Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BY-NC-NDmedRxiv

Continuous theta-burst stimulation to a lesion network in cervical dystonia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot trial

6 more authors
  1. 1Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

Abstract

BackgroundThe mechanisms driving cervical dystonia remain unclear, limiting effective, non-invasive treatment development. Lesion network mapping previously localized a brain network derived from lesions causing cervical dystonia, with a network hub in the somatosensory cortex, a viable target for non-invasive brain stimulation.

ObjectivesWe conducted a randomized, sham-controlled, crossover trial administering continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) to the S1 lesion network hub, testing whether modulating this network reduces CD symptoms.

MethodsThirteen idiopathic cervical dystonia patients (57.85 {+/-} 10.85 years) received two 10-session blocks of bilateral somatosensory cortex cTBS (active or sham; counterbalanced). The primary outcome was change in cervical dystonia symptoms, measured by the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Scale (TWSTRS). A wearable motion sensor objectively measured change in head and neck movement patterns. Motor evoked potentials and resting-state fMRI assessed cTBS-induced changes in corticospinal excitability and functional connectivity, respectively.

ResultsActive cTBS did not significantly reduce cervical dystonia symptoms compared to sham (condition x timepoint interaction: p = .149). Range of motion significantly increased with active, versus sham, cTBS (p = .015). Corticospinal excitability decreased following sham (p = .042), but not active, cTBS. No significant connectivity changes were seen from the somatosensory cortex stimulation site after active cTBS; however, significant changes emerged from the globus pallidus interna.

ConclusionThis study prospectively tested the effects of neuromodulation on a lesion network mapping-derived target. Active cTBS did not significantly improve TWSTRS scores relative to sham. The intervention was well tolerated by all patients, and future studies could consider higher-dose or alternative protocols to this target.

Related

  1. Changes in the Cutaneous Silent Period Following Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Cervical Dystonia
    Eiichirou Urasaki, Yasushi Miyagi
    Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCPMC
  2. Cerebellar Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation for Insomnia Disorder: A Randomized Sham‐Controlled Trial
    Xin‐Yao Liu, Dong Dong, Chang‐Geng Song +9
    CNS Neuroscience & TherapeuticsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyPMCEurope PMC
  3. Conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation shows no short-term safety signal in painful cervical dystonia: a pilot prospective study.
    Jason Becker, Jonathan Epstein, Solène Frismand +1
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Stimulation on Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
    Ayşe Nur Oymak Soysal, Şule Şimşek, Atiye Kaş Özdemir +2
    Sports HealthPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textGeneral medicinePMC
  5. Fronto-temporal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a randomized sham-controlled trial
    Milad Kadkhoda, Behnam Ghabel Damirchi, Fatemeh Sadat Raeisian +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{morrisonham2026continuous,
  title = {{Continuous theta-burst stimulation to a lesion network in cervical dystonia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot trial}},
  author = {J. Morrison-Ham and E. F. P. Younger and E. G. Ellis and N. Parsons and T. Hart and B. Speranza and L. Dipnall and M. Do and R. Perellon-Alfonso and P. M. Pecoraro and L. di Biase and K. L. Bertram and P. A. Aguis and F. Morgante and J. Joutsa and A. T. Hill and P. G. Enticott and D. T. Corp},
  howpublished = {medRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.09.10.26362783},
  url = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.10.26362783v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Continuous theta-burst stimulation to a lesion network in cervical dystonia: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot trial
AU  - J. Morrison-Ham
AU  - E. F. P. Younger
AU  - E. G. Ellis
AU  - N. Parsons
AU  - T. Hart
AU  - B. Speranza
AU  - L. Dipnall
AU  - M. Do
AU  - R. Perellon-Alfonso
AU  - P. M. Pecoraro
AU  - L. di Biase
AU  - K. L. Bertram
AU  - P. A. Aguis
AU  - F. Morgante
AU  - J. Joutsa
AU  - A. T. Hill
AU  - P. G. Enticott
AU  - D. T. Corp
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - medRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.09.10.26362783
UR  - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.09.10.26362783v1
AB  - BackgroundThe mechanisms driving cervical dystonia remain unclear, limiting effective, non-invasive treatment development. Lesion network mapping previously localized a brain network derived from lesions causing cervical dystonia, with a network hub in the somatosensory cortex, a viable target for non-invasive brain stimulation.  ObjectivesWe conducted a randomized, sham-controlled, crossover trial administering continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) to the S1 lesion network hub, testing whether modulating this network reduces CD symptoms.  MethodsThirteen idiopathic cervical dystonia patients (57.85 {+/-} 10.85 years) received two 10-session blocks of bilateral somatosensory cortex cTBS (active or sham; counterbalanced). The primary outcome was change in cervical dystonia symptoms, measured by the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Scale (TWSTRS). A wearable motion sensor objectively measured change in head and neck movement patterns. Motor evoked potentials and resting-state fMRI assessed cTBS-induced changes in corticospinal excitability and functional connectivity, respectively.  ResultsActive cTBS did not significantly reduce cervical dystonia symptoms compared to sham (condition x timepoint interaction: p = .149). Range of motion significantly increased with active, versus sham, cTBS (p = .015). Corticospinal excitability decreased following sham (p = .042), but not active, cTBS. No significant connectivity changes were seen from the somatosensory cortex stimulation site after active cTBS; however, significant changes emerged from the globus pallidus interna.  ConclusionThis study prospectively tested the effects of neuromodulation on a lesion network mapping-derived target. Active cTBS did not significantly improve TWSTRS scores relative to sham. The intervention was well tolerated by all patients, and future studies could consider higher-dose or alternative protocols to this target.
ER  -