Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BYbioRxiv

Reward changes the use and structure of predictive spatial maps

  1. 1Technion - Israel Institute of Technology & Allen Institute for Neural Dynamics

Abstract

Reward-related changes in hippocampal place-cell activity may reflect either different use of an existing spatial map or plasticity that reshapes the map. We separated these contributions in a two-pathway model: a recurrent network learned to predict sensory input and developed a spatial representation, while a reinforcement-learning controller combined this representation with an explicit goal signal to guide behavior. Replaying identical trajectories before and after learning isolated representational plasticity. Goal-directed behavior strongly concentrated place fields near reward, whereas changes to the representation were smaller and more variable. A reward-proximity teaching signal made these changes larger and more consistent, and the change was strongly attenuated when recurrent plasticity was restricted. After reward relocation, goal-related directional tuning adapted more fully than place-field organization, while withdrawing reward and proximity teaching reversed the learned field concentration. Thus, reward affects predictive spatial maps through separable mechanisms: goal information changes how an existing map is used, whereas reward-related teaching signals reshape the map itself. Our results provide a concrete framework for future experiments to disentangle how reward information, plasticity and behavior jointly shape hippocampal activity.

Related

  1. From Reward to Cue: Developmental Changes in Nucleus Accumbens and Dopamine Signaling from Adolescence to Adulthood
    Hannah Nicholson
    eneuroPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
  2. Morphine causes distinct changes in the lipidome throughout the brain and body after acute or chronic administration: implications for novel endogenous lipid signaling systems involved in opioid reward and withdrawal
    T. J. Woodward, E. Chafee, E. Cannon +3
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  3. Paired-surface spatial mechanomics links tissue stiffness maps to spatial transcriptomics
    H. T. Ong, Y. Lou, J. Turley +8
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textSystems & synthetic biologybioRxiv
  4. Kintsugi maps nucleus-poor RNA compartments in subcellular spatial transcriptomics
    C. Yang, X. Zhang, J. Chen
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textBioinformatics & computational biologybioRxiv
  5. A new neural code for position: generalizable spatial maps in mouse medial frontal cortex
    R. Sen, L. Posani, A. Medoff +4
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
BibTeX
@misc{oza2026reward,
  title = {{Reward changes the use and structure of predictive spatial maps}},
  author = {S. Oza and A. Cohen and G. Wager and D. Derdikman and S. Recanatesi},
  howpublished = {bioRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.64898/2026.10.28.762439},
  url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.762439v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Reward changes the use and structure of predictive spatial maps
AU  - S. Oza
AU  - A. Cohen
AU  - G. Wager
AU  - D. Derdikman
AU  - S. Recanatesi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
PB  - bioRxiv
DO  - 10.64898/2026.10.28.762439
UR  - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.28.762439v1
AB  - Reward-related changes in hippocampal place-cell activity may reflect either different use of an existing spatial map or plasticity that reshapes the map. We separated these contributions in a two-pathway model: a recurrent network learned to predict sensory input and developed a spatial representation, while a reinforcement-learning controller combined this representation with an explicit goal signal to guide behavior. Replaying identical trajectories before and after learning isolated representational plasticity. Goal-directed behavior strongly concentrated place fields near reward, whereas changes to the representation were smaller and more variable. A reward-proximity teaching signal made these changes larger and more consistent, and the change was strongly attenuated when recurrent plasticity was restricted. After reward relocation, goal-related directional tuning adapted more fully than place-field organization, while withdrawing reward and proximity teaching reversed the learned field concentration. Thus, reward affects predictive spatial maps through separable mechanisms: goal information changes how an existing map is used, whereas reward-related teaching signals reshape the map itself. Our results provide a concrete framework for future experiments to disentangle how reward information, plasticity and behavior jointly shape hippocampal activity.
ER  -