Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Time to sustained control of the effective reproduction number as a failure-time estimand: a county-level analysis of the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in the United States.

  1. 1Department of Preventive Medicine, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Abstract

Subnational analyses of emerging pathogen transmission typically model the reproduction number (Rt) as a continuous outcome and estimate average associations with its level. Operationally, however, response planning depends on a different quantity: which jurisdictions bring transmission below the epidemic threshold (Rt<1), and how quickly. We formulate time to control as a failure-time estimand and show that doing so exposes a structural feature that linear regression does not accommodate: a jurisdiction cannot enter the risk set until enough cases accumulate to estimate Rt. Cases accumulate faster where transmission is faster, so entry time depends on the outcome process itself and on factors that drive early spread. We account for this outcome-dependent observability using a mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards model with calendar-time left truncation and state-level Gaussian frailties, applied to 2,956 US counties observed between January 22 and July 15, 2020. The primary event was defined as the first three-day sustained reduction of mean Rt below one. Control was rare (171 counties, 5.8%). Each standard-deviation increase in log population density was associated with a lower rate of control (hazard ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.44 - 0.67) and higher policy stringency with a faster rate (HR 1.50; CI 1.09 - 2.05). Evaluating jurisdictions by their rate of reaching an operational target - rather than by average transmission level - provides a clearer, decision-relevant metric for prospective allocation decisions and public health interventions. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, reproduction number, survival analysis, Cox model, county-level, United States, policy stringency, population density.

Related

  1. Estimating the effective reproduction number of HIV infections in Japan from 1985 to 2025: a Bayesian extended back calculation
    Seiko Fujiwara, Hiroshi Nishiura
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossref
  2. Deucravacitinib in concomitant psoriasis vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid: A case of sustained dual disease control
    Rachel Daher, Alessandro Magnatta, Walter Volpi +7
    JAAD case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. From Genes to Gonads: Molecular Control Points of Reproduction in the Sea Urchin as a Framework for Aquaculture
    Alfonso Rodríguez, Jorge Olmos
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PhysiologyCrossref
  4. Failure to distinguish “mental health” from “mental illness” disrupts effective policy for population well-being
    Kai Ruggeri, Hannes Jarke, Sofia Pelica
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  5. Beyond delay: Discounting rewards for sustained self-control
    Justin Wahlers, Jonathan Westlake, Oh-Ryeong Ha +3
    PsyArXivPreprintCC0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
BibTeX
@misc{kakasis2026time,
  title = {{Time to sustained control of the effective reproduction number as a failure-time estimand: a county-level analysis of the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in the United States.}},
  author = {A. Kakasis and M. Panagiotidou and N. Demiris and E. Samoli and V. Sypsa},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.11.05.26367273},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.05.26367273v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Time to sustained control of the effective reproduction number as a failure-time estimand: a county-level analysis of the first SARS-CoV-2 wave in the United States.
AU  - A. Kakasis
AU  - M. Panagiotidou
AU  - N. Demiris
AU  - E. Samoli
AU  - V. Sypsa
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.11.05.26367273
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.05.26367273v1
AB  - Subnational analyses of emerging pathogen transmission typically model the reproduction number (Rt) as a continuous outcome and estimate average associations with its level. Operationally, however, response planning depends on a different quantity: which jurisdictions bring transmission below the epidemic threshold (Rt<1), and how quickly. We formulate time to control as a failure-time estimand and show that doing so exposes a structural feature that linear regression does not accommodate: a jurisdiction cannot enter the risk set until enough cases accumulate to estimate Rt. Cases accumulate faster where transmission is faster, so entry time depends on the outcome process itself and on factors that drive early spread. We account for this outcome-dependent observability using a mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards model with calendar-time left truncation and state-level Gaussian frailties, applied to 2,956 US counties observed between January 22 and July 15, 2020. The primary event was defined as the first three-day sustained reduction of mean Rt below one. Control was rare (171 counties, 5.8%). Each standard-deviation increase in log population density was associated with a lower rate of control (hazard ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.44 - 0.67) and higher policy stringency with a faster rate (HR 1.50; CI 1.09 - 2.05). Evaluating jurisdictions by their rate of reaching an operational target - rather than by average transmission level - provides a clearer, decision-relevant metric for prospective allocation decisions and public health interventions. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, reproduction number, survival analysis, Cox model, county-level, United States, policy stringency, population density.
ER  -