Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

The cost of useful natural gradient updates

Abstract

What information is needed to turn a natural-gradient direction into a useful finite update? Under a population Kullback-Leibler (KL) budget, we call a step useful if it is feasible and loses at most a fraction ε of the best feasible gain along the direction. We construct a four-state exponential family whose laws share their initial gradient, scalar Fisher information and natural gradient, yet two laws have disjoint useful-step sets. With these quantities supplied exactly and the law otherwise known only through draws, the family's worst-case sample complexity is Θ(log(1/δ)/(pε2)) for small ε, where p scales rare-state probabilities and δ is the failure probability. The budget is fixed and the optimal gain stays bounded away from zero, so the step length, not the direction, carries this cost. For succinctly described event-tilt models, returning a useful step is NP-hard even with the exact natural gradient and efficient exact sampling. Recovering the unit natural gradient to constant error is also NP-hard even in a two-parameter logistic family with Fisher condition number at most 3. We also give matching sample bounds for event tilts, sample bounds for damped Fisher solves and a population-KL certificate for affine classifiers. In frozen-feature classifier heads, stopping at a sampled KL boundary succeeds in about half of the trials, and a 10% KL margin raises joint success above 93% at a KL budget of 0.01. Thus, knowing where to move is not enough: how far to move can carry an update's entire cost.

Related

  1. Communication-Efficient Differentially Private Gradient Tracking for Distributed Optimization via Local Updates
    Mihitha Maithripala, Chenyang Qiu, Zongli Lin
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. The first ℓ2-Betti number, cost and rank gradient of few-relator random groups
    Miguel Donoso-Echenique, Eduardo Silva
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAlgebra & number theoryDynamical systemsarXiv
  3. Revisiting Natural Gradient Descent for PINNs Using Adaptive Collocation Strategies
    Chourouk El Hassanieh, Agustín Somacal, Mathilde Mougeot
    HALPreprintCC BY-SA 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingHAL
  4. Entire p-harmonic functions with an isolated critical point and failure of C1-regularity of the natural gradient
    Erno Kauranen, Jarkko Siltakoski
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. Gauss-Newton drifting extends natural gradient descent
    Théo Dumont, Théo Lacombe, François-Xavier Vialard
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlHALarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bhattacharjee2026cost,
  title = {{The cost of useful natural gradient updates}},
  author = {Subhransu S. Bhattacharjee and Dylan Campbell and Rahul Shome},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.33499},
  eprint = {2609.33499},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33499},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The cost of useful natural gradient updates
AU  - Subhransu S. Bhattacharjee
AU  - Dylan Campbell
AU  - Rahul Shome
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/27
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.33499
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.33499
AB  - What information is needed to turn a natural-gradient direction into a useful finite update? Under a population Kullback-Leibler (KL) budget, we call a step useful if it is feasible and loses at most a fraction ε of the best feasible gain along the direction. We construct a four-state exponential family whose laws share their initial gradient, scalar Fisher information and natural gradient, yet two laws have disjoint useful-step sets. With these quantities supplied exactly and the law otherwise known only through draws, the family's worst-case sample complexity is Θ(log(1/δ)/(pε^2)) for small ε, where p scales rare-state probabilities and δ is the failure probability. The budget is fixed and the optimal gain stays bounded away from zero, so the step length, not the direction, carries this cost. For succinctly described event-tilt models, returning a useful step is NP-hard even with the exact natural gradient and efficient exact sampling. Recovering the unit natural gradient to constant error is also NP-hard even in a two-parameter logistic family with Fisher condition number at most 3. We also give matching sample bounds for event tilts, sample bounds for damped Fisher solves and a population-KL certificate for affine classifiers. In frozen-feature classifier heads, stopping at a sampled KL boundary succeeds in about half of the trials, and a 10% KL margin raises joint success above 93% at a KL budget of 0.01. Thus, knowing where to move is not enough: how far to move can carry an update's entire cost.
ER  -