Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 11 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBMC Health Services Research

Understanding resilience among workers in elderly care: insights from a mixed-methods study

  1. 1Management and Healthcare Laboratory, Institute od Management, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies

Abstract

Background Workers in elderly care face demanding conditions that may affect both staff well-being and quality of care. Resilience has been identified as a protective factor in this context; however, evidence on its predictors in elderly care settings remains limited. This study investigated the personal-level and organizational-level predictors of individual resilience among healthcare workers employed in residential facilities for older adults and people with disabilities. Methods As part of the European Horizon 2020 project Support4Resilience, a cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted among healthcare professionals working in residential care facilities in Italy. Quantitative data were collected from 231 workers through an online questionnaire including validated measures of individual resilience, mental well-being, burnout, organizational resilience capacity, intention to leave, and self-rated health. Pearson correlations and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. To contextualize and expand the quantitative findings, four focus groups involving 16 healthcare workers and leaders were conducted. Qualitative data explored experiences related to workload, teamwork, professional responsibility, and relational aspects of care. Findings were integrated using a joint display mixed-methods approach. Results In multivariate analyses, mental well-being emerged as the strongest predictor of individual resilience. Organizational resilience capacity was also positively associated with individual resilience. Burnout, intention to leave, and self-rated health were not significantly associated with resilience. Qualitative findings converged with and enriched the quantitative results across four main themes. Relational meaning in care emerged as a key source of psychological reward and professional fulfilment, consistent with the strong association between mental well-being and resilience. Teamwork and coordination illustrated how organizational resilience is enacted through collaborative practices and structured communication. Workload and fatigue highlighted the structural pressures and moral burden associated with staffing shortages. Finally, a strong sense of professional responsibility toward residents, including emotional self-regulation and collective commitment, appeared to sustain engagement despite challenging working conditions. Conclusions Interventions aimed at strengthening teamwork, coordination, and organizational support, while promoting mental well-being, may help sustain a resilient workforce and support high-quality care for older adults and people with disabilities.

Related

  1. Factors associated with psychological resilience in healthcare workers during infectious disease outbreaks and pandemics – a Systematic review and critique of analytical approaches
    Georgia Petrou, Angela Crombie, Stephen Begg +3
    Systematic ReviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Psychiatry & mental healthCrossref
  2. Disaster resilience and belief in recovery conviction among the elderly.
    Sonay Bi̇lgi̇n, Selen Özdemi̇r, Gülsüm Aşan
    BMC public healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  3. Organizational patient safety culture and workforce well-being among healthcare workers: associations with resilience and work-life balance in a hospital-wide cross-sectional study.
    Mei-Fei Hsieh, Po-Ming Ku, Chin-Ming Chen
    BMC health services researchPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Perspectives of healthcare workers on sickle cell disease in tribal India: insights for strengthening the National Sickle Cell Anaemia Elimination Mission of India
    Suchitra Surve, Vanashree Malewar, Shahina Begum +3
    Journal of Community GeneticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textHuman geneticsPMC
  5. Self-reported understanding and attitudes of healthcare workers and caregivers toward artificial intelligence in pediatric healthcare in a children’s hospital in China: a cross-sectional study
    Si-Yu Chen, Li Yang, Qi-Gang Ding +3
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{cantarelli2026understanding,
  title = {{Understanding resilience among workers in elderly care: insights from a mixed-methods study}},
  author = {Paola Cantarelli and Luca Scopis and Jasna Pocek and Nicola Belle},
  journal = {BMC Health Services Research},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12913-026-15184-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15184-9},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Understanding resilience among workers in elderly care: insights from a mixed-methods study
AU  - Paola Cantarelli
AU  - Luca Scopis
AU  - Jasna Pocek
AU  - Nicola Belle
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - BMC Health Services Research
DO  - 10.1186/s12913-026-15184-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15184-9
AB  - Background Workers in elderly care face demanding conditions that may affect both staff well-being and quality of care. Resilience has been identified as a protective factor in this context; however, evidence on its predictors in elderly care settings remains limited. This study investigated the personal-level and organizational-level predictors of individual resilience among healthcare workers employed in residential facilities for older adults and people with disabilities. Methods As part of the European Horizon 2020 project Support4Resilience, a cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted among healthcare professionals working in residential care facilities in Italy. Quantitative data were collected from 231 workers through an online questionnaire including validated measures of individual resilience, mental well-being, burnout, organizational resilience capacity, intention to leave, and self-rated health. Pearson correlations and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. To contextualize and expand the quantitative findings, four focus groups involving 16 healthcare workers and leaders were conducted. Qualitative data explored experiences related to workload, teamwork, professional responsibility, and relational aspects of care. Findings were integrated using a joint display mixed-methods approach. Results In multivariate analyses, mental well-being emerged as the strongest predictor of individual resilience. Organizational resilience capacity was also positively associated with individual resilience. Burnout, intention to leave, and self-rated health were not significantly associated with resilience. Qualitative findings converged with and enriched the quantitative results across four main themes. Relational meaning in care emerged as a key source of psychological reward and professional fulfilment, consistent with the strong association between mental well-being and resilience. Teamwork and coordination illustrated how organizational resilience is enacted through collaborative practices and structured communication. Workload and fatigue highlighted the structural pressures and moral burden associated with staffing shortages. Finally, a strong sense of professional responsibility toward residents, including emotional self-regulation and collective commitment, appeared to sustain engagement despite challenging working conditions. Conclusions Interventions aimed at strengthening teamwork, coordination, and organizational support, while promoting mental well-being, may help sustain a resilient workforce and support high-quality care for older adults and people with disabilities.
SN  - 1472-6963
ER  -