Do good neighbours compensate for bad climate? The case of sessile oak Quercus petraea in phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods
Abstract
Stressful climates threaten the performance of individuals and the survival of species, but individual performance also depends on biotic interactions with neighbours, so that ‘good' neighbours might in theory compensate for ‘bad' climates. However, what makes a good neighbour, and why, has been little studied. We hypothesize that phylogenetically proximate neighbours either interact positively (by sharing mutualists), thereby helping to resist climate stress, or they interact negatively (by sharing enemies or competing), thereby reducing resistance. We studied seed germination, juvenile growth, and adult phenology of sessile oaks Quercus petraea and how they respond to microclimatic stress in phylogenetically proximate and distant neighbourhoods, manipulating offspring-density, the presence of insects and fungi, and spatial proximity to oaks. We found that juvenile oaks were more resistant to drought stress when growing in phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods. Also, the budburst delay in adults in phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods disappeared under drought. In contrast, under drought, seeds germinated better in the presence of conspecific adults. Most importantly, under humid or cold conditions, phylogenetically proximate neighbours were more favourable in multiple ways. Differences in resistance to microclimate-stress among phylogenetically proximate and distant neighbourhoods reflect the activity of fungi, insects, or the interaction with conspecific adult neighbours, i.e. differences disappear once the pertinent factor is experimentally excluded. These interactive effects were mostly stronger than the main effects of microclimatic variables and phylogenetic distance. Effects of phylogenetic distance were partly replaceable by the percentage of gymnosperms. We suggest that under the increased temperature and decreased precipitation due to climate change, oak regeneration may profit from a phylogenetically distant neighbourhood, partly in the presence of a spatially proximate conspecific. At the same time, such warmer and drier conditions eliminate the advantages that oaks have from a phylogenetically proximate neighbourhood, potentially contributing to an erosion of phylogenetic niche conservatism under climate change.
Related
- Single Cell Proteomics reveals partial uncoupling of the Glycerol-3-Phosphate shuttle to compensate for Electron Transport Chain dysfunction in Alexander Disease GFAP mutations
- Animals or plants? Evolutionary branching of sessile versus mobile cognitive agents in noisy environments
- Who are my Neighbours? Selection Targets Robustness to Full Replication Events, Not to Individual Mutations
- A new Serratia taxon found in a trombidiform mite shows genomic evidence of host adaptation but is phylogenetically distinct from Serratia symbiotica
- Self-amplifying RNA vaccines encoding chimeric and mosaic hemagglutinins confer immunity against phylogenetically diverse influenza A viruses
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026good,
title = {{Do good neighbours compensate for bad climate? The case of sessile oak Quercus petraea in phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods}},
author = {Keliang Zhang and Vincent Jung and Maud Deniau and Benjamin Yguel and Benoît Béchade and Soumen Mallick and Miguel Verdú and Andreas Prinzing},
journal = {Oikos},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1002/oik.12734},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05776091v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Do good neighbours compensate for bad climate? The case of sessile oak Quercus petraea in phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods
AU - Keliang Zhang
AU - Vincent Jung
AU - Maud Deniau
AU - Benjamin Yguel
AU - Benoît Béchade
AU - Soumen Mallick
AU - Miguel Verdú
AU - Andreas Prinzing
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/02
JO - Oikos
DO - 10.1002/oik.12734
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05776091v1
AB - Stressful climates threaten the performance of individuals and the survival of species, but individual performance also depends on biotic interactions with neighbours, so that ‘good' neighbours might in theory compensate for ‘bad' climates. However, what makes a good neighbour, and why, has been little studied. We hypothesize that phylogenetically proximate neighbours either interact positively (by sharing mutualists), thereby helping to resist climate stress, or they interact negatively (by sharing enemies or competing), thereby reducing resistance. We studied seed germination, juvenile growth, and adult phenology of sessile oaks Quercus petraea and how they respond to microclimatic stress in phylogenetically proximate and distant neighbourhoods, manipulating offspring-density, the presence of insects and fungi, and spatial proximity to oaks. We found that juvenile oaks were more resistant to drought stress when growing in phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods. Also, the budburst delay in adults in phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods disappeared under drought. In contrast, under drought, seeds germinated better in the presence of conspecific adults. Most importantly, under humid or cold conditions, phylogenetically proximate neighbours were more favourable in multiple ways. Differences in resistance to microclimate-stress among phylogenetically proximate and distant neighbourhoods reflect the activity of fungi, insects, or the interaction with conspecific adult neighbours, i.e. differences disappear once the pertinent factor is experimentally excluded. These interactive effects were mostly stronger than the main effects of microclimatic variables and phylogenetic distance. Effects of phylogenetic distance were partly replaceable by the percentage of gymnosperms. We suggest that under the increased temperature and decreased precipitation due to climate change, oak regeneration may profit from a phylogenetically distant neighbourhood, partly in the presence of a spatially proximate conspecific. At the same time, such warmer and drier conditions eliminate the advantages that oaks have from a phylogenetically proximate neighbourhood, potentially contributing to an erosion of phylogenetic niche conservatism under climate change.
SN - 0030-1299
SN - 1600-0706
ER -