Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,952 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBiosensors

Advancing Biosensing Through Artificial Intelligence: Overcoming Conventional Limitations Towards Intelligent Diagnostic Systems.

  1. 1Department of Microbiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute (SRMC&RI), Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai 600116, India.
  2. 2Department of Computer Science and Medical Engineering, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Engineering and Technology (SRET), Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai 600116, India.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated with biosensors to improve signal processing, feature extraction, calibration, and clinical interpretation. However, analytical sensitivity and high internal validation accuracy do not necessarily translate into clinically useful or generalisable diagnostic performance. This review therefore reframes AI-enabled biosensing around clinical actionability rather than technological performance alone. We critically examine how AI can address signal noise, drift, matrix effects, and complex or high-dimensional biosensor outputs while evaluating how model selection should reflect data modality, dataset size, computational constraints, and intended deployment. Importantly, we distinguish the physical limit of detection (LoD) of the sensing system from algorithm-assisted effective detectability: AI cannot intrinsically lower the physical detection limit of a fixed transducer, but it can improve extraction and interpretation of weak signals near the noise floor. A central contribution of this review is a clinically actionable threshold framework that links representative biomarkers to decision-relevant concentration ranges, clarifying when further LoD reduction is clinically meaningful and when robustness, selectivity, dynamic range, calibration stability, and reproducibility matter more. We also critically appraise representative AI-enabled biosensor studies by sample size, validation strategy, reference standard, generalisability, interpretability, computational requirements, and evidence maturity, rather than headline accuracy alone. Across electrochemical, optical and spectroscopic, wearable, and point-of-care platforms, major translational barriers include biofouling, matrix interference, signal drift, dataset shift, insufficient external validation, privacy, and regulatory requirements. We conclude that progress in intelligent biosensing should be judged by reliable performance across clinically relevant ranges and demonstrated utility in real-world diagnostic workflows, rather than by progressively lower LoDs or isolated accuracy values alone.

Related

  1. Functional Biomaterials, Spatial Biosensing, and Artificial Intelligence
    Samuel Long
    ChemRxivPreprintCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  2. Integrating artificial intelligence and molecular simulation for peptide discovery: limitations, validation and decision-centered workflows
    Xu Wu, Wei Fu
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  3. Artificial Intelligence Powered End-to-End Agricultural Machinery: Intelligent Transformation of Design and Maintenance Systems
    Shengnan Tang, Xuhua Chen, Yong Zhu
    Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  4. Design and Experimental Validation of an Embedded Edge Artificial Intelligence Camera System for Real-Time Intelligent Vision
    Hsiu-Ying Hwang, Fu-Hsiang Huang
    Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textEurope PMC
  5. Bridging the Translational Gap in Artificial Intelligence for Otology and Neurotology: Clinical Readiness, Limitations, and Research Priorities
    Pasquale Viola, Teodoro Aragona, Pietro De Luca +6
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{vijayaraj2026advancing,
  title = {{Advancing Biosensing Through Artificial Intelligence: Overcoming Conventional Limitations Towards Intelligent Diagnostic Systems.}},
  author = {Tarika Devi Vijayaraj and Rakshitha Karpagarajan and Sairam B Subramaniam and Durgashini Annamalai and Swati Kumari},
  journal = {Biosensors},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/bios16100537},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930084},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Advancing Biosensing Through Artificial Intelligence: Overcoming Conventional Limitations Towards Intelligent Diagnostic Systems.
AU  - Tarika Devi Vijayaraj
AU  - Rakshitha Karpagarajan
AU  - Sairam B Subramaniam
AU  - Durgashini Annamalai
AU  - Swati Kumari
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/25
JO  - Biosensors
DO  - 10.3390/bios16100537
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930084
AB  - Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated with biosensors to improve signal processing, feature extraction, calibration, and clinical interpretation. However, analytical sensitivity and high internal validation accuracy do not necessarily translate into clinically useful or generalisable diagnostic performance. This review therefore reframes AI-enabled biosensing around clinical actionability rather than technological performance alone. We critically examine how AI can address signal noise, drift, matrix effects, and complex or high-dimensional biosensor outputs while evaluating how model selection should reflect data modality, dataset size, computational constraints, and intended deployment. Importantly, we distinguish the physical limit of detection (LoD) of the sensing system from algorithm-assisted effective detectability: AI cannot intrinsically lower the physical detection limit of a fixed transducer, but it can improve extraction and interpretation of weak signals near the noise floor. A central contribution of this review is a clinically actionable threshold framework that links representative biomarkers to decision-relevant concentration ranges, clarifying when further LoD reduction is clinically meaningful and when robustness, selectivity, dynamic range, calibration stability, and reproducibility matter more. We also critically appraise representative AI-enabled biosensor studies by sample size, validation strategy, reference standard, generalisability, interpretability, computational requirements, and evidence maturity, rather than headline accuracy alone. Across electrochemical, optical and spectroscopic, wearable, and point-of-care platforms, major translational barriers include biofouling, matrix interference, signal drift, dataset shift, insufficient external validation, privacy, and regulatory requirements. We conclude that progress in intelligent biosensing should be judged by reliable performance across clinically relevant ranges and demonstrated utility in real-world diagnostic workflows, rather than by progressively lower LoDs or isolated accuracy values alone.
SN  - 2079-6374
ER  -