Time-restricted feeding during the inactive phase vs. ad libitum feeding: diet-dependent effects on weight and metabolic markers in male Wistar rats.
4 affiliations
- 1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
- 2Animal Application and Research Center, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
- 3Department of Health Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
- 4Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Abstract
Background/objectives
In recent years, intermittent fasting has become a popular method for preventing and treating obesity and chronic diseases. This study explored the metabolic and inflammatory effects of inactive-phase (Day) time-restricted feeding (TRF) vs. ad libitum feeding (Ad) in rats under high-fat (HF) and standard (S) diet for 8 weeks.Methods
Four groups (TRF + HF, TRF + S, Ad + S, Ad + HF; n = 7 each) were monitored for temporal changes in key biomarkers, including TNF-α, IL-6, LPS, insulin, glucose, and lipid profiles, and body weight. Baseline-adjusted two-way ANCOVA was used to evaluate the main effects of Diet and Feeding pattern and their interaction, with complementary multivariate analyses performed as sensitivity analyses.Results
Body weight was significantly associated with both Diet and Feeding pattern after baseline adjustment, with the greatest observed weight gain in Ad + HF and the smallest in TRF + S. TNF-α showed a significant Diet × Feeding interaction, characterized by marked reductions in both TRF groups and little change in Ad + HF. Lipid metabolism exhibited distinct interactions between diet type and feeding regimens. Total cholesterol levels increased in both ad libitum-fed groups, whereas a reduction was observed in the TRF + S group. Triglyceride responses also showed pronounced treatment effects, with the TRF + HF group demonstrating the greatest decrease over the intervention period. IL-6, LPS, insulin, glucose, and LDL-C did not display significant group × time interactions.Conclusions
Overall, inactive-phase time-restricted feeding was associated with lower weight gain, favorable changes in selected lipid parameters, and a reduction in TNF-α. No significant Diet × Feeding interactions were observed for IL-6 or LPS, indicating that the inflammatory findings were specific to TNF-α rather than reflective of a generalized anti-inflammatory effect. However, because food intake was not quantitatively measured, these differences cannot be attributed to meal timing independently of possible differences in total energy intake.
Related
- Time restricted feeding ameliorates colitis through clock-dependent and nutrition-dependent processes
- Targeting Gut Microbiota, Inflammation, and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Therapeutic Strategies and the Emerging Role of Time-Restricted Feeding
- Light-cycle time-restricted feeding remodels a hidden layer of the cardiac transcriptome through sex-specific transcript switching
- Time-restricted feeding reverses kidney fibrosis through reducing CD8+ T cell infiltration in obese mice
- Metabolic Changes During a Calorie‐Restricted, Fish‐Rich Ketogenic Diet Associated With Increased Circulating TMAO in Healthy Adults
BibTeX
@article{hajhamidiasl2026timerestricted,
title = {{Time-restricted feeding during the inactive phase vs. ad libitum feeding: diet-dependent effects on weight and metabolic markers in male Wistar rats.}},
author = {Ladan Hajhamidiasl and Murat Baş and Ozgur Yilmaz and Samed Ozer and Salim Yilmaz and Sedat Arslan},
journal = {Frontiers in nutrition},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3389/fnut.2026.1968504},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903068},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Time-restricted feeding during the inactive phase vs. ad libitum feeding: diet-dependent effects on weight and metabolic markers in male Wistar rats.
AU - Ladan Hajhamidiasl
AU - Murat Baş
AU - Ozgur Yilmaz
AU - Samed Ozer
AU - Salim Yilmaz
AU - Sedat Arslan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/06
JO - Frontiers in nutrition
DO - 10.3389/fnut.2026.1968504
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42903068
AB - Background/objectives In recent years, intermittent fasting has become a popular method for preventing and treating obesity and chronic diseases. This study explored the metabolic and inflammatory effects of inactive-phase (Day) time-restricted feeding (TRF) vs. ad libitum feeding (Ad) in rats under high-fat (HF) and standard (S) diet for 8 weeks.Methods Four groups (TRF + HF, TRF + S, Ad + S, Ad + HF; n = 7 each) were monitored for temporal changes in key biomarkers, including TNF-α, IL-6, LPS, insulin, glucose, and lipid profiles, and body weight. Baseline-adjusted two-way ANCOVA was used to evaluate the main effects of Diet and Feeding pattern and their interaction, with complementary multivariate analyses performed as sensitivity analyses.Results Body weight was significantly associated with both Diet and Feeding pattern after baseline adjustment, with the greatest observed weight gain in Ad + HF and the smallest in TRF + S. TNF-α showed a significant Diet × Feeding interaction, characterized by marked reductions in both TRF groups and little change in Ad + HF. Lipid metabolism exhibited distinct interactions between diet type and feeding regimens. Total cholesterol levels increased in both ad libitum-fed groups, whereas a reduction was observed in the TRF + S group. Triglyceride responses also showed pronounced treatment effects, with the TRF + HF group demonstrating the greatest decrease over the intervention period. IL-6, LPS, insulin, glucose, and LDL-C did not display significant group × time interactions.Conclusions Overall, inactive-phase time-restricted feeding was associated with lower weight gain, favorable changes in selected lipid parameters, and a reduction in TNF-α. No significant Diet × Feeding interactions were observed for IL-6 or LPS, indicating that the inflammatory findings were specific to TNF-α rather than reflective of a generalized anti-inflammatory effect. However, because food intake was not quantitatively measured, these differences cannot be attributed to meal timing independently of possible differences in total energy intake.
SN - 2296-861X
ER -