Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
185,139 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Cancers

Immune Cell Landscape in the NSCLC Tumour Microenvironment: Molecular Dysregulation, Crosstalk and Insights into the CEMIP-STAT3-Mediated Immunosuppressive Axis

  1. 1Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumour Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
  2. 2Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumour Biological Behaviors, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China

Abstract

Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors has yielded meaningful clinical benefits for patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many patients still develop primary or acquired treatment resistance, a problem strongly tied to immunosuppressive features of the tumour microenvironment (TME). Multiple immune cell populations within the TME, including tumour-associated macrophages, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, regulatory T cells, Natural killer (NK) cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, interact via soluble mediators and cell-surface molecules. Disordered crosstalk between these cell populations promotes tumour immune escape and limits immunotherapy effectiveness. In this review, we summarise major molecular mechanisms that control immune-cell behaviour in the NSCLC TME, placing special emphasis on the Cell migration inducing hyaluronidase 1 (CEMIP)-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) axis described in pre-clinical work. Tumour-produced CEMIP is reported to promote macrophage polarisation toward an M2-like suppressive phenotype, putatively via an unidentified surface receptor and downstream STAT3 activation. This phenotypic shift in turn indirectly upregulates several inhibitory receptors on CD8+ T and Natural killer (NK) lymphocytes, offering a reasonable upstream mechanistic explanation for resistance to immune-checkpoint-blockade treatment. The supposed CEMIP receptor on monocytes has not yet been identified, and the possibility of indirect effects cannot be completely ruled out. For example, ECM remodeling or intermediary cellular signalling mediated by CEMIP is a possibility; for specific discussions. These unresolved mechanistic details, together with the lack of large-scale human NSCLC cohort validation, underscore that the CEMIP-STAT3 axis remains a pre-clinical observation requiring substantial further investigation before clinical translation can be contemplated. We therefore position this review as a critical, evidence-based assessment of the CEMIP–STAT3 hypothesis, rather than as a claim that this axis is an established driver of NSCLC immunosuppression.

Related

  1. Glioblastoma stem cell–immune microenvironment crosstalk: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities
    Chuanhai Xu, Linlin Chai, Wei Yuan
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textHuman geneticsCrossrefEurope PMC
  2. CNS localization drives a profoundly immunosuppressive microenvironment in B‑cell lymphoma
    Jenni Niemi, Oscar Badillo-Godinez, Mats Hellström
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossref
  3. Senescence-related immunosuppressive gene MFAP2 orchestrates stromal-immune crosstalk and immunotherapy resistance in gastric cancer.
    Yichan Hu, Liaoxiang Zhu, Lijun Zhou +6
    BMC cancerPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCPMC
  4. Zika virus oncolytic signaling reverts immunosuppressive and angiogenic glioblastoma microenvironment in vitro and in vivo
    G. Pinheiro Alves de Freitas, J. H. Quintanilla, J. M. Janeiro +14
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textOncologybioRxiv
  5. Dynamic Crosstalk Between TREM2+ Macrophages and the MASLD Hepatic Microenvironment
    Xinting Li, Chuchu Yu, Aojie Mao +3
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{wang2026immune,
  title = {{Immune Cell Landscape in the NSCLC Tumour Microenvironment: Molecular Dysregulation, Crosstalk and Insights into the CEMIP-STAT3-Mediated Immunosuppressive Axis}},
  author = {Lanqing Wang and Sisi Yan and Fajian He and Conghua Xie and Rui Bai},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18213451},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/21/3451},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Immune Cell Landscape in the NSCLC Tumour Microenvironment: Molecular Dysregulation, Crosstalk and Insights into the CEMIP-STAT3-Mediated Immunosuppressive Axis
AU  - Lanqing Wang
AU  - Sisi Yan
AU  - Fajian He
AU  - Conghua Xie
AU  - Rui Bai
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18213451
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/18/21/3451
AB  - Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors has yielded meaningful clinical benefits for patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many patients still develop primary or acquired treatment resistance, a problem strongly tied to immunosuppressive features of the tumour microenvironment (TME). Multiple immune cell populations within the TME, including tumour-associated macrophages, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, regulatory T cells, Natural killer (NK) cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, interact via soluble mediators and cell-surface molecules. Disordered crosstalk between these cell populations promotes tumour immune escape and limits immunotherapy effectiveness. In this review, we summarise major molecular mechanisms that control immune-cell behaviour in the NSCLC TME, placing special emphasis on the Cell migration inducing hyaluronidase 1 (CEMIP)-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) axis described in pre-clinical work. Tumour-produced CEMIP is reported to promote macrophage polarisation toward an M2-like suppressive phenotype, putatively via an unidentified surface receptor and downstream STAT3 activation. This phenotypic shift in turn indirectly upregulates several inhibitory receptors on CD8+ T and Natural killer (NK) lymphocytes, offering a reasonable upstream mechanistic explanation for resistance to immune-checkpoint-blockade treatment. The supposed CEMIP receptor on monocytes has not yet been identified, and the possibility of indirect effects cannot be completely ruled out. For example, ECM remodeling or intermediary cellular signalling mediated by CEMIP is a possibility; for specific discussions. These unresolved mechanistic details, together with the lack of large-scale human NSCLC cohort validation, underscore that the CEMIP-STAT3 axis remains a pre-clinical observation requiring substantial further investigation before clinical translation can be contemplated. We therefore position this review as a critical, evidence-based assessment of the CEMIP–STAT3 hypothesis, rather than as a claim that this axis is an established driver of NSCLC immunosuppression.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -