Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Flatness-Preserving Operations

Abstract

A quantum state is called flat if it is proportional to a projector. There has been recent interest in studying antiflatness, the property of diverging from flat states, and establishing a resource theory for it. Identifying the free operations (the Flatness-Preserving Operations (FPOs)) remained an open problem. For this purpose, we first discuss Orthogonality-Preserving Operations (OPOs), of which trivial examples are unitary operations in an isolated system. More generally, we give a simple proof that all OPOs are isometric embeddings consisting of combinations of unitaries/isometries and appending a fixed state. We then show that all FPOs are either constant maps to some fixed flat state or a special case of an OPO, where the appended fixed state must be a flat state. We also show that the only possible flat convex combinations of flat states are those of orthogonal flat states with weights given by their purities.

Related

  1. Fate of average symmetry-protected topological states under symmetry-preserving quantum operations
    Yoshihito Kuno, Takahiro Orito
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Inscription method for chirped fiber Bragg gratings with high spectral flatness based on a nonlinear phase mask
    Yangning Guo, Kerong Jiao, Yuqi Bi +4
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsOptics & photonicsCrossref
  3. Activity-induced emergent flatness, instabilities and pattern formation in fluid membranes
    Debayan Jana, Astik Haldar, Abhik Basu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  4. Entanglement, anti-flatness, and nonlocal nonstabilizerness: a unified perspective from entanglement spectrum
    Lei-Yi-Nan Liu, Jian Cui
    arXivPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Flatness-based control of nonlinear complex networks
    I. Sendiña-Nadal, I. Leyva, J. P. Barbot +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{veltheim2026flatnesspreserving,
  title = {{Flatness-Preserving Operations}},
  author = {Otto Veltheim and Esko Keski-Vakkuri},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.30697},
  eprint = {2608.30697},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30697},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Flatness-Preserving Operations
AU  - Otto Veltheim
AU  - Esko Keski-Vakkuri
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/31
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.30697
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.30697
AB  - A quantum state is called flat if it is proportional to a projector. There has been recent interest in studying antiflatness, the property of diverging from flat states, and establishing a resource theory for it. Identifying the free operations (the Flatness-Preserving Operations (FPOs)) remained an open problem. For this purpose, we first discuss Orthogonality-Preserving Operations (OPOs), of which trivial examples are unitary operations in an isolated system. More generally, we give a simple proof that all OPOs are isometric embeddings consisting of combinations of unitaries/isometries and appending a fixed state. We then show that all FPOs are either constant maps to some fixed flat state or a special case of an OPO, where the appended fixed state must be a flat state. We also show that the only possible flat convex combinations of flat states are those of orthogonal flat states with weights given by their purities.
ER  -