Heterogeneous relationships between the multisensory content of aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences
- 1Perception Lab, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland
- 2Department of Psychology, University of Bonn
Abstract
Aphantasia was initially characterised as a pictorial imaginative deficit, but many people with Aphantasia also report having imaginative inabilities for other sensory modalities, such as for imagined sensations of audition, taste, smell, touch, and of body movements. Moreover, patterns of imaginative inability across different types of imagined experience are individually specific to different Aphantasics. Many Aphantasics also report having visual dreams, which has prompted the suggestion that Aphantasia might be an imaginative inability specific to volitional waking imagined sensations. Until now, no study had investigated the multisensory profiles of Aphantasics’ dreams, to assess how these might relate to their volitional waking imagined experiences. Here, we make that assessment and find that there is typically a correspondence between the reported multisensory contents of Aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences. However, there is considerable heterogeneity, with tight associations between the reported multisensory content of some Aphantasic’s dreams and their volitional waking imagined sensations, and little or no correspondence between the multisensory profiles of imagined sensations across different states of consciousness in other Aphantasics. Our data challenge researchers and theorists of Aphantasia to explain why different Aphantasics report having different contingencies between their volitional waking and dreamt imagined sensations – with one possibility being that neurological differences exist that account for these diverse outcomes.
Related
- Associations between adverse childhood experiences, parent-child and peer attachment relationships, and daily-life self-harm in adolescents
- Multisensory stimulation for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants
- From defeat to entrapment—and back again: Reciprocal dynamics among constructs from the Integrated Motivational-Volitional model of suicide in young adults
- From Structural Blindness to Structural Perception: Theorizing LUMEN, a Multisensory Pedagogy for the Structural Determinants of Health in Nursing Education.
- The human hippocampus supports auditory coding and multisensory integration
BibTeX
@article{arnold2026heterogeneous,
title = {{Heterogeneous relationships between the multisensory content of aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences}},
author = {Derek H. Arnold and Loren N. Bouyer and Merlin Monzel},
journal = {Scientific Reports},
year = {2026},
month = jun,
doi = {10.1038/s41598-026-56386-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-56386-9},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Heterogeneous relationships between the multisensory content of aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences
AU - Derek H. Arnold
AU - Loren N. Bouyer
AU - Merlin Monzel
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/06/01
JO - Scientific Reports
DO - 10.1038/s41598-026-56386-9
UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-56386-9
AB - Aphantasia was initially characterised as a pictorial imaginative deficit, but many people with Aphantasia also report having imaginative inabilities for other sensory modalities, such as for imagined sensations of audition, taste, smell, touch, and of body movements. Moreover, patterns of imaginative inability across different types of imagined experience are individually specific to different Aphantasics. Many Aphantasics also report having visual dreams, which has prompted the suggestion that Aphantasia might be an imaginative inability specific to volitional waking imagined sensations. Until now, no study had investigated the multisensory profiles of Aphantasics’ dreams, to assess how these might relate to their volitional waking imagined experiences. Here, we make that assessment and find that there is typically a correspondence between the reported multisensory contents of Aphantasics’ dreams and their volitional waking imagined experiences. However, there is considerable heterogeneity, with tight associations between the reported multisensory content of some Aphantasic’s dreams and their volitional waking imagined sensations, and little or no correspondence between the multisensory profiles of imagined sensations across different states of consciousness in other Aphantasics. Our data challenge researchers and theorists of Aphantasia to explain why different Aphantasics report having different contingencies between their volitional waking and dreamt imagined sensations – with one possibility being that neurological differences exist that account for these diverse outcomes.
SN - 2045-2322
ER -