SWOT pixel cloud elevation accuracy assessment over synthetic small water bodies

Abstract

Accurate observations of water surface elevation (WSE) are essential for small waterbodies (WBs) due to their role in agriculture, biodiversity, and hydrology. This study (i) evaluates SWOT PIXC WSE accuracy over synthetic small WBs (0.5-50 ha) built along the shoreline of Lake Léman, Switzerland and (ii) assesses filtering criteria to improve WSE accuracy while preserving data. Pixel-scale accuracy is computed using SWOT pixels within a 50 m shoreline buffer, while WB-scale accuracy uses median pixel elevation per date. After outlier removal, pixels classified as water-edge (class 3) and open-water (class 4) provide the best accuracy, with a 1-sigma absolute error of 24.2 cm at the pixel scale. Aggregation at the WB scale substantially improves accuracy, reducing errors from ~17.4 cm (0.5 ha) to ~8 cm (50 ha). Eight filtering strategies were tested: a multivariable filter achieved the highest pixel accuracy (19 cm) but excluded ~58% of pixels, whereas simpler filters based on one or two variables produced similar accuracy (~20 cm) while removing only 17%-37% of observations, offering a more practical balance. At the WB scale, filtering is most beneficial for small WBs (0.5-3 ha), reducing error to 15.7 and 12.4 cm, respectively, while removing 12%-15% of days. For larger WBs (~50 ha), all strategies achieve ~8 cm accuracy, so strict filtering provides minimal benefit.

Dependence of seismic hazard assessment on the observation time interval: insights from a synthetic earthquake catalogue in southeastern Spain
Elena Pascual-Sánchez, José Antonio Álvarez-Gómez, Julián García-Mayordomo +1
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences27 Oct 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text2 citedGeophysics & seismologyCrossref
Toward Enhanced Water Detection in SWOT Pixel Clouds using Dynamic Graph Neural Networks
Christoph Baumann, Junyang Gou, Christian Schwatke +3
arXiv28 Sep 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyarXiv
Multi-annual sub-pixel land cover mapping with TESSERA latent embeddings
Franz Schug, David Klehr, Jari Mahler +1
EarthArXiv11 Sep 2026PreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral earth scienceEarthArXiv
Editorial: Dynamic exospheres of terrestrial bodies through the solar system
Dolon Bhattacharyya, Jean-Yves Chaufray, Gonzalo Cucho-Padin +2
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences27 May 2026Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physics General earth scienceHAL
The role of elevation, tree height and crown position on the carbon balance of trees at the southern Andes treeline
Alex Fajardo, Günter Hoch, Frida I Piper
Annals of Botany18 Jun 2026Peer-reviewedPublisher termsFull text1 citedClimate sciencePMC

Cite

BibTeX RIS

BibTeX

@article{karami2026swot,
  title = {{SWOT pixel cloud elevation accuracy assessment over synthetic small water bodies}},
  author = {Ayoob Karami and Nicolas Baghdadi and Yasser Nasrallah and Henri Bazzi and Cécile Cazals and Hind Oubanas and Cassandra Normandin and Frédéric Frappart},
  journal = {European Journal of Remote Sensing},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1080/22797254.2026.2695384},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05758323v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - SWOT pixel cloud elevation accuracy assessment over synthetic small water bodies
AU  - Ayoob Karami
AU  - Nicolas Baghdadi
AU  - Yasser Nasrallah
AU  - Henri Bazzi
AU  - Cécile Cazals
AU  - Hind Oubanas
AU  - Cassandra Normandin
AU  - Frédéric Frappart
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/03
JO  - European Journal of Remote Sensing
DO  - 10.1080/22797254.2026.2695384
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05758323v1
AB  - Accurate observations of water surface elevation (WSE) are essential for small waterbodies (WBs) due to their role in agriculture, biodiversity, and hydrology. This study (i) evaluates SWOT PIXC WSE accuracy over synthetic small WBs (0.5-50 ha) built along the shoreline of Lake Léman, Switzerland and (ii) assesses filtering criteria to improve WSE accuracy while preserving data. Pixel-scale accuracy is computed using SWOT pixels within a 50 m shoreline buffer, while WB-scale accuracy uses median pixel elevation per date. After outlier removal, pixels classified as water-edge (class 3) and open-water (class 4) provide the best accuracy, with a 1-sigma absolute error of 24.2 cm at the pixel scale. Aggregation at the WB scale substantially improves accuracy, reducing errors from ~17.4 cm (0.5 ha) to ~8 cm (50 ha). Eight filtering strategies were tested: a multivariable filter achieved the highest pixel accuracy (19 cm) but excluded ~58% of pixels, whereas simpler filters based on one or two variables produced similar accuracy (~20 cm) while removing only 17%-37% of observations, offering a more practical balance. At the WB scale, filtering is most beneficial for small WBs (0.5-3 ha), reducing error to 15.7 and 12.4 cm, respectively, while removing 12%-15% of days. For larger WBs (~50 ha), all strategies achieve ~8 cm accuracy, so strict filtering provides minimal benefit.
SN  - 2279-7254
ER  -

Abstract

Related

Cite