Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
181,713 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Medical Case Reports

Medically refractory epilepsy comorbid with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and intellectual disability in a patient with balanced t(14;X) translocation: a case report

  1. 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA
  2. 2Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY USA

Abstract

Background: Epilepsy affects over 50 million people worldwide, and approximately 30% of cases are treatment-resistant. Neuromodulatory therapies such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior thalamic nuclei can reduce seizure frequency in these patients but carry risks to behavior and mood. Balanced X-autosome translocations, including t(14;X), have been implicated in intellectual disability and epilepsy and represent a rare potential genetic contributor to treatment-resistant epilepsy. We report a case that illustrates both the psychiatric risks of DBS and the possible genetic basis of refractory epilepsy.

Case presentation: We present the case of a white American woman in her 30 s with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE), psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, intellectual disability, psychosis, and a maternally inherited balanced t(14;X)(q32.3;p11.2) translocation. Her mother also carries the same translocation and has a history of refractory epilepsy, psychosis, and cutaneous telangiectasias. Despite multiple antiepileptic drugs, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior thalamic nuclei, she continues to experience daily seizures. DBS implantation led to approximately 20% seizure reduction but was complicated by worsening behavioral disturbances, consistent with reported psychiatric side effects and the phenomenon of forced normalization.

Conclusions: This case highlights the complex interplay between epilepsy, psychiatric comorbidities, and neurostimulation, as well as the potential genetic underpinnings of TRE. The association of balanced X-autosome translocations with intellectual disability and epilepsy suggests pathogenic disruption of neurodevelopmental genes influencing inhibitory signaling. Awareness of psychiatric risks in DBS recipients and consideration of genetic etiologies are essential for optimizing management strategies in refractory epilepsy.

Related

  1. Staged surgical management of an acute angle-closure crisis with medically refractory intraocular pressure elevation : A case report and literature review
    Yuecong Yin, Yingjie Chen, Xiaofeng Zhang +1
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. How often do Australian government-funded interventional trials exclude adults with intellectual disability? A retrospective registry analysis of ANZCTR records, 2022-2024.
    Andrea Kargodorian, Rebecca Christidis, Jenny Downs +2
    BMJ openPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  3. An adaptive technical and behavioral approach for biomarker acquisition in autism with intellectual disability
    C. J. Stevens, S. Eberle, C. Carrow +5
    medRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthmedRxiv
  4. Nutraceutical, Nutritional and Phytotherapeutic Interventions for Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Intellectual Disability: Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence
    Federica Cernigliaro, Alessandra Giliberti, Rosaria Nardello
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
  5. Exome-wide rare variant genetic load is associated with cognition, intellectual disability and psychiatric disorders in population-based cohorts
    M. Ahangari, S. M. Moore, J. Schleede +3
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textHuman geneticsmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{feng2026medically,
  title = {{Medically refractory epilepsy comorbid with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and intellectual disability in a patient with balanced t(14;X) translocation: a case report}},
  author = {Henry Y. Feng and Ping Li},
  journal = {Journal of Medical Case Reports},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s13256-026-06432-x},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-026-06432-x},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Medically refractory epilepsy comorbid with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and intellectual disability in a patient with balanced t(14;X) translocation: a case report
AU  - Henry Y. Feng
AU  - Ping Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/31
JO  - Journal of Medical Case Reports
DO  - 10.1186/s13256-026-06432-x
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-026-06432-x
AB  - Background: Epilepsy affects over 50 million people worldwide, and approximately 30% of cases are treatment-resistant. Neuromodulatory therapies such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior thalamic nuclei can reduce seizure frequency in these patients but carry risks to behavior and mood. Balanced X-autosome translocations, including t(14;X), have been implicated in intellectual disability and epilepsy and represent a rare potential genetic contributor to treatment-resistant epilepsy. We report a case that illustrates both the psychiatric risks of DBS and the possible genetic basis of refractory epilepsy.  Case presentation: We present the case of a white American woman in her 30 s with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE), psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, intellectual disability, psychosis, and a maternally inherited balanced t(14;X)(q32.3;p11.2) translocation. Her mother also carries the same translocation and has a history of refractory epilepsy, psychosis, and cutaneous telangiectasias. Despite multiple antiepileptic drugs, vagus nerve stimulation, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior thalamic nuclei, she continues to experience daily seizures. DBS implantation led to approximately 20% seizure reduction but was complicated by worsening behavioral disturbances, consistent with reported psychiatric side effects and the phenomenon of forced normalization.  Conclusions: This case highlights the complex interplay between epilepsy, psychiatric comorbidities, and neurostimulation, as well as the potential genetic underpinnings of TRE. The association of balanced X-autosome translocations with intellectual disability and epilepsy suggests pathogenic disruption of neurodevelopmental genes influencing inhibitory signaling. Awareness of psychiatric risks in DBS recipients and consideration of genetic etiologies are essential for optimizing management strategies in refractory epilepsy.
SN  - 1752-1947
ER  -