GOWC: an open tool for observing-conditions prediction and observation planning, tested against site monitors and an exposure-time calculator
Abstract
GOWC (Global Observing-conditions Weather Catalogue) is an open web application that takes the user from a target to an exposure plan across 2,642 catalogued observatory sites. It computes seeing, airmass, extinction, precipitable water vapour, sky brightness and signal-to-noise from live Open-Meteo meteorology, including pressure-level profiles, and tests most of these outputs against an independent reference. The photometric SNR calculator, run with GOWC's own catalogue entries, reproduces the ING SIGNAL exposure-time calculator to a median 1.9 per cent over a 16-point magnitude-airmass grid on two instruments. Precipitable water vapour tracks the Paranal LHATPRO radiometer closely (ρ=+0.95, 606 nights) with a +43 per cent wet bias. Seeing is computed from the Tatarski Cn2 chain integrated over the pressure levels above the site and calibrated to the ESO MASS free-atmosphere median at Paranal; matching it requires an effective Tatarski coefficient of 5.7, nearly twice the upper end of the published range, which quantifies how much turbulence four coarse pressure levels fail to resolve. Against ~20 months of ESO DIMM data the seeing forecast has a weak but significant night-to-night ranking skill (ρ=+0.24, 575 nights, at Paranal; +0.16 at La Silla). Surface wind alone does as well or better (+0.27, +0.41) and persistence does better (+0.42, +0.47), but the free-atmosphere term tracks MASS (ρ=+0.35) and carries information that surface wind does not (partial ρ=+0.28, +0.40). At held-out sites the absolute seeing scale is no better than a constant. GOWC therefore treats forecast seeing as indicative, shows measured values wherever a public site monitor exists, and states which outputs are measured, calibrated or unvalidated.
Related
- pyEDITH: the coronagraphic exposure time calculator for the Habitable Worlds Observatory
- Observing Cosmic Reheating with the expanded Simons Observatory
- Constraints on ultralight bosons from merging binary and remnant black holes observed during the second and third parts of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run
- Observing the Earth's Plasmasphere and Ionosphere From the Lunar Surface
- Normalizing Flow Emulator for Gravitational Wave Detection Probability in the LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA O4 Observing Run
BibTeX
@misc{ahmed2026gowc,
title = {{GOWC: an open tool for observing-conditions prediction and observation planning, tested against site monitors and an exposure-time calculator}},
author = {Ahzam Ahmed},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.34940},
eprint = {2610.34940},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34940},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - GOWC: an open tool for observing-conditions prediction and observation planning, tested against site monitors and an exposure-time calculator
AU - Ahzam Ahmed
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/26
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.34940
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34940
AB - GOWC (Global Observing-conditions Weather Catalogue) is an open web application that takes the user from a target to an exposure plan across 2,642 catalogued observatory sites. It computes seeing, airmass, extinction, precipitable water vapour, sky brightness and signal-to-noise from live Open-Meteo meteorology, including pressure-level profiles, and tests most of these outputs against an independent reference. The photometric SNR calculator, run with GOWC's own catalogue entries, reproduces the ING SIGNAL exposure-time calculator to a median 1.9 per cent over a 16-point magnitude-airmass grid on two instruments. Precipitable water vapour tracks the Paranal LHATPRO radiometer closely (ρ=+0.95, 606 nights) with a +43 per cent wet bias. Seeing is computed from the Tatarski C_n^2 chain integrated over the pressure levels above the site and calibrated to the ESO MASS free-atmosphere median at Paranal; matching it requires an effective Tatarski coefficient of 5.7, nearly twice the upper end of the published range, which quantifies how much turbulence four coarse pressure levels fail to resolve. Against ~20 months of ESO DIMM data the seeing forecast has a weak but significant night-to-night ranking skill (ρ=+0.24, 575 nights, at Paranal; +0.16 at La Silla). Surface wind alone does as well or better (+0.27, +0.41) and persistence does better (+0.42, +0.47), but the free-atmosphere term tracks MASS (ρ=+0.35) and carries information that surface wind does not (partial ρ=+0.28, +0.40). At held-out sites the absolute seeing scale is no better than a constant. GOWC therefore treats forecast seeing as indicative, shows measured values wherever a public site monitor exists, and states which outputs are measured, calibrated or unvalidated.
ER -