Optimizing genomic selection: A comparison of SNP selection strategies for reduced-density panels in beef cattle
- 1Purdue University College of Agriculture
Abstract
The exponential increase in the number of genotyped animals, combined with the availability of high-density SNP chips has introduced computational challenges for routine genomic evaluations, particularly during the construction of the genomic relationship matrix. Although higher-density SNP panels can facilitate the identification of causal mutations, their use substantially increases computational requirements without a proportional gain in genomic prediction performance. To optimize computational efficiency while maintaining accuracy of genomic predictions, this study compared five SNP selection strategies (i.e., random sampling, random sampling with inclusion of informative SNPs, linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based pruning, a Shannon entropy-based machine learning approach, and [[EQUATION]]-based prioritization) to develop reduced-density panels for Nellore cattle. Using high-density (HD) genotype data comprising 437,650 SNPs from 304,782 animals (after quality control) as reference, three reduced-density panels (25K, 45K, and 65K SNPs) panels were tested across five traits (i.e., Age at first calving, Stayability, Weaning weight, Yearling weight, Muscling) with diverse genetic architectures. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) derived from these reduced panels were compared to those obtained from the HD reference panel using Pearsons correlations, under both genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) methods. In the GBLUP model, prediction accuracy generally improved with increased marker density. Random selection with and without the informative SNPs consistently yielded the highest accuracies, whereas the [[EQUATION]]-based approach showed the lowest agreement with the HD reference across all densities. In contrast, ssGBLUP demonstrated strong robustness to marker reduction, producing uniformly high correlations {approx}1.00) across all SNP densities and selection strategies. These findings indicate that optimized low-density SNP panels maintain prediction accuracy comparable to HD panels, offering a cost-effective tool for large-scale genomic evaluations.
Related
- Optimizing progeny allocation strategies in breeding schemes while updating genomic prediction models.
- Combining different selection criteria into breeding strategies for short-term recurrent genomic selection
- Identification of germplasm and genomic markers associated with reduced T‐2 and HT‐2 mycotoxin accumulation in oat
- Optimizing plant species selection for automated monitoring of plant-pollinator interactions
- Optimizing sunflower performance through integrated irrigation and zeolite strategies in the north Nile Delta
BibTeX
@misc{ogunbawo2026optimizing,
title = {{Optimizing genomic selection: A comparison of SNP selection strategies for reduced-density panels in beef cattle}},
author = {A. R. Ogunbawo and H. A. Mulim and J. Hidalgo and H. T. Ventura and N. O. Souza and H. R. Oliveira},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.64898/2026.08.26.747408},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.26.747408v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Optimizing genomic selection: A comparison of SNP selection strategies for reduced-density panels in beef cattle
AU - A. R. Ogunbawo
AU - H. A. Mulim
AU - J. Hidalgo
AU - H. T. Ventura
AU - N. O. Souza
AU - H. R. Oliveira
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/26
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.08.26.747408
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.08.26.747408v1
AB - The exponential increase in the number of genotyped animals, combined with the availability of high-density SNP chips has introduced computational challenges for routine genomic evaluations, particularly during the construction of the genomic relationship matrix. Although higher-density SNP panels can facilitate the identification of causal mutations, their use substantially increases computational requirements without a proportional gain in genomic prediction performance. To optimize computational efficiency while maintaining accuracy of genomic predictions, this study compared five SNP selection strategies (i.e., random sampling, random sampling with inclusion of informative SNPs, linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based pruning, a Shannon entropy-based machine learning approach, and [[EQUATION]]-based prioritization) to develop reduced-density panels for Nellore cattle. Using high-density (HD) genotype data comprising 437,650 SNPs from 304,782 animals (after quality control) as reference, three reduced-density panels (25K, 45K, and 65K SNPs) panels were tested across five traits (i.e., Age at first calving, Stayability, Weaning weight, Yearling weight, Muscling) with diverse genetic architectures. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs) derived from these reduced panels were compared to those obtained from the HD reference panel using Pearsons correlations, under both genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) methods. In the GBLUP model, prediction accuracy generally improved with increased marker density. Random selection with and without the informative SNPs consistently yielded the highest accuracies, whereas the [[EQUATION]]-based approach showed the lowest agreement with the HD reference across all densities. In contrast, ssGBLUP demonstrated strong robustness to marker reduction, producing uniformly high correlations {approx}1.00) across all SNP densities and selection strategies. These findings indicate that optimized low-density SNP panels maintain prediction accuracy comparable to HD panels, offering a cost-effective tool for large-scale genomic evaluations.
ER -