Knowledge, Confidence and Preparedness for Brain Death Determination Among Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Residents: A National Web-Based Survey with an Embedded Randomised Vignette.
- 1Department of Intensive Care, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 21070 Diyarbakır, Turkey.
- 2Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 21070 Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Abstract
Background/objectives
Under Turkish law, brain death is determined by two physicians, one of whom is a specialist in anaesthesiology and reanimation or intensive care, a responsibility residents assume soon after qualifying. We assessed whether residents' confidence matches their accuracy, and whether the decision to initiate determination is influenced by the family's attitude toward organ donation.Methods
Cross-sectional web-based survey of a national convenience sample of anaesthesiology and reanimation residents in Türkiye. Ten knowledge statements and three clinical vignettes combined the answer and the respondent's confidence in one choice; the primary outcome was the high-confidence error rate. In an embedded participant-blinded randomised vignette, participants were allocated 1:1 to a medically identical scenario describing the family as favourable or opposed to donation.Results
A total of 206 residents were analysed. They answered 80.9% of items correctly but endorsed only 64.2% with confidence; confident answers were correct in 90.8% of instances versus 63.3% of non-confident answers (p < 0.001). The mean high-confidence error rate was 5.9 ± 7.3%, yet 50.5% committed at least one such error, and these errors clustered in four domains. In this exploratory comparison, initiation of determination did not differ between arms (85.6% versus 87.4%; adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI 0.54-3.05). Only 18.0% felt prepared to serve on a determination board; in univariable and sensitivity analyses, preparedness was associated with case exposure and formal instruction but not with knowledge score.Conclusions
Residents answered most items correctly and were appropriately cautious, yet fewer than one in five felt prepared; self-reported preparedness is not a measure of clinical competence. Supervised clinical exposure, correction of specific misconceptions and communication training are priorities for future intervention studies.
Related
- Medico-legal Knowledge and Awareness Among Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Physicians in Türkiye: A Nationwide Survey.
- Healthcare providers’ confidence, satisfaction, and perceived preparedness following a multicomponent simulation-based cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program in Gaza
- Research Preparedness Among Osteopathic Medical Students in the Post-Pass/Fail Licensing Examination Era: Bridging the Gap Between Rising Expectations and Student Confidence
- Enhancing student confidence and preparedness in pharmacology: a virtual pre-laboratory approach
- Evaluating the impact of a gambling harm focused educational intervention on medical students' self-reported confidence: a non-randomised, single-group pre-post study
BibTeX
@article{yanatma2026knowledge,
title = {{Knowledge, Confidence and Preparedness for Brain Death Determination Among Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Residents: A National Web-Based Survey with an Embedded Randomised Vignette.}},
author = {Seher Yanatma and Sedat Kaya},
journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/healthcare14203495},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42940540},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Knowledge, Confidence and Preparedness for Brain Death Determination Among Anaesthesiology and Reanimation Residents: A National Web-Based Survey with an Embedded Randomised Vignette.
AU - Seher Yanatma
AU - Sedat Kaya
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/17
JO - Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/healthcare14203495
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42940540
AB - Background/objectives Under Turkish law, brain death is determined by two physicians, one of whom is a specialist in anaesthesiology and reanimation or intensive care, a responsibility residents assume soon after qualifying. We assessed whether residents' confidence matches their accuracy, and whether the decision to initiate determination is influenced by the family's attitude toward organ donation.Methods Cross-sectional web-based survey of a national convenience sample of anaesthesiology and reanimation residents in Türkiye. Ten knowledge statements and three clinical vignettes combined the answer and the respondent's confidence in one choice; the primary outcome was the high-confidence error rate. In an embedded participant-blinded randomised vignette, participants were allocated 1:1 to a medically identical scenario describing the family as favourable or opposed to donation.Results A total of 206 residents were analysed. They answered 80.9% of items correctly but endorsed only 64.2% with confidence; confident answers were correct in 90.8% of instances versus 63.3% of non-confident answers (p < 0.001). The mean high-confidence error rate was 5.9 ± 7.3%, yet 50.5% committed at least one such error, and these errors clustered in four domains. In this exploratory comparison, initiation of determination did not differ between arms (85.6% versus 87.4%; adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI 0.54-3.05). Only 18.0% felt prepared to serve on a determination board; in univariable and sensitivity analyses, preparedness was associated with case exposure and formal instruction but not with knowledge score.Conclusions Residents answered most items correctly and were appropriately cautious, yet fewer than one in five felt prepared; self-reported preparedness is not a measure of clinical competence. Supervised clinical exposure, correction of specific misconceptions and communication training are priorities for future intervention studies.
SN - 2227-9032
ER -