Meniscal Repair Achieves Comparable Mid‐Term Functional Performance to Partial Meniscectomy Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Highly Active Patients
- 1Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Department Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University Beijing China
- 2Key Laboratory of Sports Trauma and Rehabilitation of the General Administration of Sport of China Beijing China
Abstract
Objective Concomitant meniscal injuries accompany 40%–60% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. Surgeons often face a clinical choice between meniscal repair, which prioritizes long‐term joint preservation, and partial meniscectomy, which is traditionally perceived to facilitate earlier functional recovery. Despite the biological advantages of repair, persistent concerns remain that its restrictive postoperative protocols might impede mid‐term functional performance compared to meniscectomy. This study aims to compare quadriceps/hamstring strength, dynamic balance, functional hop performance, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROMs) at 2–5 years post‐ACLR between patients undergoing concomitant meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated highly active patients who underwent ACLR between 2019 and 2023. Of 68 patients who underwent ACLR with a concomitant meniscal injury and a pre‐injury Tegner score ≥ 6,16 were excluded: 5 due to revision ACLR or secondary meniscal procedures during the follow‐up period, 8 due to concurrent multi‐ligament injuries or full‐thickness articular cartilage defects requiring surgery, and 3 due to knee joint deformities (varus or valgus malalignment > 5°)The remaining 52 patients were stratified into meniscal repair (n = 20) or partial meniscectomy (n = 32) groups. Outcomes included isokinetic strength (60°/s, 180°/s; Limb Symmetry Index, LSI), Y‐balance test, single‐leg hop (SLH), and PROMs (IKDC, Lysholm, and ACL‐RSI). Results At mid‐term follow‐up (mean 4.1 ± 1.2 years for repair, 4.2 ± 1.2 years for meniscectomy; p = 0.59), no significant differences existed in strength (quadriceps/hamstring LSI 60°/s and 180°/s), dynamic balance (Y‐balance), hop tests (SLH, SLCH, and SLTH), or PROMs (all p > 0.05). Conclusion At mid‐term follow‐up (2–5 years), concomitant meniscal repair yielded objective functional performance and patient‐reported outcomes equivalent to partial meniscectomy in highly active patients undergoing ACLR, despite more restrictive early rehabilitation. These findings indicate that the initial postoperative restrictions associated with repair do not result in persistent functional deficits. Although meniscal preservation confers established long‐term chondroprotective advantages, the present analysis addresses functional parity only; the surgical strategy should weigh both mid‐term function and long‐term joint health on an individual basis.
Related
- Free Innervated Gracilis Muscular Flap for Functional Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Following Desmoid Tumor Resection: A Case Report and Literature Review
- Augmentation of single muscle fiber residual force enhancement and functional performance following 12 weeks of eccentric training in older adults
- A Comparative Study of Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon versus Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft
- Impact of neuromuscular and visuo-motor training on landing biomechanics, functional performance, and psychological factors in female athletes with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a simple parallel-group randomized controlled trial
- Endoscopic accessibility and conduit passage after retrosternal vs. posterior mediastinal gastric conduit reconstruction following McKeown esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study
BibTeX
@article{duan2026meniscal,
title = {{Meniscal Repair Achieves Comparable Mid‐Term Functional Performance to Partial Meniscectomy Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Highly Active Patients}},
author = {Hao Duan and Haiyang Zhang and Jingyi Sun and Xiaohan Zhang and Tao Li and Jingbin Zhou},
journal = {Orthopaedic Surgery},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1111/os.70419},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70419},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Meniscal Repair Achieves Comparable Mid‐Term Functional Performance to Partial Meniscectomy Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Highly Active Patients
AU - Hao Duan
AU - Haiyang Zhang
AU - Jingyi Sun
AU - Xiaohan Zhang
AU - Tao Li
AU - Jingbin Zhou
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
JO - Orthopaedic Surgery
DO - 10.1111/os.70419
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70419
AB - Objective Concomitant meniscal injuries accompany 40%–60% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures. Surgeons often face a clinical choice between meniscal repair, which prioritizes long‐term joint preservation, and partial meniscectomy, which is traditionally perceived to facilitate earlier functional recovery. Despite the biological advantages of repair, persistent concerns remain that its restrictive postoperative protocols might impede mid‐term functional performance compared to meniscectomy. This study aims to compare quadriceps/hamstring strength, dynamic balance, functional hop performance, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROMs) at 2–5 years post‐ACLR between patients undergoing concomitant meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated highly active patients who underwent ACLR between 2019 and 2023. Of 68 patients who underwent ACLR with a concomitant meniscal injury and a pre‐injury Tegner score ≥ 6,16 were excluded: 5 due to revision ACLR or secondary meniscal procedures during the follow‐up period, 8 due to concurrent multi‐ligament injuries or full‐thickness articular cartilage defects requiring surgery, and 3 due to knee joint deformities (varus or valgus malalignment > 5°)The remaining 52 patients were stratified into meniscal repair (n = 20) or partial meniscectomy (n = 32) groups. Outcomes included isokinetic strength (60°/s, 180°/s; Limb Symmetry Index, LSI), Y‐balance test, single‐leg hop (SLH), and PROMs (IKDC, Lysholm, and ACL‐RSI). Results At mid‐term follow‐up (mean 4.1 ± 1.2 years for repair, 4.2 ± 1.2 years for meniscectomy; p = 0.59), no significant differences existed in strength (quadriceps/hamstring LSI 60°/s and 180°/s), dynamic balance (Y‐balance), hop tests (SLH, SLCH, and SLTH), or PROMs (all p > 0.05). Conclusion At mid‐term follow‐up (2–5 years), concomitant meniscal repair yielded objective functional performance and patient‐reported outcomes equivalent to partial meniscectomy in highly active patients undergoing ACLR, despite more restrictive early rehabilitation. These findings indicate that the initial postoperative restrictions associated with repair do not result in persistent functional deficits. Although meniscal preservation confers established long‐term chondroprotective advantages, the present analysis addresses functional parity only; the surgical strategy should weigh both mid‐term function and long‐term joint health on an individual basis.
SN - 1757-7861
SN - 1757-7853
ER -