Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
PreprintCC0arXiv

Radio and X-ray Observations of the Transitional Supernova 2019yvr: Insights into the Progenitor Mass-Loss History

Abstract

The final life stages of the massive star progenitors of stripped-envelope supernovae (SESNe) are still an open question, especially when it comes to the timing and magnitude of the progenitor stripping. Observing SESNe across the electromagnetic spectrum allows for the most direct constraints on mass loss in the final stages of progenitor evolution. In this work, we present radio (GMRT+VLA) and X-ray (Swift+Chandra) observations of SN 2019yvr obtained from 18-1786 days post-explosion. SN 2019yvr was a type Ib supernova (SN Ib, with strong helium but little or no hydrogen features) that transitioned into a type IIn supernova (SN IIn, with shock-driven hydrogen features from interaction with circumstellar material (CSM)) at ∼ 100 days post-explosion. The radio evolution is best-fit by a synchrotron self-absorbed model with a ρ∝ r−1.54 ± 0.31 CSM density profile, suggesting a decreasing mass-loss rate from the progenitor in the years leading up to the explosion. The radio-derived shock speed is high, more than 30,000 km/s at early times, suggesting a compact progenitor star. The combined radio and X-ray data probe CSM that extends from 1.7 × 1016 cm up to ∼ 20×1016 cm and was created by mass loss from $\sim (1-6) \times10^{-5} \rm{M_{\odot} yr^{-1}} $ (assuming a CSM speed of 100 km/s). The combined dataset rules out any \emph{dramatic} jump in CSM density (which was seen in the optical analog SN 2014C) associated with the emergence of optical hydrogen emission lines. We place SN 2019yvr in context with similar transitional SNe and discuss implications for the progenitor.

Related

  1. SN 2026dix: a nearby, transitional Type IIb/Ib supernova consistent with a warm supergiant progenitor
    Tamás Szalai, Schuyler D. Van Dyk, Dominik Bánhidi +20
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  2. A three-dimensional exploration of magnetic fields, rotation, and shock revival in a 39 M⊙ core-collapse supernova progenitor
    Liubov Kovalenko, Evan O'Connor, Haakon Andresen +1
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsHigh-energy astrophysicsCrossref
  3. Type Ia supernova population machine – I. A unified cosmological simulation–binary synthesis framework establishing non-universal delay-time distributions and cosmic progenitor-channel dominance crossover
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0High-energy astrophysicsOUP
  4. Flavor Conversion Enhances or Suppresses Supernova Explodability Independent of the Progenitor Mass
    Mariam Gogilashvili, Irene Tamborra
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
  5. Structure of Convective-Reactive Zone in a Supernova Progenitor
    M. Mocak, C. Meakin, F. Rizzuti +5
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy astrophysicsSolar & stellar physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{baerway2026radio,
  title = {{Radio and X-ray Observations of the Transitional Supernova 2019yvr: Insights into the Progenitor Mass-Loss History}},
  author = {Raphael Baer-Way and Poonam Chandra and Maryam Modjaz and A. J. Nayana and Keiichi Maeda and Katie Auchettl and Maria R. Drout and Charles D. Kilpatrick and Alak K. Ray and Stuart D. Ryder},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.05500},
  eprint = {2607.05500},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05500},
  note = {CC0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Radio and X-ray Observations of the Transitional Supernova 2019yvr: Insights into the Progenitor Mass-Loss History
AU  - Raphael Baer-Way
AU  - Poonam Chandra
AU  - Maryam Modjaz
AU  - A. J. Nayana
AU  - Keiichi Maeda
AU  - Katie Auchettl
AU  - Maria R. Drout
AU  - Charles D. Kilpatrick
AU  - Alak K. Ray
AU  - Stuart D. Ryder
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.05500
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.05500
AB  - The final life stages of the massive star progenitors of stripped-envelope supernovae (SESNe) are still an open question, especially when it comes to the timing and magnitude of the progenitor stripping. Observing SESNe across the electromagnetic spectrum allows for the most direct constraints on mass loss in the final stages of progenitor evolution. In this work, we present radio (GMRT+VLA) and X-ray (Swift+Chandra) observations of SN 2019yvr obtained from 18-1786 days post-explosion. SN 2019yvr was a type Ib supernova (SN Ib, with strong helium but little or no hydrogen features) that transitioned into a type IIn supernova (SN IIn, with shock-driven hydrogen features from interaction with circumstellar material (CSM)) at ∼ 100 days post-explosion. The radio evolution is best-fit by a synchrotron self-absorbed model with a ρ∝ r^−1.54 ± 0.31 CSM density profile, suggesting a decreasing mass-loss rate from the progenitor in the years leading up to the explosion. The radio-derived shock speed is high, more than 30,000 km/s at early times, suggesting a compact progenitor star. The combined radio and X-ray data probe CSM that extends from 1.7 × 10^16 cm up to ∼ 20×10^16 cm and was created by mass loss from $\sim (1-6) \times10^{-5} \rm{M_{\odot} yr^{-1}} $ (assuming a CSM speed of 100 km/s). The combined dataset rules out any \emph{dramatic} jump in CSM density (which was seen in the optical analog SN 2014C) associated with the emergence of optical hydrogen emission lines. We place SN 2019yvr in context with similar transitional SNe and discuss implications for the progenitor.
ER  -