PreprintarXiv licencearXiv
Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators: the Case SL(2n+1)
Abstract
Recently we started building a bridge between two cases of Langlands duality. The latter is one of the most influential topics in mathematical research. It has many different appearances and influential subtopics. Yet there is a topic that until now seems unrelated to the Langlands program. That is the topic of invariant differential operators. That is strange since both items are deeply rooted in Harish-Chandra's representation theory of semisimple Lie groups. We started with the case of the group ~SL(2n). In the present paper we deal with the group SL(2n+1). The two mentioned groups are similar, but their representation theories is rather different.
Versions
Related
- Duflo--Serganova functor for chiral differential operators on classical invariant rings
- Differential Operators on G(r,n)-Invariant Functions
- Relative Langlands duality of the Bump-Friedberg-Ginzburg GSO6-integral
- Symplectic singularities in Relative Langlands duality for products of general linear groups
- Relative Langlands duality for linear periods
BibTeX
@misc{dobrev2026langlands,
title = {{Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators: the Case SL(2n+1)}},
author = {V. K. Dobrev},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.13400},
eprint = {2608.13400},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13400},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators: the Case SL(2n+1)
AU - V. K. Dobrev
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/17
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.13400
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13400
AB - Recently we started building a bridge between two cases of Langlands duality. The latter is one of the most influential topics in mathematical research. It has many different appearances and influential subtopics. Yet there is a topic that until now seems unrelated to the Langlands program. That is the topic of invariant differential operators. That is strange since both items are deeply rooted in Harish-Chandra's representation theory of semisimple Lie groups. We started with the case of the group ~SL(2n). In the present paper we deal with the group SL(2n+1). The two mentioned groups are similar, but their representation theories is rather different.
ER -