Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Scaling Laws for Parameter Setting in Digitized Counterdiabatic QAOA

Abstract

Optimizing parameters separately for each problem instance limits the reuse of variational quantum algorithms. We develop empirical scaling laws for parameter setting in the digitized counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DC-QAOA) for weighted MaxCut. The prescription combines exact covariance under uniform edge-weight rescaling with power laws in mean degree fitted separately to offline-optimized cost and counterdiabatic angles. After the weight and degree scales are removed, the optimized angles of different training graphs cluster around common amplitudes, so a small coefficient table suffices. Frozen coefficients assign angles from a target graph's mean degree and root-mean-square edge weight without target-instance variational optimization. In ideal-circuit simulations across 1050 test graphs spanning ten graph families and five positive edge-weight distributions, mean optimal-solution probability is higher than that of the fixed-angle quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) at each depth from one to four layers, reaching 19.36% versus 13.11% at four layers. A six-layer extension on 600 graphs also shows a mean probability advantage. Hardware execution on the IBM Quantum processor ibm_fez for 21 unit-weight 3-regular graphs shows a mean probability advantage at one layer, while the ordering reverses at two layers. In separate energy-based experiments, direct assignment gives a higher mean approximation ratio than random-start optimization reaches within 500 evaluations, and refinement started from the formula angles improves it further. These results show how a scaling-based representation of optimized angles can guide parameter reuse across graph instances, enabling direct parameter assignment without target-instance variational optimization and providing initial angles for local refinement.

Related

  1. Crossing over universal scaling laws in two-dimensional driven dissipative condensates
    Q. Fontaine, F. Helluin, M. Escalera +8
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral physicsHAL
  2. Thermal scaling laws for open-water swimming
    Henry van den Bedem, Ellen Kuhl
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBiological & medical physicsarXiv
  3. Dropout Universality: Scaling Laws and Optimal Scheduling at the Edge-of-Chaos
    Lucas Fernandez Sarmiento
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Detectability limits of scaling laws
    Alec Kirkley
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  5. Edge energy fluctuation: A unified theory of friction scaling laws in twisted layered material interfaces
    Ze Liu
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textCondensed matterarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026scaling,
  title = {{Scaling Laws for Parameter Setting in Digitized Counterdiabatic QAOA}},
  author = {Yaocheng Chen and Jiapei Zhuang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.00573},
  eprint = {2611.00573},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00573},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Scaling Laws for Parameter Setting in Digitized Counterdiabatic QAOA
AU  - Yaocheng Chen
AU  - Jiapei Zhuang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.00573
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00573
AB  - Optimizing parameters separately for each problem instance limits the reuse of variational quantum algorithms. We develop empirical scaling laws for parameter setting in the digitized counterdiabatic quantum approximate optimization algorithm (DC-QAOA) for weighted MaxCut. The prescription combines exact covariance under uniform edge-weight rescaling with power laws in mean degree fitted separately to offline-optimized cost and counterdiabatic angles. After the weight and degree scales are removed, the optimized angles of different training graphs cluster around common amplitudes, so a small coefficient table suffices. Frozen coefficients assign angles from a target graph's mean degree and root-mean-square edge weight without target-instance variational optimization. In ideal-circuit simulations across 1050 test graphs spanning ten graph families and five positive edge-weight distributions, mean optimal-solution probability is higher than that of the fixed-angle quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) at each depth from one to four layers, reaching 19.36% versus 13.11% at four layers. A six-layer extension on 600 graphs also shows a mean probability advantage. Hardware execution on the IBM Quantum processor ibm_fez for 21 unit-weight 3-regular graphs shows a mean probability advantage at one layer, while the ordering reverses at two layers. In separate energy-based experiments, direct assignment gives a higher mean approximation ratio than random-start optimization reaches within 500 evaluations, and refinement started from the formula angles improves it further. These results show how a scaling-based representation of optimized angles can guide parameter reuse across graph instances, enabling direct parameter assignment without target-instance variational optimization and providing initial angles for local refinement.
ER  -