinikum TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- 28University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, and Experimental Hematology, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
- 29Department of Internal Medicine V; Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- 30The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- 31Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- 32Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
- 33Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Raritan, NJ, United States
- 34Westmead Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- 35Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University, United Kingdom
- 36Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- 37Johnson & Johnson Mexico, Mexico
- 38Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Ghana
Abstract
Background: Corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation is a known risk for fatal cardiac arrythmias and emerged as a safety signal with currently approved menin inhibitors (all-grade: 12%–36%; high-grade: 8–17%). QTc prolongation may limit dose intensity of available menin inhibitor therapy and complicate management of AML by preventing combination with anti-leukemic therapies and use of critical supportive care medicines. Bleximenib is being evaluated in late stage clinical studies in relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutated AML. We report cardiac safety analyses from two Phase 1 trials evaluating bleximenib as monotherapy (ALE1001 [NCT04811560]) or in combination with AML-directed therapies (ALE1002 [NCT05453903]). Methods: The safety population included 141 participants (pts) in ALE1001 and 193 in ALE1002. Patients were excluded for QTcF ≥450 ms (males) or ≥470 ms (females), or a family history of long QT syndrome. Bleximenib was administered orally in 28-day cycles at doses ranging from 50–100 mg QD or 15–150 mg BID, as monotherapy or combined with venetoclax/azacitidine (VEN/AZA) or intensive chemotherapy (7+3). Cardiac monitoring included triplicate 12-lead ECGs at baseline and Day 1 of each cycle (or as clinically indicated), with central review. AEs were assessed per CTCAE v5.0. Exposure-response analysis using ΔQTcF as the dependent variable and time-matched bleximenib concentrations as the explanatory variable was performed in 139 ALE1001 patients with central ECG data, supported by intensive pharmacokinetic sampling and mean ΔQTcP. Results: Of 334 pts receiving bleximenib across both studies, only one (0.3%) high grade (Grade [Gr] 3) event of QTc prolongation was observed in a pt receiving bleximenib 100mg QD as monotherapy with baseline comorbidities of ongoing cardiomyopathy and hypokalemia. At the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in ALE1001, a single (1.6%) Gr 1 QTcF prolongation treatment emergent AE (TEAE) occurred that resolved without dose reduction or interruption. In ALE1002, minimal QTcF prolongation TEAEs were reported in pts receiving bleximenib 15–150mg BID in combination with VEN, VEN+AZA, or ‘7+3’.; 8 (4.1%) experienced a QTcF prolongation event. All were low-grade (7 Gr1, 1 Gr2) non serious and did not result in bleximenib dose modifications. No dose dependent trend in QTcF interval increases were apparent across analyses in either study. In ALE1001 central ECG data (n=139), time course of mean change in heart rate (HR) was comparable across different doses. No increase of >10 bpm was observed, with no QTc prolongation seen up to the highest dose explored (2-fold higher exposure vs RP2D). Observations from ALE1002 were similar with no dose-dependent effects on QTc prolongation. ALE1001 exposure-response analysis based on time-matched central ECG data indicated no clinically relevant effect of bleximenib on cardiac repolarization following bleximenib monotherapy at all doses explored. Bleximenib had no clinically significant impact on HR. Conclusions: Administration of bleximenib as monotherapy or in combination with AML-directed therapies did not prolong QTc interval and no cardiac safety signal was identified.
Related
- Comparative effectiveness of first-/second-generation EGFR-TKI combination therapy versus third-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy in untreated locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a real-world, retrospective study in China
- Phase 1 study of OX40 agonist ABBV-368 as monotherapy or in combination with budigalimab in advanced solid tumors
- BLEXIMENIB IN COMBINATION WITH INTENSIVE CHEMOTHERAPY: A PHASE 1B STUDY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA WITH KMT2A OR NPM1 ALTERATIONS
- RP2D DETERMINATION OF BLEXIMENIB IN COMBINATION WITH VEN+AZA: PHASE 1B STUDY IN ND & R/R AML WITH KMT2A TYPE: ORAL PRESENTATION ANDREW H. WEI KMT2A/NPM1 NPM1ALTERATIONS
- Comprehensive regulatory and developmental landscape of cell–scaffold combination therapies for osteoarthritis
BibTeX
@article{abdulhay2026evidence,
title = {{NO EVIDENCE OF QTC INTERVAL PROLONGATION WITH THE MENIN INHIBITOR BLEXIMENIB WHEN GIVEN AS MONOTHERAPY OR IN COMBINATION WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA AML-DIRECTED THERAPIES FOR KMT2A OR NPM1 ALTERED AML}},
author = {Maher ABDUL-HAY and Sameem ABEDIN and Ibrahim ALDOSS and Ana PIÉROLA and Juan M ALONSO-DOMÍNGUEZ and Nikki DASKALAKIS and Hartmut DÖHNER and Amber D'SOUZA and Neil DUNAVIN and Jordi ESTEVE and Amir T FATHI and Pasquale L FEDELE and Sylvain GARCIAZ and Lucille FERRANTE and Ana GARRIDO DIAZ and Emmanuel GYAN and Nahor HADDISH-BERHANE and Elias J JABBOUR and Madlen JENTZSCH and Marina KONOPLEVA and Jan KRöNKE and Oliver LOMAS and Anita J KUMAR and Dandan LUO and Christina LOEFGREN and Valentina MANCINI and Anna MITSELOS and Daniel MORILLO and Teng F NG and Marianna NORATA and Jenny O'NIONS and Kathryn PACKMAN and Cristina PAPAYANNIDIS and Christian RECHER and Ulrike PHILIPPAR and Giorgos PSARROS and Christoph RöLLIG and Olga SALAMERO and Tim SAUER and Emma SEARLE and Prathap N SHASTRI and Richard STONE and Peter TAN and Tao SUN and Lachlin VAUGHAN and Gala VEGA and Paresh VYAS and Andrew H WEI and Monserrat ROJAS and Marie Luise HüTTER-KRÖNKE},
journal = {Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.htct.2026.107906},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2026.107906},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - NO EVIDENCE OF QTC INTERVAL PROLONGATION WITH THE MENIN INHIBITOR BLEXIMENIB WHEN GIVEN AS MONOTHERAPY OR IN COMBINATION WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA AML-DIRECTED THERAPIES FOR KMT2A OR NPM1 ALTERED AML
AU - Maher ABDUL-HAY
AU - Sameem ABEDIN
AU - Ibrahim ALDOSS
AU - Ana PIÉROLA
AU - Juan M ALONSO-DOMÍNGUEZ
AU - Nikki DASKALAKIS
AU - Hartmut DÖHNER
AU - Amber D'SOUZA
AU - Neil DUNAVIN
AU - Jordi ESTEVE
AU - Amir T FATHI
AU - Pasquale L FEDELE
AU - Sylvain GARCIAZ
AU - Lucille FERRANTE
AU - Ana GARRIDO DIAZ
AU - Emmanuel GYAN
AU - Nahor HADDISH-BERHANE
AU - Elias J JABBOUR
AU - Madlen JENTZSCH
AU - Marina KONOPLEVA
AU - Jan KRöNKE
AU - Oliver LOMAS
AU - Anita J KUMAR
AU - Dandan LUO
AU - Christina LOEFGREN
AU - Valentina MANCINI
AU - Anna MITSELOS
AU - Daniel MORILLO
AU - Teng F NG
AU - Marianna NORATA
AU - Jenny O'NIONS
AU - Kathryn PACKMAN
AU - Cristina PAPAYANNIDIS
AU - Christian RECHER
AU - Ulrike PHILIPPAR
AU - Giorgos PSARROS
AU - Christoph RöLLIG
AU - Olga SALAMERO
AU - Tim SAUER
AU - Emma SEARLE
AU - Prathap N SHASTRI
AU - Richard STONE
AU - Peter TAN
AU - Tao SUN
AU - Lachlin VAUGHAN
AU - Gala VEGA
AU - Paresh VYAS
AU - Andrew H WEI
AU - Monserrat ROJAS
AU - Marie Luise HüTTER-KRÖNKE
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
DO - 10.1016/j.htct.2026.107906
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2026.107906
AB - Background: Corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation is a known risk for fatal cardiac arrythmias and emerged as a safety signal with currently approved menin inhibitors (all-grade: 12%–36%; high-grade: 8–17%). QTc prolongation may limit dose intensity of available menin inhibitor therapy and complicate management of AML by preventing combination with anti-leukemic therapies and use of critical supportive care medicines. Bleximenib is being evaluated in late stage clinical studies in relapsed/refractory or newly diagnosed KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutated AML. We report cardiac safety analyses from two Phase 1 trials evaluating bleximenib as monotherapy (ALE1001 [NCT04811560]) or in combination with AML-directed therapies (ALE1002 [NCT05453903]). Methods: The safety population included 141 participants (pts) in ALE1001 and 193 in ALE1002. Patients were excluded for QTcF ≥450 ms (males) or ≥470 ms (females), or a family history of long QT syndrome. Bleximenib was administered orally in 28-day cycles at doses ranging from 50–100 mg QD or 15–150 mg BID, as monotherapy or combined with venetoclax/azacitidine (VEN/AZA) or intensive chemotherapy (7+3). Cardiac monitoring included triplicate 12-lead ECGs at baseline and Day 1 of each cycle (or as clinically indicated), with central review. AEs were assessed per CTCAE v5.0. Exposure-response analysis using ΔQTcF as the dependent variable and time-matched bleximenib concentrations as the explanatory variable was performed in 139 ALE1001 patients with central ECG data, supported by intensive pharmacokinetic sampling and mean ΔQTcP. Results: Of 334 pts receiving bleximenib across both studies, only one (0.3%) high grade (Grade [Gr] 3) event of QTc prolongation was observed in a pt receiving bleximenib 100mg QD as monotherapy with baseline comorbidities of ongoing cardiomyopathy and hypokalemia. At the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in ALE1001, a single (1.6%) Gr 1 QTcF prolongation treatment emergent AE (TEAE) occurred that resolved without dose reduction or interruption. In ALE1002, minimal QTcF prolongation TEAEs were reported in pts receiving bleximenib 15–150mg BID in combination with VEN, VEN+AZA, or ‘7+3’.; 8 (4.1%) experienced a QTcF prolongation event. All were low-grade (7 Gr1, 1 Gr2) non serious and did not result in bleximenib dose modifications. No dose dependent trend in QTcF interval increases were apparent across analyses in either study. In ALE1001 central ECG data (n=139), time course of mean change in heart rate (HR) was comparable across different doses. No increase of >10 bpm was observed, with no QTc prolongation seen up to the highest dose explored (2-fold higher exposure vs RP2D). Observations from ALE1002 were similar with no dose-dependent effects on QTc prolongation. ALE1001 exposure-response analysis based on time-matched central ECG data indicated no clinically relevant effect of bleximenib on cardiac repolarization following bleximenib monotherapy at all doses explored. Bleximenib had no clinically significant impact on HR. Conclusions: Administration of bleximenib as monotherapy or in combination with AML-directed therapies did not prolong QTc interval and no cardiac safety signal was identified.
SN - 2531-1379
SN - 2531-1387
ER -