Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Pest Management Science

Cascading bottom‐up effects of invasive alien plants on the parasitoid Aphidius colemani mediated by the aphid host Aphis fabae

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive alien plants (IAP) can threaten biodiversity by disrupting trophic interactions and, consequently, affect agroecosystems by providing alternative resources for phytophagous insects at crop field margins. This may influence pest populations and parasitoid performance through bottom-up effects. We examined the cascading effects of three IAPs common at agroecosystem interfaces (Galinsoga quadriradiata, Reynoutria japonica, Senecio inaequidens) on a major pest, the black bean aphid (Aphis fabae), and its parasitoid Aphidius colemani, a widely used biological control agent. We assessed key life-history traits to evaluate both aphid host and parasitoid fitness, choosing Beta vulgaris as the control crop-plant, a cultivated host plant commonly infested by Aphis fabae, used here to compare the other effects relative to it. The traits evaluated here were aphid host mass and larviposition rate, parasitism ratio, parasitoid emergence ratio, parasitic success, female ratio, development time, mass, tibia length and egg load. RESULTS: We found contrasting suitability among the IAPs as host plants for Aphis fabae hosts and their effects on Aphidius colemani. On R. japonica, aphids showed high larviposition rates and developed successfully, reaching the adult stage with optimal mass after 9 days, and this IAP was also associated with the highest parasitoid performance. Conversely, S. inaequidens negatively impacted larviposition rates and the subsequent development of the offspring (which remained at a nymphal stage after 9 days and were lighter), but resulted in similar parasitoid performance compared to the control crop-plant, despite reduced aphid host performance. Finally, aphids failed to establish on G. quadriradiata, and consequently parasitoids did not establish either. CONCLUSION: Differences in host plants' suitability drove variations in both aphid host and parasitoid performance, which could ultimately influence potential top-down regulations. These results highlight the need to consider the ecological roles of IAPs when assessing their agronomic impact. Although they could act as reservoirs for aphid pests, some IAPs might also benefit pest management by supporting parasitoid populations, and contribute to broader ecosystem functions.

Related

  1. Characteristics of AgifCSP9 and Its Potential Involvement in Host Location by Aphidius gifuensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)
    Jun Jiang, Tao Huang, Huimin Qin +2
    InsectsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEurope PMC
  2. Cascading fishery collapse associated with thermal habitat degradation, marine heatwaves, and predator influx
    Seongsik Park, Seokjin Yoon, In-Cheol Lee +1
    Communications Earth & EnvironmentPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textEcologyCrossref
  3. How host self-regulation governs hyperparasitoid persistence in a caterpillar-parasitoid-trigonalid system
    Z. R. Rosales, J. M. Nava-Sedeno
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
  4. Density-Dependence and agricultural intensity affect host-parasite-parasitoid interactions in a bird-insect trophic system
    S. Coroller-Chouraki, J. Savage, M. Belisle
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textEcologybioRxiv
  5. Host‐Associated Differentiation in a Parasitoid Wasp Connected to Venom‐Related but Not Chemosensory Genes
    Xuyue Yang, Marco Fracassetti, Tanja Slotte +2
    Molecular ecologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGenetics & genomicsEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{pluchard2026cascading,
  title = {{Cascading bottom‐up effects of invasive alien plants on the parasitoid Aphidius colemani mediated by the aphid host Aphis fabae}},
  author = {Emma Pluchard and Aude Couty and Arnaud Ameline and Géraldine Doury},
  journal = {Pest Management Science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/ps.71406},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05820559v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cascading bottom‐up effects of invasive alien plants on the parasitoid Aphidius colemani mediated by the aphid host Aphis fabae
AU  - Emma Pluchard
AU  - Aude Couty
AU  - Arnaud Ameline
AU  - Géraldine Doury
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Pest Management Science
DO  - 10.1002/ps.71406
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05820559v1
AB  - BACKGROUND: Invasive alien plants (IAP) can threaten biodiversity by disrupting trophic interactions and, consequently, affect agroecosystems by providing alternative resources for phytophagous insects at crop field margins. This may influence pest populations and parasitoid performance through bottom-up effects. We examined the cascading effects of three IAPs common at agroecosystem interfaces (Galinsoga quadriradiata, Reynoutria japonica, Senecio inaequidens) on a major pest, the black bean aphid (Aphis fabae), and its parasitoid Aphidius colemani, a widely used biological control agent. We assessed key life-history traits to evaluate both aphid host and parasitoid fitness, choosing Beta vulgaris as the control crop-plant, a cultivated host plant commonly infested by Aphis fabae, used here to compare the other effects relative to it. The traits evaluated here were aphid host mass and larviposition rate, parasitism ratio, parasitoid emergence ratio, parasitic success, female ratio, development time, mass, tibia length and egg load. RESULTS: We found contrasting suitability among the IAPs as host plants for Aphis fabae hosts and their effects on Aphidius colemani. On R. japonica, aphids showed high larviposition rates and developed successfully, reaching the adult stage with optimal mass after 9 days, and this IAP was also associated with the highest parasitoid performance. Conversely, S. inaequidens negatively impacted larviposition rates and the subsequent development of the offspring (which remained at a nymphal stage after 9 days and were lighter), but resulted in similar parasitoid performance compared to the control crop-plant, despite reduced aphid host performance. Finally, aphids failed to establish on G. quadriradiata, and consequently parasitoids did not establish either. CONCLUSION: Differences in host plants' suitability drove variations in both aphid host and parasitoid performance, which could ultimately influence potential top-down regulations. These results highlight the need to consider the ecological roles of IAPs when assessing their agronomic impact. Although they could act as reservoirs for aphid pests, some IAPs might also benefit pest management by supporting parasitoid populations, and contribute to broader ecosystem functions.
SN  - 1526-498X
SN  - 1526-4998
ER  -